Influencing Violence, Inspiring Fear
World renowned speaker and author John C. Maxwell has sold over eighteen million books that highlight the most important aspect of leadership. He is responsible for the training of over five million leaders in over one-hundred countries and developed several key leadership theories, including “the seven factors that influence” (Maxwell, 2013). What Maxwell’s factors do not include is the intent or application of this influence, be it for good or evil. The application of each seven factors is significant in the leadership traits of Osama bin Laden, the face and former leader of the Sunni Islamist militant terror group Al-Qaeda. Bin Laden’s use of character, relationships, knowledge, intuition, experience, past success and ability, not only inspired the terror group Al-Qaeda, but drastically increased the world’s fear of terrorism.
Character – “True leadership always begins with the inner person” (John Maxwell)
For the majority of the free world, the character of Osama Bin Laden is relative to the attacks of September 11th, 2001. In the years to follow, the evidence collected as a result of a worldwide, multinational manhunt, revealed the complexity of the Al-Qaeda leader. In her published memoirs, former wife of bin Laden, Najwa bin Laden claims her husband had conflicting personalities (Farmer, 2009). Najwa cited her husband as a disciplinarian who would often beat their (his) children for displaying to much joy, laughing too much
The three degrees of violence I chose are physical violence, verbal violence, and prejudice. All of the types of violence I chose can be very hurtful, whether it hurts someone physically or emotionally. Violence is present everywhere. We see it on the news, we see it in person, we hear about it, and it’s overall all around us. Violence has always happened no matter when or where you are.
Violence in America America is a violent nation. Many people think that America is full of freedom and democracy. Do these people actually see what happens in America? Do they see the violence in schools, the crime in our society? Most likely, no, these people have loosely seen our society, the violence and the frauds that plague America's history as well as the present.
Violence is a social problem that increases over the years. Violence is not so much shown in magazines and books as it is on television and the media. This does not mean that violence on television is the only source for aggressive or violent behavior, but it is a significant contributor. Children can also pick up violence from a parent or guardian at an early age. Peers are important in a child's life. It has been psychologically proven that males are more aggressive than females. Therefore, if a child's peers are being aggressive, their actions tend to be imitated.
Popular Culture and Violent Behavior Introduction In 1871 E.B. Taylor defined culture as 'that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, customs, and many other capabilities and habits acquired by... [members] of society. '[1] Taylor was talking about 'high' culture, an aristocratic view of the past-times such as ballet, theatre and art.
Bin Laden formed biases against America based on teachings from extremist mentors he had attached himself to in his younger years (Dreisbach, 2011). Bin Laden’s ethical trap of ethical relativism coupled with his personal biases and prejudices against the US led him to be unethical. Next, I will discuss my own personal relevance with relation to the traits that made bin Laden a visionary leader and caused him to be unethical. Researching Osama bin Laden’s traits as both a visionary leader and unethical leader allowed me to reflect on my own traits as a leader, which I will now discuss, beginning with my Full Range Leadership traits.
Violence is inherently flawed. In the immortal words of Gandhi, "Victory attained by violence is tantamount to a defeat, for it is momentary." Therefore the most successful strategy for long-lasting peace and independence is nonviolence. This concept is crucial to understand the history of this time period. Violence and the lack of it, nonviolence plays a major role in the play of this chapter. Many question the practicality of nonviolence: “How can it work?” “Why can't armed and powerful opponents simply kill everyone that doesn't agree with them?” The answer couldn't be simpler: because the people will revolt. A few thousand oppressors wielding violence simply cannot control several million determined people. This lack of control is
Since the beginning of the United States of America, citizens have been concerned with having their voices heard in government. To protect the rights of the people the United States Constitution was amended to guarantee that “Congress shall make no law . . . prohibiting . . . the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”(U.S. Const. amend. I). But, in recent years, the American people have abused their right to protest, relying on violence to obtain attention, and in doing so discrediting their own causes. The people of America must restrain themselves from using violence to make changes to society.
