Indians Treated Differently According To The Colony Essay

Another reason the relationship between the Natives and the British were not as good, was those coming over for religious freedom. For instance, the Puritans did not have a strong relationship between the Natives. Puritanism was a type of Christianity and they believed there was only one God. On the other hand, the Native Americans believed differently. They believed that everyone was equal. The Puritans put their faith above everything while the Natives had actions, like dancing and rituals. Also, the Puritans believed in selling land while Natives did not. As one can assume that would not settle for a healthy relationship. The Puritans treated the Natives with disrespect due to the fact they had different beliefs. As Document 1 states, years later, the Indian religion would convert to Christianity. The Quakers also came over to the “New World” for religious freedom. The way the British treated the Natives is similar to the way the Nazis treated the Jews. The Jews and the natives were both looked down upon for a certain amount of time. The two groups’ social rank was at the bottom, based on their stance on their religion. Both groups were also murdered for their beliefs. The relationship between Natives and Quakers was different than the relationship of the Puritans and Natives. Very soon, the Quakers began to realize that their actions toward the

While killing one another, is already not socially proper the Settlers also cramped the American Indians on their land. They decided to place their forts in center of Powhatan settlement asking to attacked bu the natives. The map on page five depicts the placement. As well as placing the forts in Powhatan land they also have some by sea, in wait of the Spanish ships. While being preoccupied, of the Spanish invaders out in sea they have forgotten of threats five miles away. The colonists are unprepared to make peace with the Native Americans, my evidence illustrates how they hurt and mistook the power the alliance would have which would benefit them greatly since they did not have

When the English settlers began their colonization of America, they were unsure on how to approach the indigenous people. They were not prepared for a war initially, nor did they have all of the supplies required to survive. In chapter one of, Lethal Encounters Englishmen and Indians in Colonial Virginia, Albert Cave describes Sir Walter Raleigh’s decisions about the Roanoke colonial and Indian policies. Raleigh instructed the settlers to treat the Natives with ‘kindness and generosity’ (Cave, Lethal Encounters Englishmen and Indians in Colonial Virginia, pg 11). The English settlers recognized the

American colonists and the Native Americans of North America have had challenges getting along with each other ever since they encountered early in the 17th century. During the American Revolutionary war they were allies but once the white settlers gained freedom, they started to seek more land, which happened to be the land Native Americans occupied. After a long ferocious thirty year war, President Andrew Jackson issued The first annual address to congress, this article fulfills Monroe’s Motivated Sequence, contains bias and assertion which marginalize and silence the voice of Native Americans.

He discusses one instance where the English joined in an alliance with the Iroquois in order to further an “anti-French sentiment,” which would then aid the English in maintaining control of the land and trade. I do not believe that the advantages that the Iroquois gained from these “cultivated ties,” if any, were clearly presented in the book. Furthermore, not only does it seem like the Indians were not in control of their own destiny and actions at times, but also that they were naive to look positively on the “diplomatic gifts” from the Europeans. For example, in 1673, the Dutch military “gave the Mohawks a diplomatic present” in hopes that the Mohawks would tell the commander of the state “to put a stop to all correspondence with the Jesuit and Frenchmen from Canada” (135). In the midst of the different European nations’ struggles with one another, it is difficult to see where the Iroquois really come into play and make a case for their own identity until the 18th

Also, according to document E, 144 colonists died by the hands of the Native Americans in the years of 1607 to 1610. This again shows the tension between the two groups. Although it is the Native Americans that do the attacking, it may be because of the settler’s treatment in document D, which is the trading incident or the threat the colonists pose. It may seem threatening if many strange people you have never seen before appear on your property, making a home with just all men. These men had guns and built walls around their homes and obviously did not trust anybody.

In order to protect their lands the Indians needed to have a good relationship both with the British and the French. Both relations were very different, they preferred the relation with the French side.

The New England colonies also had a bad relationship with the natives because in some parts of the colony like Massachusetts persecuted the natives because they wanted them to switch to their religion, they also needed more native land for their timber industry and also fur trade. The people of

In the early 1800’s, The United States and Spain had continuously argued with the Native people. The Louisiana Territory was purchased from France in the year 1803, Americans continued to push farther west for fertile land that could be used for farming. Due to overcrowding of eastern cities like New York City and Boston many settlers moved out west for a new start. It allowed for colonists to spread out and own untouched fertile land. When white settlers arrived they had realized that most of the land acquired from the territory was occupied by Native Americans for thousands of years. For decades Americans had thought that the land west of the Appalachian Mountains were unoccupied, but they were wrong. There were many tribes that had occupied this land. This included tribes like, The Choctaw, Cherokee, and The Chickasaw. In a sense, Americans had violent outbreaks with the Natives the minute the colonists’ had arrived in the United State. As the colonists’ tried to establish complete dominance and superiority over the Indians, ongoing heated debates over land ownership, and demanding requests to satisfy greed made forceful attacks between the groups unavoidable.

