As I read through the introduction of “Freakonomics” by Stephen J. Dubner and Steve Levitt, I’m highly dissatisfied with the way the author opens the book. Personally, I felt like it was well written, but lacked appeal. To illustrate further, the book starts with information regarding the false predictions of criminologists of crime rates. However, my feelings are slightly positively changed as I find the author exposing “the hidden side of everything”, as he claims (which is also the theme of the book). For example, as he bypasses the information of the sky-high crime rate, he starts talking about a woman who changed crime rates by legalizing an abortion (which is illegal at the time). Sequentially, he explains how the crime-drop …show more content…
Examples of this would include when Mr.Dubner and Mr. Levitt relates to the reader on page seventeen: “After all, every one of us regularly passes up opportunities to maim, steal, and defraud. The chance of going to jail—thereby losing your job, your house, and your freedom, all of which are essentially economic penalties—is certainly a strong incentive.” I strongly agreed with this statement due to the fact that even thieves did not steal something everywhere they go. They have incentives, which the author defines as “a means of urging people to do more of a good thing and less of a bad thing.” Which we also all have, which just makes me more fond of the book. This all comes down to how the parents did not have an incentive for coming to pick up their child on time. After reading that, I thought way more about incentives, and used it in my daily vocabulary often with my twin sister. Moreover, another new way of thinking this book caused was due to the common bonds of teachers and sumo wrestlers, making me compare things that should would not be naturally paired up. For instance, the other day I started thinking about what chairs and people have in common. The author showed that teachers and sumo wrestlers both cheat, a concept that boggled my mind. Due to my background and my observations, I never even dreamed about teachers or sumo
By analyzing the use of symbolism, personifications, irony and foreshadowing by the two authors, it will become evident that their protagonists share similarities when dealing with the recurring theme of the tragedy of unrequited love.
In the beginning of the story, Bradbury uses foreshadowing in the exchange between the husband and wife where the wife asks the husband to look at the nursery. The wife states, “I just want you to look at it, is all, or call a psychologist to look at it.” It is from this passage that you realize something has changed in the household that the family may need outside help to resolve it. Ray Bradbury also uses foreshadowing in the constant screams coming from the nursery to emphasize that there is a consequences that comes with over valuing material possessions. The family’s lifestyle is based around the house and the nursery and when the parents begin so see it as a negative thing, it starts to impact the family. The children believe its okay to disobey their parents and not respect what they have to say. The author also quotes “blood and death in the nursery”, this hints that the situation in the nursery is going to get out of control and eventually lead to an extreme case, being death. The author also uses “chewed wallets” and shows that because the material possessions meant so much to them they began to value them more then each other. The wallet represents all the costs that came with building the room and the fact that they were chewed shows how it negatively impacted the family. Because of the parent’s idea to
The intended audience of Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner’s Freakonomics is made up of middle class Americans and comprised of adults and teenagers with a basic education and a broad knowledge of a wide range of subjects. Since Levitt and Dubner reference a large variety of topics, it is imperative for the audience to also be familiar with a wide variety of subjects or at the very least to be aware of popular culture and government. For example, when Levitt and Dubner reference a Supreme Court case, Roe v. Wade, where a young woman named Norma McCorvey was “...the lead plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit seeking to legalize abortion” they establish their audience as one that would be educated enough to know the fundamentals of some of the most important events in American history (Levitt and Dubner 5). By referencing the Roe v. Wade case, a court case which is generally considered to be common knowledge for Americans, Levitt and Dubner reveal that their audience must be comprised of
The author Steven Levitt studied economics at Harvard University and MIT. He is primarily known for his work in the field of crime. The title Freakonomics means a study of economics based on the principles of incentives. The title is related to the book since he emphasizes how incentives drive and affect people’s actions. Although this book does not have a single theme, the main focus of the book is a new way of interpreting the world using economic tools. He explores incentives, information asymmetry, conventional wisdom, crime and abortion, and parenting throughout the six chapters of the book.
To understand literature is to not only understand human nature, but to also understand how the surrounding conditions affect humans. It is often the situation that people are placed in which drives their actions. Similarly, the Marxist approach to studying literature focuses on how certain economic conditions can affect character’s values and actions. In addition, Marxism teaches that wealth is a critical part of society, as without it many opportunities are no longer present. For example, an individual with wealth can go through life leisurely, while a person without it is subject to greater hardships. In the play A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry, the struggle due to economic conditions is evident, as the dreams and aspirations of the Younger family become deferred due to their struggles with poverty. The economic conditions of the Younger family not only lead to the deferral of their dreams, but also to the neglect of their moral values as they begin to see wealth as a necessity.
Greed and or Jealousy can lead to bad actions, choices and results. It can happen to one person or multiple people no matter what age they are. This is shown in three stories, “Ponies” written by Kij Johnson, “All Summer in a Day” written by Ray Bradbury and in “Harrison Bergeron” written by Kurt Vonnegut. In “Ponies” there are a group of girls who invited one to a “cutting-out” party. Where a pony picks two of the three thing she has to be cut off for her and her owner to join the club. In “All Summer in a Day,” the girl, Margot knows about the sun while the rest of the kids do not know about the sun - or they do not remember it. Last, in “Harrison Bergeron,” the government forced people to be equal making them wear things they called “handicaps.” In all of these stories it shows how greed and or jealousy can lead to bad actions, choices and results.
