According to the McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs, the phrase “a picture is worth a thousand words” means pictures convey information more efficiently and effectively than words do. Many people believe this to be true because pictures display concrete evidence of events that happen, they are able to “see it to believe it.” They believe that since they can see it with their own eyes, everything in the photograph must be telling the true story. On the contrary, pictures can be just as biased as textual sources of information and the photographer may not be providing the viewer with the whole story. Knowing this fact, Oliver Wendell Holmes describes this phenomenon in the following way, “The photograph is an illusion …show more content…
Jacob Riis, an immigrant from Denmark and the author and photographer of How the Other Half Lives, is no exception to this reality. Riis, in his book, tries to convince reformers to do something about the poor, urban slums of which many immigrants lived. He has many images depicting the conditions in these slums, however none of them completely tell the whole story. For example, as a Christian, Riis incorporates his moral beliefs into his pictures of the slums. Riis believed that stable families was a factor that could lead to making the slum conditions more bearable. The family and home were supposed to be a haven from the harsh work world. He photographed a family in their home, as seen on page 217, however, their home looks the opposite of a haven from the work world. Every member of the family is stretching tobacco leaves as if the work world has nudged its way into their home. Riis’ typical audience and intended audience would find this shocking because Protestants had the same belief Riis did on work coming into the home. By taking this picture, Riis wants the viewer to think that every household (if one had a residence) in the slums was like this. His purpose, to get reformers to reform the urban slum situation, prevents the viewer from knowing the truth that not …show more content…
The photographer’s angle from which he took the picture also asserts superiority over the people. This can be compared to Riis’ image of the “street arabs” on page 221 of After the Fact. Riis took that picture from an even level with the boys to express his sympathies rather than his superiorites. John Minchillo, the photographer of the picture below, seems to look down at the people in the picture both literally and figuratively. He also chose to use a picture where the son looks sad. Was this by accident? Probably not, the photographer once again wants the viewer to feel bad for the people and what better way to conjure that feeling than to depict a child appearing sad. Photography has its advantages over textual sources, but just like any article, paper, or book, the reader/viewer must take into account that the author or photographer has incorporated some type of bias into their
It is said that “The true content of a photograph is invisible, for it derives from a play not with form but with time”. This makes me think that the real content of a picture, which is what the photographer tried to express, is not evident to perceive unless an explanatory text is provided. In fact, I believe that our perceptions of pictures changes over time as the historical context do. In addition, our opinions are never fixed as they are influenced by our environment. Therefore, when looking at a particular picture at a given time, it is certain that our perception of it will be different in the future based on what happen between the first time and second time we saw it.
Jacob Riis’ book How the Other Half Lives is a detailed description on the poor and the destitute in the inner realms of New York City. Riis tries to portray the living conditions through the ‘eyes’ of his camera. He sneaks up on the people flashes a picture and then tells the rest of the city how the ‘other half’ is living. As shocking as the truth was without seeing such poverty and horrible conditions with their own eyes or taking in the experience with all their senses it still seemed like a million miles away or even just a fairy tale.
In How the Other Half Lives, the author Jacob Riis sheds light on the darker side of tenant housing and urban dwellers. He goes to several different parts of the city of New York witnessing first hand the hardships that many immigrants faced when coming to America. His journalism and photographs of the conditions of the tenant housing helped led the way of reformation in the slums of New York. His research opened the eyes of many Americans to the darker side of the nation's lower class. Though it seems that he blamed both the victims and the board forces of society, I believe that he placed more of the blame on the board forces for the conditions that many immigrants faced.
In Li’s commune, the housing was not up to today’s standard. They lived in abject poverty. There was barely any available space in the house to accommodate everyone.
The portrayal of Jacob Riis’ views through his book ‘How the Other Half Lives,’ is conveyed by storytelling and is largely made of logos, however the key component is actually ethos, like a politician running a campaign, Jacob Riis’s uses logos and pathos to create a persona of authority on the topic of the poor in New York City. I am going to look in depth on how Riis uses different approaches to convey his views to his audience: why does do some of Riis’ key texts contradict each other? Is he conscious of if? Is it brilliant?