The textbook simply allows you to see the past from the settlers’ eyes and never really goes into detail about how the natives were peaceful and obedient. If you were to rely only on the textbook to learn about the natives’ you would believe they were violent people. The primary sources give you the chance to learn what Columbus, Cabeza de Vaca, and de las Casas all thought about the Indians during their first encounters with them. Overall, these primary sources provide a description of how humble and patient the natives were with these new settlers, which gives you the opportunity to see both sides of the past, whereas the textbook basically excludes all of this information and deprives you from being able to understand things from the Indians’ point of view. In Christopher Columbus’ letter to Luis Santángel he states, “Of anything they have, if it be asked for, they never say no, but do rather invite the person to accept it, and show as much lovingness as though they would give their hearts”, which shows how the Native Americans were welcoming to Columbus and his crew.

The relationship between the English and the Native Americans in 1600 to 1700 is one of the most fluctuating and the most profound relationships in American history. On the one side of the picture, the harmony between Wampanoag and Puritans even inspires them to celebrate “first Thanksgiving”; while, by contrast, the conflicts between the Pequots and the English urge them to antagonize each other, and even wage a war. In addition, the mystery of why the European settlers, including English, become the dominant power in American world, instead of the indigenous people, or Indians, can be solved from the examination of the relationship. In a variety of ways, the relationship drastically alters how people think about and relate to the aborigines. Politically, the relationship changes to establish the supremacy of the English; the English intends to obtain the land and rules over it. Socially, the relationship changes to present the majority of the English settlers; the dominating population is mostly the English settlers. Economically, the relationship changes to obtain the benefit of the English settlers; they gain profit from the massive resource in America. Therefore, the relationship does, in fact, change to foreshadow the discordance of the two groups of people.

During American colonial times, the native peoples of the new world clashed often with the English settlers who encroached upon their lifestyle. Many horror stories and clichés arose about the natives from the settlers. As one might read in Mary Rowlandson’s Narrative, often these disputes would turn to violence. To maintain the process of the extermination of the natives alongside Christian moral beliefs, one of the main tenets of colonial life was the belief that the natives were “savages”; that they were morally and mentally inferior to the English that settled there. As is the case with many societies, certain voices of dissent began to spin. These voices questioned the assertions

Native Americans were somehow powerful and had everything that English colonists wanted. They were seeking wealth and they had the answers in Jamestown. When tobacco start growing, the English colony became powerful and expanded their colony over Jamestown peninsula. Powhatan Indians were disappointed when English did not maintain a trading way with them. In 1622 Native Americans took a step forward by attacking the colony. They killed 347 colonists. As it is stated on the second chapter of the book, The American Yawp, “The colonist retaliated and revisited the massacres upon Indian settlements many times over. The Massacre freed the colonist to drive the Indians off their land.” Once the English colony gained power, they forgot about the people who kept them alive, they forgot about Native Americans. English colonists were so ungrateful and blind because they had one goal in mind, and that was to be wealthy. They didn't care how they would gain wealth. The only thing that mattered to them was gaining

In 1620, the first batch of European settlers come to New England area. They are hoping to live peacefully with Indians since the settlers demand to receive food and supplies from the Indians. Meanwhile, the new immigrants clearly understand that they are weak and inferior. Once if they have conflicts with Indians, they have no chance to win the battle. Another major reason that French and Britain need to ally with Native Americans in the early 17th century is because the idea of mercantilism. Since they believe that the wealth of nation should mainly from trading, both nations want to have more profit from fur trading. European settlers and Indians also exchange crops, tools, and know-how. Likewise, Indians want the new immigrants to be their allies to defeat enemies in the future days. However, the problems egress inevitably. Because of the largely different beliefs on lands owning and religion, even more migration of population, and external diseases, European settlers and Indians break their peace and enter wars soon after.

To show the Indians their gratitude the British decided to show them their gratitude in the form of a royal proclamation. By making the Appalachians off limits too white settlers the natives received hunting ground. For the Indians this deal was great, after years of being persecuted and subjugated they finally get something in return. Now for the land hungry settlers this was devastating, they saw it as a travesty seeing as how this was passed right after the French war. This is because once the French were gone lands to the south west of the colonies were open for business, but then parliament stepped in.