preview

Is John Smith's Bias During The Trial Of Pocahontas

Decent Essays

There are many biases that are conveyed by Smith and one of the biases in particular that was prominent was Smith's rescue by Pocahontas. John Smith "had not mentioned the incident in an earlier account, A True Relation of … Virginia (1608)" (Belasco and Johnson 133). Smith could have simply fabricated the events in an attempt to advertise the colonies. Another factor that made Smith's narrative questionable was the incorporation of opinion in his narrative. Specifically, Smith described the imprisonment of a guide by the Native Americans and that "those Barbarians kept him prisoner, many strange triumphes and conjurations they made of him" (Smith 126). Moreover, it seemed as if Smith was leaning more toward a twisted story of the Native Americans as savages instead of maintaining focus on the historical facts. Smith had indeed distorted the truth as to what really occurred in the past, however, Pocahontas in particular did bring about more questions as to why Smith and others had negative views of Native Americans. …show more content…

The colonists were not remotely interested in giving up Pocahontas due to the fact they Christianized her and married her off, which suggests Pocahontas was only a negotiating tool for the colonists. The actions the colonists performed was somewhat justified since it was difficult trusting a foreign entity that was "ready with their clubs, to beate out his [John Smith's] braines" (Smith 130). The colonists feared the Native Americans and biasedly concluded that these men were all savages and could not be controlled after the atrocious act they almost committed on Smith. Pocahontas was a prime example of how the colonists felt toward Native Americans, but there were other reasons that led up to the negative viewpoint of Native

Get Access