Is There A Problem With Nuclear Weapons?

Nuclear weapons have been used twice in war – on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. More than 210,000 civilians died, while many more suffered small injuries. Even if a nuclear weapon were never again exploded over a city, there are horrible effects from the production, testing and deployment of nuclear weapons that are experienced as a personal and community catastrophe by lots of people around the world. This must inform and motivate efforts to get rid of these weapons.

The nuclear bomb is an interesting phenomenon that has captured the fascination of scholars, academics, politicians, and the media to bring curiosity and fear together. The first and only use of nuclear weapons occurred in 1945 during the Second World War, wiping out over 200,000 Japanese civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear bombs, were now viewed as the number one threat that could potentially destroy our planet and the human race. Since 1945 nuclear weapons have since been a strong threat that has imposed a psychological anxiety for world leaders as this threat has expanded to fifty countries with the

Although the first nuclear weapons were relatively small, with yields equivalent to approximately 20,000 tons of dynamite, they nonetheless shocked the world, setting off an arms and energy race that would last for decades. Today, the United States sits on top of the world’s largest nuclear arsenal. Nuclear powered submarines and aircraft carriers dominate the oceans, and over 100 nuclear power plants supply nearly 20% of the nation’s power supply (Bayh & Gregg, 2014). All of this nuclear production produced tremendous amounts of nuclear waste.

Should the United States maintain Nuclear Weapons, and if so, under what conditions? Harig, Owen Pg 1

Sirens wail, a baby cries in the background and the sky starts falling...DUCK AND COVER. Nuclear revolution is approaching and the time to prepare is now. As nuclear weapons should be feared, the should be an immediate caution but also should be regarded as a fact of security. This will be examined through the numerous nuclear weapons that the world owns; the acceptance that revolution is upon us, and finally an example pain that has striked perseverance in nations.

Nuclear weapons have only ever been used once in human history, and that was during World War II when The United States deployed missiles on Japanese territory, in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. At the time of bombing in 1945 only the USA had developed nuclear weapons, whilst today the pool of states consisting of nuclear weapons is still extremely small, with only nine states laying claim to nuclear technology and weaponry. This nuclear proliferation is explained by Darryl Howlett who explains this as the worldwide spread of nuclear weapons. For Howlett states are nuclear driven because of the ‘strategic, political and prestige benefits’ attached to nuclear weapons[1]. In the

Amid the Cold War, the danger of atomic weapons put the destiny of millions in the hands of a couple of individuals. Be that as it may, reacting to today 's difficulties, the dangers of terrorism and normal debacles requires the wide engagement of common society. The terrorists ' picked battlegrounds are liable to be possessed by regular folks, not warriors. What 's more, more than the loss of honest lives is in question: an atmosphere of apprehension and a feeling of feebleness despite misfortune are undermining confidence in American goals and powering political demagoguery (van Rensburg, Pearson & Meyer, 2015). Maintaining the United States ' worldwide administration and financial aggressiveness eventually relies on upon reinforcing the

In the year of 1945, America tested its first nuclear weapon in New Mexico. It also was the first country to ever develop this nuclear weapon. Ever since then, it has been the world’s biggest threat. Building a nuclear weapon requires great expenses, can bring fear into people’s lives and kill millions of people. Some say nuclear weapons can assist those who are in need of defending themselves, it’s true but we mustn't forget that they are still weapons and can be used with no hesitation to kill their targets. Innocent families die because of these violent devices. Is this right? Will killing solve anything? I believe nuclear weapons are killing devices and shouldn’t be used in war.

At the end of World War II, the United States of America had shown the world a level of destruction previously thought to be exclusively the stuff of nightmares. A race for the biggest, most devastating weapon had coalesced in the utility of single atoms to decimate entire cities all at once. This was a privilege of technology that the States were extremely fortunate to have, as the boon of a nuclear monopoly elevated them from a major world power to quite possibly the most capable and dangerous immediately following the conclusion of the second World War. In the aftermath of conflict however, there was little to assuage the fears that stemmed from holding such power. Having secured their place at the height of the world stage, the United States

