Due to the imperfections and circumstances of life, people often times look towards other remedies to give them the falsehood that they are living in a utopian world. Sometimes, these antidotes can be intentional due to their selfish desire to have everything go their way or unintended due to a deplorable situation. Jhumpa Lahiri intelligently intertwines character development and symbols in the eclectic short stories of Interpreter of Maladies. Lahiri creates characters through symbols associated with those characters to exemplify their true desires in their lives.
A camera’s primary function is to capture photographs, but in the short story Interpreter of Maladies, the camera works to put Mr. Das in his own imaginary realm. With the camera
…show more content…
Das lives through the deception of his camera, so too does Mr. Pirzada through his “plain silver watch without a band” (30). When Mr. Pirzada Came to Dine focuses on the regular visits of Mr. Pirzada, who is living in America while his family is home in Dacca during the war. Separated from his family, he visits Lilia’s home every night to dine, and more importantly watch the news regarding the Indo-Pakistan War. Every night before eating, Mr. Pirzada takes out his watch from breast pocket, brings it to his ears, winds it, and leaves it on the coffee table for the duration of the meal. Unlike his wrist watch, the pocket watch is set to the local time in Dacca. Mr. Pirzada constantly worries about his wife and seven daughters back at home and it seems that his pocket watch serves as the only connection he has to them. Mr. Pirzada’s life is “being lived in Dacca first,” (30) as “[the] meals, [the] actions, [are] only a shadow of what had already happened there, a lagging ghost of where Mr. Pirzada really belonged” (31). The watch represents Mr. Pirzada’s longing desperation to be with his family, even though he does not know their current status as they have not written back to him in six months. Although his body is in America, his mind, spirit, and soul yearns to be with his family in Dacca and to a certain extent
Kapasi’s point of view and that of Mrs. Das, we will see some common features and differences, and above all, this is due to the fact that there are male and female points of view. Mrs. Das said how she met her future husband, how they communicated, and most importantly that she got married for real love. As many young girls, she dreamed of a strong marriage, but she ended up in an indifferent relationship with her husband, who on this trip to sees everything through the lens of his camera; she worries about Bobby and wants advice from Mr. Kapasi who is almost the same age as her father, but he has a lustful thoughts and is unwilling to understand her complex situations. As though from different angles. For instance, Mrs. Das always in her glasses and almost never removes them (338), Mr. Das sees the world through his camera (336) and he is missing the really important points that happen with his
Interpreter of Maladies focuses on communication as one of the universal themes throughout the book. The stories demonstrate how communication is the key to the success or failure of relationships. While there are instances when communication is effectively employed and therefore enabled the characters to build strong and intimate connections, there are examples of where communication was superficial or ineffectual, leading to unstable, limited relationships. Jhumpa Lahiri illustrates the importance of communication within relationships by allowing readers to experience the consequences and advantages that have developed as a result throughout the short
While outdated traditions obtain the ability to negatively impact the relationships between characters, they are also capable of creating internal conflicts within a character. In both texts, readers witness the effect traditions have on one’s morality, mental mind, and sense of identity. The occurrence of atrocious, old traditions plays a significant role in corrupting one’s morals, inducing conflict with a character’s past values. This is clearly exhibited when “Mrs. Delacroix selected a stone so large she had to pick it up with both hands” (51). The ritual itself of hurling stones at another human is a demoralizing act that should not be justified by society, and reveals her iniquitous and immoral traits as she lacks awareness of her dehumanizing actions amidst participating in the ceremony. Mrs. Delacroix picks a colossal stone amongst a variety of possible sizes, demonstrating her loss of morals and redefined focus on the power she obtains from this abhorrent tradition. Moreover, traditions from the past are
Every evening Lilia and her parents have dinner with Mr. Pirzada. Lilia says he’s going to her house to eat dinner and watch the evening news. It prepares the reader by letting them know why Mr. Pirzada will be at Lili’s house
At this moment Patria makes an emotional connection between the boy and her own son. It is the boy’s wonder combined with his adolescent figure that causes her replace his image with the thought of her own child. This thought develops the situation into a more personal level causing her to feel passion for him. The passion Patria feels for the boy’s death is a result caused directly from the rebellion within society. Moreover, the emotion of passion caused by society, becomes the catalyst for her to take action against Trujillo and the
Collectively, these literary images go to describe a young ethnic man, probably of Latin descent, who lives with his mother in a poverty stricken area. The careful recitation of instruction given to the younger man seems to demonstrate an intricate knowledge the narrators has accrued from both predecessors and experience. Singularly, this part of the story is very powerful in that it shows a young man having to hide who he is and where he comes from in an effort to seem appealing to women, and speaks volumes about the deception that both genders go through all in name of the chase.
