Indigent Compliances

On Tuesday March 8th, 2016 Case Conference with Resident Ebony Rice #325 has been conducted with Janette Chirico from DHS , Program Director Felicita Rivera, Housing Program Supervisor Zenobia Garland and Senior Case Manager Ms. Arias. The purpose of this meeting was to address client noncompliance and to come with an exit strategy for this Ms. Rice. Client was asked the reason for her missing ILP meetings and her barrier to obtain permanent housing. Client has a LINCH voucher for the amount of $1515. Client stated that she hasn’t receives any help from facility staff so she is searching for apartment on her own. Ms. Rice has been receiving assistance by the onsite housing department but unfortunately she has been able to link to an apartment

The Petitioners, officials of the State of North Carolina, are askeding for the decision of that case to be overruled. They argued that “if inmate communications on legal problems are not restricted, there is no further obligation to expend state funds to implement affirmatively the right of access.” The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

This appeal involves a dispute regarding the interpretation of overtime pay provisions outlined in the Howard County General Pay Plan (“HCGPP”). Appellant, Lynda Neser (“Neser”) contends that she was deprived of compensation to which she was entitled under certain provisions of the HCGPP. Neser filed a grievance with the Howard County Personnel Office. A personnel officer denied Neser’s grievance. Neser then appealed the personnel officer’s decision to the appellees, the Howard County Personnel Board (“the Board”). The Board adopted the findings of the personnel officer and affirmed the denial of Neser’s grievance. Neser then filed a petition for judicial review in the Circuit Court for Howard County. The circuit court affirmed the

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Warden's response is affirmed. You failed to provide the necessary documentation to prove Inmate Wells 187589, should have been added to your Do Not House With list prior to your arrival at the Buckley Unit on 11/21/2016. It is your responsibility to ensure that all appropriate documentation is submitted, so your Do Not House With list remains current.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. The Arizona Department of Corrections has entered into a contract with Century Link to provide telephone service for inmates and their families. The Century Link Company is complying with the terms of their contractual obligation with ADC. ADC inmates are not authorized to have internet access. Therefore, your proposed resolution is denied.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Bureau Administrator's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 903 INMATE WORK ACTIVITES

Whether an Individual would be found guilty “operation” under Indiana OWI Statute, when the car’s engine was not turned, the gear status was in neutral, and the car’s auxiliary functions being used were only the headlights and the car stereo. Additionally, when the car was found 12 miles away from its original parked location, and when the individual left the original location in an upset and emotional manner, and lastly was found asleep in the backseat of the vehicle.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Warden's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 903 INMATE WORK ACTIVITIES

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. Pursuant to Director’s Instruction 326 Maximum Custody Population Management

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 902 INMATE LEGAL ACCESS TO THE COURTS

Based upon our review, you filed a grievance because you are upset that Mifflin Care Center is billing for room and board and you did not feel the amount is correct. You also stated your authorization was denied for not medically necessary.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Bureau Administrator's response is affirmed. You were removed from your position in ACI due to a scan of your outgoing mail revealing your negative opinion towards the ACI supervisor.

I am writing to inform you that I will not appeal your recent decision on my work from October 2013 to April 2015 because I have been told by a clerk in the Atlanta Social Security office that an appeal would make my disability case longer to correct and that you already made a decision in my case. According to him I have no recourse left.

I am writing out of need for your assistance with a grievance against the unit 1-30th FA Bravo Btry regarding myself 2LT Cedric Street. Upon graduation of the Field Artillery BOLC I was to assume the role of a Fire Support Officer at Fort Bragg 82nd Airborne, however this has come with undue burden and hardship.

I have reviewed your appeal dated July 14, 2016. You claim Correction Officer I (COI) Patrick Murdock turned you away from treatment on May 9, 2016. COI Murdock stated he did inform the nurse on duty of your concerns and was instructed to relay her response. COI Murdock stated you were informed the nurse was conducting examinations and would not be available to attend to your concerns for at least an hour. You were provided a choice of filling out a Health Services Request (HSR) form or wait until the nurse was available to conduct an examination. You choose to fill out the HSR form and return to the housing unit. On May 11, 2016, you were examined and treated by Certified Family Nurse Practitioner Dana Jost. There is no evidence to support