Melbourne metropolitan ambulance and hospitals records show cases of assault and violence have almost doubled since 1999 to over 600 a month. These assaults cases including stabbings and gunshots raise from about 50 to 100 a month. According to Victorian Police data from June 2006 to June 2007, there had been more than 2000 cases of assaults reported. The police record showed that assaults in the public places in Victoria had increased by 20% in the past five years and reached to almost 14,000 a year. Most of the cases are night-time assaults and much, but not all, was alcohol and drug-related and most of young people aged 14-35 were involved as offenders and victims. The rise become the long-term trend of increasing rates of violent crime in Victoria which was the alarming
You see human beings doing stuff for no reason or just because they feel like it. Most never have a reason they just do it out of spite. People minding their business still get caught in the crossfire, “A justified fear of Trump does not justify violence against an individual just trying to leave a rally.”(Newkirk), you could be minding your own business and still get caught in the middle of violence. Protesters see people fighting in protest because it gets heated and people just gets irritated with each other, most are so stubborn that they only believe what they believe. When violence occurs more violence follows. While some others think that violence is justified there are multiple reasons why it’s not.
Over the years, the public have gone through very little peace and a mass amount of violence every day of their lives. Whether it is because of the actions of a leader or the actions due to enforced laws, people have gone and will go events in their lives that are too emotional to forget. And to read about the same violence they have gone through in the past has made us realize whether or not we are doomed to repeat our mistakes and cause the same violent acts that have been caused before. In this essay, I will provide examples of violence shown in the works of different authors and how their characters and stories have provided ways in which they have handled their actions to prevent further violence from contaminating their lives.
Suddenly, the rumors started. They lurked behind closed doors, spread like wildfire through private channels, creating a silent tension throughout the school. According to speculation, threats were circulating through the student body- not towards those in black, but towards those in red, white, and blue. Students whispered that those in patriotic clothing would be in danger from those in black, and uneasiness circulated through staff and student body alike. I was shocked and disheartened by the deterioration of a peaceful protest into the use of fear to spur along an agenda. Although few took notice of the threats initially, they evoked concern and fear as the week progressed. The homecoming pep rally was canceled for fear of violence. A copious amount of students resolved to stay home with the same rationale. Additional cops were hired, administrators roamed the halls. Well-meaning friends warned me to dress normally in the interest of my own safety, and the majority adhered their own advice in their decision to not participate. Foolishly, I almost followed suit. A conversation with my mother, however, caused me to thoroughly reexamine the situation.
In society today there are many ideas and even studies on what leadership is, who are powerful leaders, and how does an individual become a so called leader. Some experts in the field say “Leadership is social influence. By their ideas and deeds, leaders show the way and influence the behavior of others” (2015, p.2). One item that is certain across all leadership studies is that for one to be called a leader, he or she will need followers. Followers support their leaders with two items “respect for authority and interpersonal trust” (2015, p.40). The article “Terrorism vs Individualism” by Ralph R. Reiland, is a testament to what is possible when the combination of effective leadership and willing followers unit. An effective leader can influence
Violence is resulted by many causes that can make a person believe that it can be an alternative for most if not all cases. In the article, “Why Are Humans Violent? The Psychological Reason We Hurt Each Other” by Kirk Schneider, it discusses the possibility of the approach to stop violence by getting insecure people to get mental health and later others can have a similar perspective of supporting non-violence. With this intention, can it be viable to persuade a portion of those affected by violence to persuade others to act nonviolent or avoid it?
Terrorist leaders, similar to both military officers and business CEOs companies execute various responsibilities for their respective organizations. Which they perform two primary functions: motivation for their organization, and management duties for their organization, providing operational direction. Though, differing from business CEOs Terrorist leaders use their charismatic charisma and their “unique gifts both spirituality and psychologically,” to inspire the associates of the terrorist cell to sacrifice the leader and his vision, in preference to the individuals benefit. A terrorist leader must be proven in life that varies across cultures and time. For example, “if he wants to be a warlord, he must have performed heroic deeds in combat.” Similar to OBL and Hitler, Leaders of terrorist cells display an unusual ability to experience passion, persistence, determination, optimism and extraordinary self-confidence, by a continuous contagious faith and confidence in the community's ability to overcome, duress under their leadership. Thus, to gain respect they most importantly must possess the ability to invoke “enthusiasm and awe” from his/her followers. Incorporating a sense of entitlement and/or pride to the group followers, will allow focus upon the ideology and dream of a leader.
The purpose of this paper is to present, and critically analyze different psychological approaches regarding terrorism. As all professional literature depicting human behavior and social matters, psychological theories have advantages and limitations. Through the study of six scientific and professional literatures, I will evaluate to what extent psychopathology, individual’s personality and individual’s life experience are relevant to understand terrorism.