On the 6th November 1945, a United States bomber flies over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The only cargo aboard that B-29 bomber was an atomic bomb waiting on its target. At 8.15am the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, taking 140,000 lives with it. Most of the 140,000 died instantly, horrifyingly the rest of the innocent civilians that were not in direct contact with the bomb died painful deaths in the four months following. They died from radiation sickness and different types of cancers. Whilst the atomic bomb is considered as one of the greatest inventions of all time, in terms of how it could protect a nation, is it really worth having numerous amounts of governments on edge at the thought of a weapon so powerful? Ronald Reagan …show more content…
As previously stated, the reason two superpowers like Russia and the United States long for nuclear weaponry is down to the fact that frankly, they are paranoid. If you can stockpile most of the nuclear warheads in the world then surely nobody could ever harm your country. This is certainly not the case. By having so many dangerous weapons you are not only a bigger threat to terrorists but also a huge threat to your countries morality. If the leaders of a country say that it is ok to use nuclear weapons to threaten enemies then what’s to say that civilians do not do the same thing to a smaller scale? In the beginning atomic bombs were created to end the war and to save numerous amounts of lives. By this, I mean that multitudinous lives were saved due to the fact that when the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima the Japanese surrendered straight away. If they hadn’t surrendered then the war possibly would have gone on for a lot longer. In contrast to this, look at what has become of the nuclear weapons now. Instead of saving lives, atomic bombs are now kept with the intention of unnecessary mass murder. What makes the monsters that enforce the use of nuclear weaponry any different from Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot or Joseph Stalin? Even though the atomic bombs are not in use at this moment, anyone or any government in possession of these weapons have the intention to inflict large amounts of pain on vast
On the 6th of August 1945 an American B-29 Bomber plane launched a dangerous atomic bomb called “Little Boy”, in the centre of the city of Hiroshima. The Bombs left 140,000 people dead and another ten thousand died later from the toxic radiation exposure.
The primary bomb, dropped on the city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, lost around 135,000 lives. The second bomb hit Nagasaki three days later and killed from 50,000 up to 74,000 deaths. In the article The View from Under the
Personally, I think that it was a bad idea to introduce the world to a weapon the can possibly wipe out the entire human race. United States shouldn’t have used the atomic bomb on Japan. See the results of the bombing on Japan, I don’t think that any country should have to face that type of bombing. Well, the Ultimate weapon is already introduced so how do we prevent countries from using it? I believe that if a country uses an Atomic Bomb/ Nuclear Bomb on another country, the country using the bomb should be banned from everything like trade, selling items to other countries and etc. That way the world can be a safe place and no one should have to worry about their offspring facing the deadly
On this day seventy years ago, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Nagasaki, killing about 80,000 people, most of which being innocent men, women and children. Most of the deaths occurred on the first day of the bombing, with tens of thousands dying over the next few months from burns, radiation sickness, injuries, illness, and malnutrition.
On the day of August 6, 1945 in Hiroshima. No one was suspecting what was to come that day. At approximately 10:34 a.m, the residents of Hiroshima will experience the absolute dominance of the Atomic Bomb. It killed over 60 thousand people instantly and the radiation killed over 40 thousand more people. The consternation of the Atomic bomb killed innocuous civilians. Three days after that, another one was dropped on the city of Nagasaki at 11:02 a.m. This bomb was significantly stronger and larger than the previous one and it killed even more harmless civilians. The lives of the people were destroyed and the survivors were traumatized. The families were also destroyed as a result of the bomb. The aftereffects were devastating and many are tumultuous about what happened. This was not supposed to be the intended effect. The Bomb was supposed to end the war and not cause grieves of the people of
On the 6th and 9th of August 1945, during the final stage of World War II, the United States (U.S) dropped down atomic bombs on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively. These bombings resulted in hundreds of thousands of
The use of the atomic bomb in world war 2 is probably one of the most controversial and infamous act of war that humanity has committed in its history. The weapon is so deadly that it hasn't been used in any war since. The nuclear weapon has caused so many problems after its creation and use. It has caused a nuclear scare which reached its pinnacle in the cuban missile crisis. Although the sacre is still prevalent today with America's recent involvement in the Syrian crisis. Some countries have even got rid of their nukes and encourage other countries to get rid of theirs to get rid of the fear. Nuclear deterrence is sucha big deal that countries are afraid of nukes, but don't want to get rid of theirs. These nukes can have devastating effects
Banning nuclear weapons may sound like a good idea, but what if all nuclear weapons were banned only to have one country secretly develop and launch one? How would the rest of the world fight against them? The bad guys by definition don’t follow the rules. Nuclear weapons can also be good for more than just attacking; they may even save lives by one country having possession of them. They can also give a country more negotiating power. Nuclear weapons were first developed in America because of Albert Einstein’s letter to F.D.R. telling him about the Germans’ attempts to make a missile powerful enough to “destroy an entire port and some of the surrounding territory.” F.D.R. then got together a group of scientists to develop one first. The
On the 6th of August 1945, the American bomber, Enola Gay, dropped an atomic bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Immediately, 80 000 people were killed. Tens of thousands more died in the following weeks from wounds and radiation poisoning. On the 9th of August, another bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki, killing between 40 000 and 50 000 more people.
