Imagination is a way of knowing which is defined as the faculty or action of forming new ideas, or images or concepts of external objects not present to the senses. It could be seen as a vital part of intuition however others may say that they have no correlation to one another. Intuition is the ability to understand something instinctively, without the need for conscious reasoning – similar to imagination - it is a way of knowing. Throughout this essay I will be evaluating, comparing and contrasting imagination in relation to intuition. I will also be concluding with my own inputs and ideas. Some may argue that imagination is a very important part of intuition. Intuition is seen as a form of knowledge – or more specifically speaking, a form of innate knowledge. It also has a connection to ethics and instinct, for example knowing, in a situation, what the correct or incorrect thing to do is. They may impose the question “How would we know what to do in an immediate situation if we have never experienced it?” This is where imagination would come into play. Imagination has a part in intuition as it allows us to create scenarios in our minds, even if we aren’t always necessarily aware of them. This is because imagination is associated with creativity, problem solving and originality. This helps us land on conclusions as to what will happen if you do the ‘right’ thing and what would happen if you don’t. It allows us to make the connections between the consequences and our
Accredited journalist, Malcolm Gladwell, delves into the hidden truth behind the subconscious mind and explores the psychological process of intuitive thinking, both good and bad, in the novel Blink. Gladwell’s purpose is to exploit how the unconscious works and to expose the connection between your intuition and the real world which helps educate the reader on how to develop advanced decision making skills. He adopts an informative and passionate tone in order to establish credibility with his older audience and emphasize his dedication toward his works. Through the use of rhetorical questions and repetition, Gladwell demonstrates that a thin-slice of information can be used to deduce deeper comprehension.
Most people tend to get the wrong impression when they think of “Imagination overcoming reason.” They believe that the only people that fall under this category are those with extreme fears or those who are borderline insane. Although this
This author ascribes to the empiricism paradigm. This paradigm is similar to empirical knowing in that it is based on the premise that what is known can be verified through the senses, or
Another reason imagination takes over has something to do with experience and maturity. Many people believe that, “...if you’re too young to know monsters are fake, it can be quite traumatic..” (Ringo 92). This is more logical because many children don’t know when something is real or fake just for the simple fact that they’ve never been in that situation. When people experience something that they don’t understand, we imagine that there’s no other way the situation can go but bad instead of thinking it through.
Perception is quite an important piece in real life as well. The power of perceptions is amazing how it can actually help one or bring one down. One has the power to determine the response from events. “Perceptions begin when the human brain receives data from the body’s five sense.” (Enayati, A., 2012, p.2). An example that demonstrates how perception is able to help is Victor Frankl, a Jewish psychiatrist who lived three years in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II. Frankl became aware that he had only one freedom during that time which was the freedom to determine his response for a sorrowful truth. To imagine is to have the power to decide the response to events. Frankl decided that he would image seeing his wife, teaching students about what happened during the Holocaust, and the lessons learned while being in camp.
Jacob Bronowski’s speech, “The Reach of Imagination,” provides a theory that humans are the only beings capable of imagination and memory. This theory relies on the cognitive function of visual images; while it is suggestive, Bronowski does not give an in depth representation of the memory that explains how and why it works. Daniel Schacter provides an updated theory, closely related to Bronowski, of how the brain can form and retrieve memories. These memories are retrieved as fragments; Schacter adds on to Bronowski’s theory with a psychological factor and shows exactly how people remember and interpret things differently. Though Bronowski’s theory of imagination and memory is simplistic and aged, it is still supported by Daniel Schacter’s updated theory behind the human brain and how memories are retrieved in fragments.
There are two types of ways to think in this world, one way is called intuitive & the other is called articulate. Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking by Malcolm Gladwell, is a book where we learn how we think without thinking, or rather about things that seem to just come to us without us having to do any thinking at all. A very powerful message that I spotted that was meant for the reader at the end of this book was that we should know when to trust our instincts and when to be cautious of them.
“Intuition and concepts therefore constitute the elements of all our cognition, so that neither concepts without intuition corresponding to them in some way nor intuition without concepts can yield a cognition. Both are either pure or
Christopher is at age level in regards to externalizing and internalizing of emotions. He has a tendency to internalize and then explode. The results of the survey indicate that the interviewee is well aware of oneself as an individual. The last series of questions asked searched for a series of indications that the interviewee had well developed hypothetical thinking abilities for her age. Christopher is at age level in terms of hypothetical thinking and seems to be well developed in this area. He is able to utilize inferential reasoning to come to a conclusion.
(2000) connected six reasoning caps to develop assorted qualities of intuition in understudies in Taiwan.
“Yet the absence of the imagination had Itself to be imagined” (Stevens, Wallace 2014). Here, Stevens is desperately trying to convey the message that even though imagination was slipping at
Intuitionism was developed as a reaction to Cantor’s set theory and its paradoxes. Intuitionists sought to rebuild mathematics from the ‘bottom-up’. They saw Mathematics as ‘an activity’; Mathematicians do not access pre-existing knowledge but construct knowledge (Brown 2008, 121).
It seems that intuition is inherently hard to define. But consider what a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court said about what was legally 'pornography '. The judge said, "I can 't define it, but I know it when I see it".
According to Eagleton “imaginative” is what the mind can create using its originality and exceptionality, it is something that has not occurred in real life, or cannot be claimed as something factually true. It is conceived in the minds of individuals, but not projected into real life. He uses terms like “did not exist” “literary untrue”, “inventive” to further state his opinion on what “imaginative” is. Imaginative for the Romantics had three main functions; the capability to transcend reality, to recreate memory, and to notify the creation of art.
Kant explains our knowledge of the world is based on our awareness of the world. Same goes our consciousness which gives us representations of the world: ideas of things. There are several main ideas in Kant work that I would like explore in this paper. He talks about experience, ideas, logic, and the five main human senses. He explains that in order to have an idea of something, humans first have to experience something that is similar so that they can create something new in their mind. If this does not happen, then they cannot have the idea of the thing since the idea would have no experience to gain from. For example,