Incorporating Congestion Control in BGP Considering Its Economic & Policy Effects

the routing protocol is simply flooding, S will broadest the data packets and then these data packets are rebroadcasted by every neighbor of S, and

| Given a network topology of three or more routers with bandwidth designations, compare the metrics used during the route selection process and the resulting routing tables generated by the DUAL and SPF algorithms.

Monitored the network congestion in order to achieve the optimal performance out of a network infrastructure.

In this example, here node A wants to send data packets to node D and starts to find the shortest path for its destination, so if node D is a malicious node then it will show that it has active route to the specified destination. It will then send the response In the example, data packets transfer in a hierarchic data center network. The link capacity is 1000 kb/s. The number on each is the traffic load. The distribution of traffic is based on equal cost multi-path (ECMP). In figure 8, we can see that the 3). Congestions

This protocol use Dijkstra algorithm. It maintains a complex data base, also called as link state database, which contains full information about the remote routers and the exact network topology. The goal from this protocol is to provide similar information about network connection to each router, so each router can calculate the best route to each network this is happen when each router generates information about itself and pass these information to other routers in the network so each router make a copy of this information without changing it.

The sender establishes a priority order in accordance to the importance of the packets. This way the sender instructs to the routers in the intermediate nodes about the packets classified as of low priority that can be temporarily discarded. This way the load on the network does not become so heavy and the available bandwidth is better exploited.

In simulated network the source node designated as1 initiates the routing procedure by sending RREQ or Route Request message to its surrounding nodes. The RREQ message sent by the source node is denoted in the color green. The other RREQ messages are shown in cyan, yellow, black etc. The source node 1 is sending the RREQ message to its neighbour nodes 5, 6, 9, 11 and 13 and the links are formed shown by the green line. Every time node 5,6,9,11,13 is sending the RREQ message to its neighbour and the links are formed.

b)if we are using Circuit Switched method for Above given Application there will be no need of congestion control.where there exist so many links available in network and each link will give good bandwidth.so we dont need any type of Congestion control.

contains the case narrative, related figures, and a set of questions and problems. These do not have one unique solution. There are too many alternatives when dealing with LANs, WANs, MANs, BNs, and the Internet, so a reallife network design and development problem can have several workable answers.

The biggest concern is that the internet will become pay-to-play technology with two tiers: one that has speedy service and one that doesn’t. The high-speed lane would be occupied by big internet and media companies, and affluent households. For everyone else there would be the slow lane.

While Internet Service Providers (ISPs) want to create a tiered approach, saving the faster speeds for their premium customers while charging “heavy band-with users” in order to generate revenue, enhance their systems and build more robust, more advanced networks,

The proposed methods have been tasted on large network. (Mat Lab) Programming languages has been used to create the topology of the network (Fig 3). The number of lanes per link is four for all links. Predata files (paths, routing protocols, light tables and color map) are configured.

The idea being that a company could slow a site that they have competition with so that it would incentivize the consumer to use their alternative for the website. So if Comcast wanted to get people to stream shows off of their service, they could slow down the connection to services like Netflix. The worst case scenario from this field is an internet where the government does nothing to prevent “fast lanes” emerging where users who pay extra are given preferential treatment and have their internet speeds ramped up. This would leave the normal everyday user forced to pay extreme amounts in order to get the basic internet speeds currently available. Another concern is that it may become like cable television in which one has to buy access to websites in bundles like channels to get normal speeds or at load them at all. There is evidence of companies wanting compensation to load certain websites, for example: Netflix saw a 27% decline in access speed for its users and have been refused service from companies like Comcast and AT&T unless they paid for the access, a direct violation of their position as common carriers

By "covertly blocking or degrading internet traffic" to sites affiliated with rival content suppliers, the ISP is seen to be in position to favour those of its partners. There will be a fast lane on the iternet for those apps your "last mile" provider prefers - and a traffic jam for everyone else. The innovation in the garage does not enjoy the size, scope, or cash in the bank to buy its way inn discouraging grassroots innovation. "the harms that could result from threats to openness are significant and likely irreversible", warns the

By putting internet alongside the same services are telecommunications, the laws regarding net neutrality would be clear and concrete for ISPs, especially the rules on blocking and throttling connections, which is overall beneficial for maintaining net neutrality in the United States. The vague statements in the Open Internet Order would become clearer and ISPs would be held accountable for breaking its principles. These regulations would further improve the user experience, as section 224 of the Communications Act would make internet service a universal service. This meant that ISPs would have to provide affordable internet services, as well as preventing ISPs from tracking the online behaviours of their users, as explained