After World War II, countries raced to develop and hoard nuclear weapons. Seemingly learning nothing from the atomic bombs detonated on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, nuclear weapons became necessary for smaller countries to have when their larger neighbors, like Soviet Russia and the United States, had enough to kill the world a few times over. America began to understand the gravity of nuclear arms when less predictable countries became armed similarly. In 1968, the nuclear Nonproliferation Act was signed by many nations, but through the decades violations of the treaty have been common .
The historian Spencer Weart notes "You say 'nuclear bomb ' and everybody immediately thinks of the end of the world" The escalation of nuclear proliferation in around the world, especially in the Middle East led to the fear of nuclear war in near future. Many countries built a nuclear weapon because it felt insecure from the major nuclear states or from their neighbors conventional military or nuclear capabilities such as China, India and Pakistan. Many reasons that encourage additional countries to seek nuclear weapons, but the main reason for acquiring nuclear weapons is the deterrence against any external threat and prevent external offensive that might lead to war. Nuclear weapon makes such countries feel more secure. As a result of that, more than 30 countries have the capability to build nuclear weapons (Sagan, 1999)The nuclear weapon can prevent the war because countries has nuclear weapons the ability to deter any external aggression at the same time there is no guarantee that acquiring nuclear weapons may led to nuclear war .
Nuclear weapons. The connotations involved in these two words include many grim concepts such as death, war, and complete destruction. Nuclear weapons are an explosive device which can destroy a whole country with long-term disastrous effects, while killing thousands of people in the process. Despite these weapons only being used twice during warfare during the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, the use of them had tremendous effects on the world and became an event that shaped history for many years, influencing the fear and awareness of these weapons through out the world. Even today, the threat of nuclear destruction still looms over the world with ever growing tension between the United States and North Korea. However, there is still an estimated total of 16,000 to 22,000 nuclear weapons all over the world, with the most belonging to the United States. Which leads to an important question; are nuclear weapons a useful deterrent that discourages war or a dangerous explosive that are only a plague to society?
Just over seventy years ago, there were two cities, both filled with people of differing opinions and ideas. There were many buildings, factories, and families, all interacting and being together, yet in just a matter of seconds, all this life was destroyed. A feat such as this could have only been thought of in fairy tales and legends, but here it found itself in reality. Two small objects filled with plutonium 239 and uranium 235 incarcerated two whole cities almost instantly. This was known as the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was forever ingrained in human history. Ever since political figures and government leaders have been trying desperately to make sure a devastating event like such could never happen to their country. It has been successful so far, but the general consensus is that nuclear weapons should never have been an option. Of course, to uninvent nuclear weapons is impossible, so different theories and opinions on how nuclear weapons should be handled were formed. One main strategy, called deterrence, is the idea that the threat of destruction from nuclear weapons is so frightening that they, themselves can be used to discourage countries from using them or even going to war with each other. The other main strategy is called non-proliferation. This is the effort of destroying all nuclear weapons, thus destroying the chance of such mass destruction. This idea, while optimal is not probable, and so
In a speech to the US Congress, Winston Churchill once said, “Be careful above all things not to let go of the atomic weapon until you are sure, and more than sure, that other means of preserving peace are in your hands” (1952). Although said more than 60 years ago, this quote brings up a common controversial issue argued perhaps more today than ever before: the existence of nuclear weapons. Each opposing side feels that either the existence or the proliferation of nuclear weapons will lead to global chaos and destruction on a scale larger than ever before. In a global situation like this, the United States is commonly looked to as a leader, because of the high number of nuclear weapons that they possess. In response to this, the United States should not pursue the goal of nuclear disarmament at home and abroad.
In a split second, a single atomic bomb can wipe out and level an entire city. For what purpose do nuclear weapons serve other than to kill and destroy? Therefore, nuclear weapons should not be produced, much less used, anywhere on Earth. They are incredibly dangerous and devastating to human life, cause social tension between countries during times of war, and leave toxic radiation in the environment that fatally affects nearby life for decades after.