America has had large expanses in technology: from the invention of the iPhone, which revolutionized how the cell phone was viewed and used, to websites like eBay and Amazon that are able to give quick easy access to whatever item that person so desires on that given day. But when an individual is purchasing an iPhone 5 or using one of these shopping websites, they rarely think about the person who work to build those iPhones or ship out those items. These “Invisible Workers”, those who work behind the scenes, rarely get the credit or the respect they deserve and are often mistreated and abused because of it. Because of society’s natural desire to consume, businesses have the ability to treat any of their workers unfairly and allows for the …show more content…
However, though the cost reduction does play a large factor for many businesses, this very reason is why the workers are mistreated. In the Simpsons “couch gag” titled Money Bart, it caricatures and satirizes the life overseas workers and the conditions they are in while also bringing to light the ways many businesses are able to get a mass amount of product out with ease. Through the video, the audience is able to see how the Simpsons is “made” and how the various products associated with the show. The audience is able to see how the creation of the DVD set through the abuse of animals, in this case the narwhal, and the abuse of mythical creatures which the audience saw at the end with the unicorn, which was supposed to signify the death of imagination while working in these conditions. While some of the gag is over exaggerated for comedy, this does properly raise questions about the many working conditions of the workers. Workers in overseas most of the time will work in factories in automated lines doing the same monotonous task day and night and the task sometimes endangers their lives. Some of the workers are children, which raises even more concerns and puts more pressure on businesses to create better safety …show more content…
Because of the fear to unionize or the fear of fighting back at all, the continued cycle of abuse does tend to continue due to inaction. But does this solely lie on the backs of the workers? In the case of overseas workers, they work hours on end in horrid conditions, their children sometimes working alongside them in order to even come close to making ends meet and it comes short even then. Anything they do can risk their job and any tiny mistake ruining the rest of their lives in this oppressed environment. So yes, out of fear workers do not tend to fight back but this out of necessity to protect their families from losing what in most cases is their only source of income. In the case of American society, the workers are hidden behind technology where consumers automatically assume everything is done by “computers”. Though American workers are treated better, they still have to contend with being replaced by machines and worry about companies taking their jobs away. While it can be said that this is due to the advancement of technology, there is no compensation whatsoever for the worker when he or she is inevitably replaced. They are forced out, without any regard for their families or their
Dexter Roberts and Pete Engardio in “Secrets, Lies, and Sweatshops,” writes about the various struggles that the United States has with production factories overseas. Wal-Mart claims they have rules for the sweatshops to follow but China still violates the labor laws by hiring consultants to give tips to sneak around auditors. The American people enjoy their everyday items at a low price, which Wal-Mart demands to the sweatshops. The sweatshops are struggling to provide these low price items to Wal-Mart and keep their working conditions humane. Roberts and Engardio explain in the article how companies that have overseas production are attempting to provide the managers and employees with skills to make the overtime required more effective.
In his opinion essay, “Sweatshop Oppression,” published in the student newspaper, The Lantern, at Ohio State University, writer Rajeev Ravisankar uses his article as a platform to raise awareness about the deplorable conditions in sweatshops. Ravisankar awakens his readers from their slumber and brings to light the fact that they are partly responsible for the problem. His first goal in the essay is to designate college students as conscious consumers who look to purchase goods at the lowest prices. Then he makes the connection between this type of low-cost consumerism and the high human cost that workers are forced to pay in sweatshops. His second goal is to place the real burden of responsibility directly with the companies that perpetuate this system of exploitation. Finally, he proposes what can be done about it. By establishing a relationship that includes himself in the audience, working to assign responsibility to the reader, and keeping them emotionally invested, Ravisankar makes a powerful argument that eventually prompts his student reader to take responsibility for their actions and make a change.
Employers should not treat their employees as a potential criminal. At the end of the book, it said, “Stop treating working people as potential criminals and let them have the right to organize for better wages and working conditions.” (238). When Barbara worked at Key West, Florida, the employer said they heard
Mattel, Inc is a billion-dollar corporation that designs, manufactures and markets a broad variety of toy products. Like many before and several after, Mattel lost their way for a short time and was caught off-guard by an investigative report aired by NBC’s news program (Sethi, Veral, Shapiro, & Emelianova, 2011, p. 486). This interview concluded that an Indonesian factory of Mattel’s was employing underage workers, who were working long hours and doing an extreme amount of overtime. Even though Mattel disputed these finding, they found it among themselves to come up with some corrective actions to make sure these types of misunderstandings don’t ever happen again (Sethi et al., 2011).
Unfortunately, employers don’t always have to hire their workers back. For instance, if they believe the union did not act in good faith, they may have the right to fire their workers. Few private employers can afford simultaneous 100 percent turnover, even temporarily, so a strike threat encourages negotiations. Today, management holds more leverage knowing that many people cannot afford the risk of losing their jobs in such a competitive economy. So instead of negotiating labor issues, employees are satisfied with what is given to them. The rhetoric of solidarity has long obscured the reality of unionism: Unions drive up wages by pitting workers against workers, insiders against outsiders (Reason).