Even though nuclear power plants threaten the health and safety of many people, nuclear energy is being used in other ways as well, which may be even more dangerous. In 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, in order to end World War II. This event was the only time a nuclear weapon was used in the history. During the first two to four months, approximately 90,000 to 166,000 people died as a result. Wilfred Burchett quoted, “When you arrive in Hiroshima, you can look around and for 25 and perhaps 30 square miles you can neither see hardly a building nor a standing human. All of them are collapsed on the ground.” Yet, having seen the destructive effects of nuclear weapons, the United States currently still owns more than 7000 nuclear weapons, in which half of them could be launched in less than ten minutes. Russia is believed to be a holder of the same number or more nuclear weapons as well. The United States and Russia are the two countries with the most nuclear weapons, but in total, the number adds up to around 19,000 worldwide. Many people do not give a thought about this dangerous situation, since these weapons are

The ongoing debate of whether or not nuclear weapons are obsolete or not is a very complex one. Numerous studies have purported that nuclear weapons no longer serve an important strategic purpose for countries such as the United States of America and Great Britain. Clausewitz stated that war and politics were inextricably linked. So the distinction between “political” and “military” viability of nuclear weapons is one without meaning. Essentially this implies that deterrence theory still works, at least between state actors. After all, no nuclear power has ever been attacked by another state, and the same can’t be said about attacks by nuclear powers on non-nuclear states.

Nuclear weapons are the biggest threat to today's world. Nuclear weapons have been serving as a threat to the enemy nations, which protects the nations with the nuclear war. It can only be used to protect the country, which could possibly destroy the earth, and it still stands as a threat to the earth. So, the best way to get away from the threat is to abolish them worldwide. Which could potentially save us billions of lives and billions of dollars every year; and they could be used in strengthening the education system or try to fix the other loopholes in our society. They could also clear the poverty in small nations. Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction and are capable of turning the beautiful earth into a graveyard in a matter

As previously stated, the reason two superpowers like Russia and the United States long for nuclear weaponry is down to the fact that frankly, they are paranoid. If you can stockpile most of the nuclear warheads in the world then surely nobody could ever harm your country. This is certainly not the case. By having so many dangerous weapons you are not only a bigger threat to terrorists but also a huge threat to your countries morality. If the leaders of a country say that it is ok to use nuclear weapons to threaten enemies then what’s to say that civilians do not do the same thing to a smaller scale? In the beginning atomic bombs were created to end the war and to save numerous amounts of lives. By this, I mean that multitudinous lives were saved due to the fact that when the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima the Japanese surrendered straight away. If they hadn’t surrendered then the war possibly would have gone on for a lot longer. In contrast to this, look at what has become of the nuclear weapons now. Instead of saving lives, atomic bombs are now kept with the intention of unnecessary mass murder. What makes the monsters that enforce the use of nuclear weaponry any different from Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot or Joseph Stalin? Even though the atomic bombs are not in use at this moment, anyone or any government in possession of these weapons have the intention to inflict large amounts of pain on vast

On July 16, 1945, at 5:29 AM, in Alamogordo, New Mexico, the world was irreversibly changed. This was day when scientists working on the American-created Manhattan Project detonated the first atomic bomb, that used the nuclear fission of plutonium to create a massive explosion. Less than a month later, the same technology was used to level everything within a mile in the cities of both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Today, nine nations are in possession of a total of 9,220 nuclear weapons, some of them being thousands of times more powerful the the bomb used on Hiroshima. Keeping this in mind, it is imperative that all nuclear weapons should eventually be abolished because they threaten to destroy the world as we know it, they cost an extremely high amount to maintain, and they increase the risk of terrorism.

On August 6th, 1945 nearly 80,000 people lost their lives instantly in the bombing of Hiroshima. Three days later more than 70,000 people died instantly with the bombing of Nagasaki (Hall). Those two events remain the only two times in history where nuclear weapons were used in warfare. Less than twenty years later the U.S.S.R tested a nuclear bomb that recorded an explosion 3,333 times as powerful as the ones dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Bennett). The immense amount of destruction that could be caused by these weapons is why the great powers of the world should come together and decided to destroy their nuclear arsenals. Nuclear weapons could easily render the entire race extinct and it is terrifying to think that many countries have the power to cause a nuclear fallout. Nuclear disarmament would not be easy, it would be very expensive, time-consuming and nerve-racking. A nuclear warhead on average costs the government about $55 million. This may seem like a lot but the U.S currently has nearly 7,000 nuclear weapons. If you included production and storing costs of all those nukes the U.S has spent about $5.8 Trillion on its current arsenal (“The Cost of U.S Nuclear Weapons”). That's an insanely large amount of money. You might be wondering if it cost that much just to get and hold on to those nukes it must be incredibly expensive to disarm all those nukes. Not really, it would cost roughly $7 billion a year per decade to begin disarming our current nuclear