INTRODUCTION International Business Machines (IBM) is an intercontinental Computer Technology and Information Technology (IT) counseling company headquartered in Armonk, New York, the United States. IBM has an extensive and assorted portfolio of services and products. Expanding on its accomplishment in the 1960s, IBM sets its position as the IT industry and the business world (IBM, 2008). Jordan (2008) state, these offerings fall into classes of cloud computing, data and analytics, commerce, the internet of things, IT infrastructure, cognitive computing, mobile and security. In this paper, generic competitive strategies theory of Porter and strategic positioning of IBM US in 1992 relation to theory will be discussed. PORTER’S GENERIC COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES A company 's relative position within its industry determines if their profitability is higher or lower than the industry average. The fundamental primary of above average profitability in the long run is the sustainable competitive advantage (Powers & Hahn, 2004), which is about how a Strategic Business Units (SBUs) makes esteem for its customers both more noteworthy than the cost of providing them and better than that of competitor SBUs (Johnson et al., 2014). According to theory of Porter (1980), there are three generic strategies for reaching above-average performance in an industry which are differentiation, cost leadership and focus. Cost leadership includes most minimal operational and least costs in the target
What is our current competitive strategy (from Porter’s four strategies)? Please provide support and examples for your determination.
Operational excellence. Many industry players are facing strong competitive pressure, so cost leadership is another key to success.
Porters Generic Competitive Strategies: The relative position of a company within its industry concludes whether the profitability of the firm is above or below the industry’s average. The above average profitability of the firm is fundamentally showing the sustainable competitive advantage in its long run. According to Michael Porter, competitive advantages originate from the value of a firm and there are two types of competitive advantages, which a company can own. These are low cost or differentiation. For any company, in
4.7. Which of Porter’s four competitive strategies does apple engage in? Explain. Out of the four competitive strategies according to Porter, Apple engages in a focused differentiation strategy. Apple has been very successful by creating different products and services from competitors that are innovative, high quality, and user-friendly. From their unique product designs, to their state-of-art development of operating systems and software, Apple’s has continuously exceeded the evolving consumer demand in the current market. Furthermore, due to their open and inviting sales floor at their retail locations, genius help desk, and well trained sale peoples, Apple has welcomed more than a billion customer
Competitive strategy, after Porter, came to be defined as the strategy of a business unit which seeks to achieve sustainable Competitive Advantage (SCA). The literature on strategy deems the market-based view (MBV) and the resource –based view (RBV) as two approaches to giving businesses the competitive edge they need to compete in their industries. Aside from having competitive advantage as their ultimate goal, the two approaches are also similar in the sense that they both make use of particular tools and models in their undertakings. They also differ in numerous ways,
According to Porter (1985) a company can apply three generic types of strategies to protect itself while competitive force is a key issue of the management. To achieve this position a strategy based on competency must be accomplished
IBM needs to grow revenue and stay competitive in the dynamically changing computer marketplace of the 1990’s by maintaining technological leadership and accepting the organizational transformation which needs to be undertaken for them to excel. IBM needs to recapture their previously held powerful position in the personal computer and microprocessor markets and regain value in the company which will increase its stock value and competitive advantage in the marketplace.
There are two schools of thought pertaining to how firms should choose the competitive strategy that best suits them. One is of the opinion that firms should choose one of the generic strategies and commit all resources to making it work. Porter belongs to this category. They believe that the value chain necessary for cost leadership is quite different from that of differentiation strategy and that while differentiation deals with better quality, cost leadership deals with lowering costs wherever possible.(DESS and DAVIES 1984) What porter articulated here is that there is need for strategic clarity.
Michael. Porter defines strategic position as attempts to achieve sustainable competitive advantage by preserving what is distinctive about a company. It means performing different activities from rivals, or performing similar activities in different ways. He maintains that strategic position emerges from three distinct but not mutually exclusive and often overlapped sources, ie: variety-based positioning, needs-based positioning and access
One way to analyze the strategic potential of IS is to consider their influence on one or more of Porter’s five force model. Firstly, medium threat of entry, any company willing to
Successful use of the Porter Model Analysis includes identifying the sources of competition, the strength and likelihood of that competition existing, and strategic recommendations for the action a company should take to develop barriers to the various forms of competition (Prahalad and Gary, 1990). With the realization about intensity and power of competitive forces, organizations can develop options to influence them in a way that improves their own competitive position. The result could be a new strategic option, e.g. a new positioning; differentiation for competitive products of strategic partnerships.
Competitive advantage is explained by Mahoney and Pandian (1992) as the function of industry analysis, organizational governance and the firm’s effects in the form of resource advantages and strategies. In order for a firm to be competitive it must adapt to the volatile business environment and through strategic management decisions establish a competitive advantage that will ultimately produce superior performance relative to its competitors (Akimova 2000).
Porter’s generic strategies describe how a company attains competitive advantage across its chosen market scope. There are three generic strategies-cost leadership, differentiation and
Compaq Computer Corporation was a company founded in 1982 that developed, sold, and supported computers and related products and services. Compaq produced some of the first IBM PC compatible computers, and were the first company to legally reverse engineer the IBM Personal Computer. They possessed a large marketplace and were a severe competitor for the technical giant Hewlett Packard. Both of these organization were at a crossroads with regards to their financial futures and they were competing against the other for market penetration of the personal computer.
The generic strategy allows the firm to react to the five forces better than their competitors (Worthington & Britton, 2006). According to Porter (1985), an organization can enjoy competitive advantage by focusing on the generic competitive strategies. The organization could enjoy competitive edge by either offering the product at low cost or differentiating the product from the competitors or by focusing on a specific market. Porter (1985) emphasized that the generic strategies should be at the centre of the strategic plans.