The two short stories “Interpreter of Maladies” and “Sexy” by Jhumpa Lahiri are prime examples of literature written during the postmodern period. Each of these stories contain different tenets of postmodernism interwoven within each short story.
Symbolism is an important factor in many stories. In “Interpreter of Maladies”, the author, Jhumpa Lahiri, uses the symbol to represent her idea. In the story, the main character, Mr. Kapasi, is an Indian tour guide who accompanies the Das family on their way to see the Sun Temple at Konarak. Mr. Kapasi is an intelligent and knowledgeable man. He was once fluent in many languages but now speaks only English. He wanted to be a diplomat once but now he works as an interpreter in a doctor’s office. Mr. and Mrs. Das are young couple with three kids. Mr. Kapasi feels that they are more likely to be brother and sister to the kids than parents. The story’s central conflict focuses on the marriage situation because both the protagonist, Mr.
As Gabriel reflects on Gretta’s sorrow for this lost young man, he comes to accept that he has never experienced that depth of feeling and love for another person—not even for the wife that he had so desired just a short time before. He no longer looks at her through “admiring and happy eyes;” he now sees only her age and bitterly acknowledges that “her face is no longer the face for which [the boy] braved death” (2199). The reality of Gretta’s past has revealed the shallowness of his feelings and the hollowness in his life, and Gabriel’s picture of Gretta is forever changed.
I think the theme of this is about chaos and how Mr. Kapasi feels about this chaotic family. Everyone’s home life is different, so I think it’s a combination of what Mr. Kapasi see’s and how the family behaves. It’s obvious that these parents were either too young or too immature for children. The way that they act proves that the impression that Mr. Kapasi has could be true. It seems as if these people are so wrapped up in their own problems that they can’t get beyond what it might actually mean to be a family. It literally seemed like Mrs. Das was
In Mr. Pirzada Comes to Dine by Jhumpa Lahiri, Lillia learns that there is a lot she does not know and gains a better sense of compassion after being taught about the war in Mr. Pirzada’s home. In the beginning of the story, Lillia is a young, innocent girl with seemingly little knowledge of anything other than what she is being taught in school. When Mr. Pirzada, a man from Pakistan whose family was still in Dacca, starts coming to her house for dinner each night, she is unfazed because she had grown accustomed to her parents bringing home friends from the university. Though Lillia never went out of her way to get to know Mr. Pirzada, she grew a fondness for him, so one night when he did not come to their house, she was confused. She had never
The book Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri contains several short stories that all have to do with the conditions of human behavior that plays into the overall theme of the book. As the book progresses from “A Temporary Matter” to “The Third and Final Continent”, all of the stories’ endings noticeably have gotten lighter. From the beginning to the final short story, the situations that are placed upon those characters goes from bleak and dark to that with a glimmer of hope in what could be part of a cycle of rebirth. In “A Temporary Matter”, the ending was bleak, with little hope that Shukumar and Soba would reconcile their marriage whereas in “The Third and Final Continent” the narrator lives happily with Mala, his wife, and son. As with “Sexy”, the middle story,
Camilla, Arturo, Sammy, Vera and Hellfrick are all non-entities in the bustle of L.A. culture, but all are profoundly human in their suffering, confusion, and vices. All are battling a poor sense of self-worth and struggling to survive in an indifferent world. Arturo Bandini takes us through this story in intimate first-person, exposing us to his mood swings, his astute observations and his growth as an author and a man.
Molina chooses to escape the men’s shared harsh reality through stories and fantasies, and Valentin through his political vision and his studying, which he keeps up religiously, saying that he has to “keep up with [his] reading schedule, you know that”, as it has apparently become such a routine for him, known by Molina, that he feels unable to miss a day, perhaps worried that this will hinder his much-needed-for escape from reality.
“Everyone is a moon, and has a dark side which he never shows to anybody,” says Mark Twain. Twain’s concept shines through in multiple stories of Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri. Human vulnerability glimmers in the dark, while harsh public facades gloom over the daylight. Lahiri utilizes darkness to display true selves, personalities the individual desires to be seen are showcased using light. These devices are especially relevant in the text which is a tribute to human emotion and interaction as well as the power knowledge as on the heart. Two stories this is mainly true in are “A Temporary Matter” and “Interpreter of Maladies”.