Institutional Review Boards: A Key Objectives Of Irbs

Studies like the one in the Film “The Deadly Deception” where unethical studies with someone being experimented on and the tester didn’t fully explain the risks and the real dangers involved but the

IRB is an abbreviation for the institutional review board. Informed by the need to review human biomedical and behavioral research to the mutual benefit of the researcher and the sample population oversight, responsibilities have to be designated to an impartial body. In light of this, the IRB is also commonly referred to as the independent ethics committee or the ethical review board. Indeed, biomedical and behavioral research on humans is not a light discipline as some of the research tenets border on life and death. It is thus important to evaluate whether the

| The study involves no more than minimal risk and meets one of the allowable categories of expedited review specified in federal regulations. Expedited review procedures are appropriate only for protocols that present no greater than "minimal risk" to subjects and involve only procedures included in federally specified categories. Population considerations, such as healthy volunteers, are only relevant insofar as they affect the assessment of risk. The IRB may not conduct an expedited review for the convenience of either the IRB or a student researcher, if the protocol is otherwise not eligible.

In the famous Belmont Report, several guidelines regarding informed consent, assessment of risk and benefits, and selection of subjects in addition to ethical practice and procedure in the area of human research are outlined. The Belmont Report attempts to summarize the basic ethical principles identified by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (Belmont Report, 1979). In particular I would like to discuss the standards for informed consent, assessment of risk and benefits, and selection of test subjects drawn out by the Belmont Report. These three areas of interest are said to be the applications of the general

All applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during this research. All participants were informed orally and in writing about the study, including the purpose of the study, the methods used (i.e., interviews, observations with field

Based from this experiments, The Belmont Report Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research was submitted in April 18,1979 to …….? (“Impact,” n.d.).

The major aim of the commission, which made the Belmont report was to ensure that ethical principles are followed during a research involving human beings as the subjects. The commission was tasked with considering the instinct between the biomedical and behavioral research and the normal routine that have been acceptable in medicine. It was also tasked with assessing the various risks that arise in determining the use of human during research exercise. The commission also was to establish the various necessary consents during the research settings.

Overall, the IRB exists to prevent unethical research from being conducted on humans. The goal is to prevent the past from repeating itself such as the Tuskegee study and the Henrietta Lack’s

170). Institutional Review Boards are in charge of risk assessment for all experiments. IRBs remain aware that the situation within an experiment may take an unexpected turn that requires further review. Their goal is to ensure that the risks faced by participants within a study do not exceed reasonable grounds based on the benefits to be achieved through the research. Institutional Review Boards consider the risks to the participants and the rewarding implications of experimentation through their system of review. Their in-depth study and consideration of experiments is essential to the protection of human participant safety within the United States. Without oversight of research in the medical field, human participants would not be protected from potentially harmful

IRBs are committees that consist of 5 or more members with varying expertise and diversity that are responsible for reviewing and approving human subjects research activities on behalf of institutions.

Jona’s definition of identification is that “the most educated and motivated members of society should be the candidates for research, and their agreement must be autonomous and informed to be valid.” He believes that people who are being experimented on should have a better understanding of what exactly is being done as well as all the details behind it. Patients should not be the guinea pigs in these experiments “the most highly motivated, highly educated, and the least captive members of the society” should be the ones who are being experimented on. With any case this is only justifiable if the experiment relates to the disease. The belmont report states that there are three core principles identified, respect for persons, beneficence,

Directing and implementing research this summer has increased my understanding of the time and effort it takes to effectively accomplish a desired study. This study has given me first-hand experience into the field of research, while increasing my interest in connecting research to a part of my future career. In social work and psychology, research is constantly incorporated to evaluate social norms, effective treatment plans, and case studies. Each research study is conducted differently, but seems to follow a similar pattern of tasks and goals in order to complete a study effectively. I found myself learning the most about the research process during the submission of my IRB. Even though I have taken advanced research classes at Grand Valley State University, I have not been required to submit an IRB for our study due to the minimal harm we had for the participants. For this study, Dr. Youker and myself spent over a month developing our proposal for the IRB and found ourselves constantly critiquing the requirements needed to ensure that our participants were safe during our study. The IRB process created a great amount of stress in my research process due to the constant editing, but it gave me an understanding for why ethics are in place to keep participants safe. This process allowed me to create guidelines that included exactly types of yoga participants would be participating, ways to prevent physical harm during classes, and reflect on the process needed to evaluate

The first article is entitled “of mice but not men: problems of randomized clinical trials,” is written by Samuel Hellman and Deborah S. Hellman discusses the issues of randomized medical testing and experiments on patients. The article describes the role of the personal physician and how the physician can take an ethical or unethical path of treating his/her patients. The relationship between the patient and physician is greatly emphasized because according to the article trust is very valuable in medicine especially when a patient’s life is at risk. A Kantian and a Utilitarian view of randomized clinical trials are debated but the authors clearly steers towards a Kantian point of view.

The first ethical principle stated by the Belmont Report is respect for persons. “Respect for persons incorporates at least two ethical convictions: first, that individuals should be treated as autonomous agents, and second, that persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection” (The Belmont Report). The researcher must respect the subjects decisions and be obliged to allow them to take part of the experiment voluntarily. The second

Denis Diderot once said, “There are three principal means of acquiring knowledge... observation of nature, reflection, and experimentation. Observation collects facts; reflection combines them; experimentation verifies the result of that combination.” Denis Diderot discusses the overall way to obtain information. When wanting to know statistics, numerous experiments need to be performed in order to provide accurate results. Through the abundant of experiments performed, human experimentation is one of those tests. Upon hearing the words “human experimentation,” individuals automatically assume grotesque, immoral, and unethical tests being conducted on people. However, this is untrue because experimenting on humans is beneficial to the citizens