“The mother removes her purse from her shoulder and rummages through its contents: lipstick, a lace handkerchief, an address book. She finds what she’s looking for and passes a folded dollar over her child’s head to the man who stands and stares even though the light has changed and traffic navigates around his hips… He does not know his part. He does not know that acceptance of the gift and gratitude are what makes this transaction complete… The mother grows impatient and pushes the stroller before her, bearing the dollar like a cross. Finally, a black hand rises and closes around green” (paragraphs 3-5).
For example, “My Finn informed me that Gatsby had dismissed every servant in his house a week ago and replaced them with half a dozen others” (114). This infers how Gatsby uses his money to protect him from rumors by paying his servants. In addition, Daisy and Tom escaped from justice and went on vacation. This example shows how Tom and Daisy are manipulated into thinking that money can solve any issue.
Though individuals have different opinions on certain matters, all individuals have some sense of right and wrong. It is wrong to cheat on a test, it is wrong to drive without a license, and it is wrong to steal, but for some obscure reason the majority of individuals have done so. Chester Himes was the director of Special Publications for the Phelps-Stokes Fund in New York City and wrote Mama's Missionary Money. In Himes’s passage he tells of a boy named Lemual who purloins money from his mother. Lemual finds money in his mother’s dresser, and he takes coins every day until his mother realizes her money is missing. Lemual has become idolized by the neighborhood kids as he takes them out to eat and watch shows. Through the author’s use of simile, hyperbole, and anaphora the reader gets a thorough understanding that all actions have certain consequences and individuals must be prepared to face them.
A baby is born and on that day a parent makes a promise to take care of that child until the day the parents die. Unfortunately, that promise is broken once that child is 18 some early as 16 because they can legally get a job. In "The Glass Castle" Walls parents taught their kids to be self-sufficient at a very young age to reply on themselves. Being self-sufficient
The only true bias in this film is the suggestion that only kids of upper classes families were trying to rebel and commit juvenile acts. Towards the opening of the movie one of the main characters parents arrive at the police station to pick him up, the father is dressed in a dinner suit and it is learned that they had to leave an affluent dinner party at the country club' to get their son. As seen in our text and through films of this genre, it is known that youth from all social classes were lazy, promiscuous and of a delinquent mentality.
They are being held accountable being in horrible situation. For example, in “Sheriff’s Children”, Sheriff Campbell is being paid to keep Tom and his jail and not let him go. There is a angry mob wanting to kill him just because he is black. “I get seventy-five cents a day for keeping this prisoner, and he is the only one in the jail. I can’t have my family suffer just to please you fellows”(Chestnutt). In Saga, trained killers are being rewarded to capture Hazel and take her away from her parents. In “Blink Your Eyes”, man is being stopped by an police officer because he is black, he is perceived as being dangerous .He says “I could wake up in the morning without warning and my world could change”(Sundiata). He is basically saying without warning something terrible for being black can occur. “All depends, all depends on the skin, all depending on the skin you're living in.” Meaning the color of your skin determines what experiences you will receive .In A Raisin in the Sun,the influence of Jim Crow Laws is shown in the play.Through the racist neighborhoods in the play, when Mrs. Johnson degrades the youngers family, and when Mr. Lindner leaves Walter humiliated and ashamed of his
The importance of wealth is equally reflected in moments of Little Miss Sunshine. Plane tickets are unaffordable, so the entire Hoover family is forced to drive to California for the daughter Olive’s competition because “they cannot in good conscious leave behind any of their number, however much they’d like to separate” (Klawans, p.42). When they make a stop at a restaurant each of the family members must order something from the menu under four dollars, another testament to the realism of their financial means. While wealth is not the central point of Dayton and Faris’ film, the moments that are shaped by wealth resonate with the primary ideology of success in Little Miss Sunshine. To be
Throughout most people’s lives, morals will come naturally from how they are raised and how the people around them have acted. As they grow, they are molded and shaped by the things they encounter, and the final result is a moral compass shaped by experience. While this can instinctively change a person for the better, it can also make them greedy or a liar if that’s how they were raised. Once someone is influenced or pressured into making poor decisions to please the people around them or for money, it can be hard to overcome that bad habit and replace it with good morals instead. As seen all throughout Steinbeck’s The Winter of our Discontent, the people in the town have been influenced by all the others and have therefore lowered their morals for prosperity. This is seen in not only Ethan Hawley, but also Margie Young-Hunt and Allen Hawley, Ethan’s son. While people constantly try to deny their need for wealth, it always changes a person’s decisions in the end.
I really enjoyed this text because I liked the way that it was formatted, it honestly made it a lot easier for me to read and understand. And I liked how she used personal experiences to start off her passage, it gives you a feel for the author, and honestly it kind of made me feel like I was reading someone’s diary but the diary didn’t belong to just some regular kid, it belonged to someone who had the ability to think critically and look at everything in more than black and white, if that makes any sense. She explains leaving pennies around for people to find hoping they wouldn’t overlook it, and compares it to how we see things. We overlook so many things and take so much stuff for granted, and the crazy thing about it is that we never realize