There is a very big epidemic of consumerism within the United Sates and it is a result of the contribution of many factors within our society. It is evident that this is not necessary when one views other communities throughout the world but America has yet to make the changes it needs to solve this problem. A big problem with retailers and producers of products is their use of sweatshops, which are located in and out of the U.S. Sweatshops are a huge problem because they are known for having very low safety standards for their employees and mistreat their employees consistently. The reason they are used is because they can give the company better profits off of their goods.
Workers rights is not a usual topic in this day and age. Many people say that we have crossed that hump and it is not worry because of all of the progress that we have made. This is not true, many are denied these rights. A factory in Juarez fired 90 workers who were trying to form a union to get better rights(Document F). It is not a privilege to be able to form a union, it is a right of any worker to be able to form one. The are on the forefront of achieving change in the lives of people who don’t have a voice. It is crucial for them to have one to combat factories, a factory worker described her factory as, “the factory culture oppressive and demoralizing” (Document D). This is not far for the workers who work day in and day out on a wage
The early 19th century in America saw the rise of industry and a booming economy, however, with industry came businessmen who saw an opportunity for power and profit. Even with help from the government, it would be a long time before the American people saw an improvement in the condition of the laborers and the regulation of corporations. Fast forward to the 21st century; two hundred years have passed and people are still struggling at the hands of a corporation-run economy. Throughout history, American laborers have been at the mercy of an industry controlled by a small few that did not have the best interest of the people in mind.
Sweatshops have been around for centuries, beginning around the late 1880’s. Sweatshops are classified by three main components, long work hours, very low pay and unsafe and unhealthy working environments. Sweatshops are usually found in manufacturing industries and the most highlighted production is clothing corporations, who take full advantage of the low production costs of their products. Many may think sweatshops are a thing of the past but they are still affecting many lives across the nations. There are many ways sweatshops affect lives, but a recent article titled “New study finds ‘more sweatshops than Starbucks’ in Chicago” explains that there are many low wage industry jobs that are violating labor laws in the United States alone. The article also reports how employees who are working in such conditions won’t speak up in fear of the retaliation employers will implement. Analyzing Sweatshops through the lens of the Sociological perspectives will help us better understand the illegal conditions of workplaces that still exist today.
Why Labor Unions Are (A Short History of American Labor) Still Effective In America Today Labor, or trade, unions first started in America in 1794. They came about as a means to protect workers common interests. These labor unions were crucial in providing for fair and safe working conditions. They helped to put an end to long hours and little pay and child labor.
Businesses are continuously growing over time as technology advances and people find better and more efficient ways of production. With the expansion of a business, companies need more laborers and workers to help make their company successful. However, instead of hiring more people, business owners forced workers to work long shifts with very minimal pay. While muckrakers brought much attention to
“While a myriad of laws exist at the state and federal level to protect undocumented workers from exploitation, discrimination and abuse, enforcement is often lax and many in the legal community have turned a blind eye, or worse, have watched undisturbed while their clients commit crimes against humanity” (Lazar). The problem does not reside in the lack of laws that protect undocumented workers, but the lack of willingness from the government to enforce these policies in the everyday workplace. “The current movement of non-profit worker centers across the country—empowering immigrant workers to defend their employment rights and recover their dignity in the workplace—is a vital sign of progress. But it must be complemented with a real commitment from the public and private sector to protect the rights of all workers” (Workplace Fairness). Workers from the Tracy, California factory decided to take things in their own hands, they organized multiple protests against Taylor Farms, they set up a Teamsters accounts, and have also created an Appeal for Justice to inform the CEO of Taylor Farms, Bruce Church Taylor, of the unjust conditions that the workers suffer
As companies grow larger and more competitive, they are looking for cheaper ways to produce their wares and increase their profit. That is, after all, how companies are able to succeed, by giving their customers a comparable product for a cheaper price. This increases sales and the overall bottom line. Which seems to be a beneficial plan for both the companies and the consumers. That is, as long as the consumers don’t know how the product is being produced. The places that produce these products for an extremely cheap cost are called “Sweatshops”. A sweatshop is a small manufacturing establishment in which employees work long hours under substandard conditions for low wages. Sweatshops came about
I too agree that unionization gave many workers a voice that they otherwise wouldn’t have had. We see this in other areas as well; protests, rioting, picketing, marches, sit-ins, demonstrations, etc. I think we all remember the Occupy movement, which was part of the Occupy Wall Street movement. This movement led to groups from around the country setting up camps (for lack of a better word) within well populated areas, all in an effort to bring attention to social and economic inequality. Again, the reason we all know about it is because of the number of people involved, otherwise the media wouldn’t have covered it and therefore, it wouldn’t have been know or effective.
Have you ever think about people for unsafe work? Each in everyday, hours and minutes, as we step forward into a factory, mills or machineries, significant people are put into danger. Although health and safety in a workplace is necessary for the employers and employees, there are still a lot of injuries and deaths in a workplace. Most people we’re being forced to work even if the job is not safe for them to do so. There are people getting injured and killed every day that’s why we need to put a stop to it now and make the job in a workplace comfortable to everybody.