Info Wars Essay

In the article “Selecting the Perfect Baby: The Ethics of “Embryo Design,” is an article about a married couple, name Larry and June Shannon. They have a daughter, four years old, name Sally, who is diagnosed with Fanconi Anemia. Therefore, the Shannons are getting help from a research team, to find the perfect bone marrow transplant for Sally. The Shannon couple is also interested in having another child and they are aware of the risks and odds of success. However, a PGD process has to be performed and the couple must undergo an IVF procedure more than once, before the implantation is successful, to be able to produce a healthy full-term baby.

Throughout history, there have been a multitude of examples of wars brought too close to home. At times, there comes a point in war where consideration of innocent lives becomes thin, and all energy is put towards war efforts, rather than any other aspect of human life. These points in history are referred to as total war. Examples of total war can be seen as far back as in the ancient civilizations of Rome and Persia, however, the paragon of total war can be found in World War Two. Based on the overall involvement of a vast multitude of civilians, economies and countries targeted and impacted throughout the war, World War Two is the strongest example of total war in American history.

Unfortunately, this leads to some dogmatism in her article. In responding to Congress’s idea of stripping away Planned Parenthood’s funding, she writes “It is also not rational – whatever your position in the abortion debate.” She is overconfident that defunding Planned Parenthood is irrational. It doesn’t matter if one is pro-choice or pro-life; she implies that both sides should see it as irrational. By making this assumption with her dogmatic language, she damages her credibility because she generalizes what other people may believe when she does not have the authority to do so. She commits the fallacy of dogmatism again when she explains that fetal tissue for research “is supported – as it should be - by federal funds.” By adding that small excerpt in the middle of the sentence, she inserts herself into the conversation and reveals how confident she is that research should be supported. Her overconfidence can cause doubt in the reader because it seems as if she is too closed-minded to accept other point of

There is definite bias in this article. The author definitely states his side by clearly stating how the partial births take place and his views on it.

The article has multiple authors and while the actual newspaper isn’t well known in the country, the information used is accurate when describing the last mass shootings in the United States.

It was a lovely spring day on April 6th, 1977 when a little girl was delivered. This delivery was not your normal delivery; it involved hours of preparation, but not your typical preparation. For the last seven and a half months a mother had been carrying this child in her womb. Running out of options she visited a clinic called Planned Parenthood hoping for advice. They advised her to have a late term saline abortion. This abortion method causes the next 24 hours to be an ongoing battle as the child will burn from the inside out before the mother delivers the lifeless fetus. Not until after the delivery does the abortionist confirm the successful abortion. In this instance however, this little girl received a miracle.

All in all, The New York Times editors purpose of this article is to persuade the readers to help make abortion legal. They use emotional connection with the audience, a sophisticated word choice, and logic. Ultimately, the writers have proven that abortion is a woman’s own choice, not the

Abortion is a major social issue where many people obtain different perspectives and opinions other than being one sided. People who are for or against abortion both possess logical explanations as to why they choose which side of the issue they stand on along with their own exceptions. The two different articles share the same issues about abortion. One article is called “’Prolife Progression’ is Not an Oxymoron.” Written by Gerald Schlabach and published by the Commonweal magazine. The second article is, “According to Pro-Aborts, Even Pictures of Babies in the Womb are ‘Graphic Images,’” written by Jonathon Van Maren and published by National Rights to Life News magazine. Both articles provide great insight and evidence; however, Gerald Schlabach’s article gives a more clear and concise persuasive aspect of the issue, better word choice, organization, and more in-depth support.

MediLexicon, Intl.; 8 Apr. 2016. Web. 10 Dec. 2016 http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles182951.php Our Bodies Ourselves Abortion Contributors. ?

The fourth source is another non academic source that is not credited. It is a website by the name of “Pregnancy” and the article is titled “Abortion Should be Legal” written by Deanna Mascle. It seems that this article is based on her personal stance more so than logic and credibility. Therefore the essay identifies as a dominantly pathos style writing. Since this women is not well known or accredited to being knowledgeable in the subject, it lowers the amount of trustworthiness put in her because the writing is mainly based on her understanding of the

Michael Kelly, a name that is attached to credible publishers such as: The Washington Post and the National Journal, was a columnist and editor known for his spill on controversial topics. As a dig to his career, “Dialogues” fails to properly spell his name correctly, adding an extra ‘e’. Nevertheless, when he saw an article released by a notable name in 1997, he couldn’t let his legacy die. Line after line, he ripped apart the very foundation that Steven Pinker tried to build in his essay, “Why They Kill Their Newborns,” which is an article favoring infanticide, or the act of killing a newborn. Kelly considers many of Pinker’s claims, ultimately providing evidence to why it might be wrong, by his standards. In his response piece, he deems

With new technologies available everyday, it seems almost as if we can customize our children. Reproduction is no longer an outcome of random and inherited genes, but now it’s a process of creating the child that we want to have. Fertility clinics are in debate as to whether or not it is ethical to be able to determine the sex of our children. Some view this as a valid option, while others see it as another step down the road to designer babies. But how far is too far? That is a question that we can only answer for ourselves. While this article remains unbiased, we are able to form our own opinion after seeing the pros and cons of both sides.

It is generally accepted that information is a vital commodity for the successful operation of today’s organizations. Nowadays modern business organizations are using computerized information systems in order to obtain such information. However as the technology advances rapidly the main issue is how can an organization should effectively use such an information system - which its management sometimes can be unpredictable - in order to effectively help the whole organization structure to improve and take the most out of it.

Going straight to the source is the best way to check if the information in the article is reliable and credible.

The tone that is dominant throughout the article supports the claim that the author has allowed his emotions to dominant his diction, therefore displaying his biasness. “…‘big up’ mothers. Mothers probably wanted to, but decided not to abort or kill that child in the womb!” While the writer praises mothers in this instant, he implies the contrary to the women who aborted. Chisholm chooses not to consider the possible reasons that may lead to abortion and argues his points accordingly, despite the glaring counterarguments. Hence being biased against women who considers abortion as a solution. The author further goes on to discriminate doctors by referring to them as ‘a certain brand of medical schizophrenia.’ Again, without careful examination of the controversy on a whole, he displays a bias attitude towards the medical community. The author’s choice of words clearly reveal that he holds doctors partially responsible for their contribution the abortion. Here, he creates a fallacy, since he distracts the audience with distorted arguments, rather than tackling the issue from logical and realistic perspective. Without any authentic investigation, Chisholm displays biasness against them, in that, he does not consider their point of view or stance in the matter, therefore presenting examples that are debatable. This piece conveys the author’s points in an emotively biased