Photography gives you a small sample of reality, but these realities have been changed to what the photographer wants to present. However as Sontag stated, “Of course, photographs fill in the blanks in our mental pictures of the present and the past.” Pictures show proof that all of the history that we learn is true, but although it confirms that, pictures does not show us the entire picture of how people felt about the situation. For example, one might have a picture from WWII and show us the setting, but does that picture really show the feeling of the people? That is why we say that photography only goes as far as to how the photographer wants to show the
Riis wrote about different ethnic groups when he was living in New York. He wrote about greedy Jews, drunken Irish, and sloppy Italians. Riis also wrote with Christian morality. He blamed the faults of the above mentioned people on the poor living conditions that they were in. Like any other photographer or author, Riis’s motive must be figured out. It was already clear that he wanted change for the slums but in his pictures, the authors of the passage describe some pictures having Riis’s Christian morality in play. Riis highlights the needs for stable, wholesome families. The picture of page 191 is an example of a non-wholesome family. The home is supposed to be a resting place but factory work made its way into the home, making the entire family work. Photos like these were examples of Riis’s motives behind his photos. The photo on page 193 called “Room in a tenement flat” showed a family portrait. The room that they were in was very crammed and Riis again shows a family in poor living conditions. Riis also photographed many children, like the ones in “street arabs” on page 195. The photo is heart wrenching and captivates any viewer because of the pitiful place they had to sleep in.
According to Document 1, Jacob Riis’, “How the Other Half Lives” was a book showing the conditions of the people living in tenements, and showed how the people there didn’t have proper air, and all of it was polluted because of the overcrowding of the small apartments they had to live in. The rooms were also really dark due to the lack of windows, and also
Jacob Riis deserves a place in history because of the many astonishing actions he did for
Riis covers many aspects of the poverty that has stricken the tenement lodgers but when talking about one end of the spectrum (poor) you also need to discuss the other (rich). With out telling people how the other half of the other half lives he's leaving out a crucial part of how people live in New York. By avoiding, that topic he's giving the illusion that all people in New York live in such cramped housing as tenements. When in reality New York was and is presently not composed of strictly tenement housing. There was a rich' part of town where the thought of not having any money was never even contemplated. In addition, where the industrial revolution only touched higher societies on positive outcomes such as economics the industrial revolution only made it harder for the immigrants to get ahead. By this, meaning, that they worked harder, got paid little to nothing, and still had to compensate for the short comings that where being pressed against them because
“The home is the wellspring of personhood. It is where our identity takes root and blossoms, whereas children, we imagine, play, and question, and as adolescents, we retreat and try. As we grow older, we hope to settle into a place to raise a family or pursue work. When we try to understand ourselves, we often begin by considering the kind of home in which we were raised” (Desmond 2016, 293). Evictions! The root of poverty? Matthew Desmond’s novel “Evicted: Poverty and Profit in America City, portrays the lives of tenants, landlords, and house marketing on the poorest neighborhoods of Milwaukee. Desmond gives the reader overwhelming evidence and revealing testimony illustrating the major impact of inadequate housing on individuals, local, and national level. Desmond’s analysis and observation of his case study enables him to portray the reality of poverty, and to persuade the readers that evictions are a major consequence, and primary contributors in the relentless cycle of poverty. Desmond build his argument using two Aristotelian rhetorical appeals, ethos, logos and inductive reasoning to illustrates the importance of ending the cycle of poverty.
Jacob Riis was a journalist who made a big impact on society during the progressive era.
The housing crisis in New York City disguises itself well, hiding in the back of commercial zones or illegal tenements. Jacob Riis, a reformer at the end of the last century, spoke through photographs of the City’s poorest neighborhoods to impress the issue upon the world. His book, How the Other Half Lives, was a cry to the public for affordable housing and livable conditions for the city’s poor. Ironically, as an October 1996 New York Times article points out, 100 years under the bridge has not created even a marginal move of progress. Contrary to the popular belief that hard work and fair play yield access to the “American Dream,?the Times article depicts the conditions of the working poor, the “all but homeless?class that exists day by day.
Not everything we see is always as it appears to be. As we focus our attention and look a little more closely we find what is presented to us has deeper value than what the surface would have us think.
How the Other Half Lives: Studies among the Tenements of New York (1890) was an early publication of photojournalism by Jacob Riis, documenting squalid living conditions in New York City slums in the 1880s. It served as a basis for future "muckraking" journalism by exposing the slums to New York City’s upper and middle classes. This work inspired many reforms of working-class housing, both immediately after publication as well as making a lasting impact in today's society. Vivid imagery and complex syntax establish a sympathetic tone which Riis uses to expose poverty to the general public and calls upon them to take action and make a difference.