James Madison 's Federalist Paper

Through “Federalist No. 10”, Madison explains his reasons for his belief that the new government and Constitution would prevail and be superior to more democratic forms of government since the representation proposed would allow for more security and would “refine and enlarge the public views” (Madison 1). The Constitution would also call for a separation of national and state governments, allowing there to be specific representation for states along with other representation occurring for the country as a whole which would take into consideration the roles of the state governments as well. This form of government, Madison argues, would make sure that the “encreased variety of parties, comprised within the union, encrease [the] security” of each party and of those represented through the government (2). Through the republic formed through the Constitution, there would be enough democracy for the people to be represented by delegates through elections and would even allow for more security since the democracy present before the forming of the Constitution was “incompatible with person security, or the rights of property” since there was too much freedom provided to the people (1). The republic, Madison argues, “promises the cure for which [they] are seeking” (1).

However, Madison explained that there are two methods of removing the causes of faction. First, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence. “Liberty is to faction, what air is to fire, an ailment, without which it instantly expires,” Madison stated. What Madison was trying to say is that liberty and factions go hand in hand. Liberty promotes a faction to grow and get more powerful. In this way, it is better to lessen liberty among individuals to provide for what is best for the overall society. If people are not free to form and express their points of view, then factions could never take hold.

From 1801-1817 there was a clear separation of the United States. The Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties were in strong opposition of one another. Though the Republicans were usually characterized as strict constructionists, who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists, both Jefferson and Madison's presidencies highlighted Federalist ideals in many of their decisions. This included Jefferson's unconstitutional decision in purchasing the vast Louisiana territory and Madison's

In the presence of a powerful fraction, there is nothing to protect the minority factions from being overpowered; that a true direct democracy would be incapable of maintaining the protection of liberty, life, and the pursuit of happiness. A large republic government will impart power to elected representatives, making the power of factions to affect the vote is greatly decreased. Madison believes that this type of government should be put in the new constitution.

In the paper, “Federalist, no.55, 372-74” James Madison, states that the issue regarding the amount of members who would be serving in the House of Representatives, created many arguments. Madison presents four arguments that were criticized against the House of Representatives. The Author’s purpose is to prove that there is no formula that can fix the ratio of representation in the House of Representatives. He states that the size of legislatures differs greatly therefore the House does not need to be confined to an exact number of legislatures. Then he furthers his argument by stating that the House of Representatives has an appropriate size where it is big enough to allow free consultation and small enough to avoid confusion among the people.

James Madison wrote an essay called, “The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles.” He wrote a section called, “Federalist 39,” which talked about publicizing the Constitution, “partly federal and partly national .” James Madison argues with his claim because it was reliable with Dual Federalism.

Although James Madison despised factions as explained in Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison believed factions were an essential part of government, that needed to be revised through careful governmental intervention. Madison was careful to ensure his vision for the country 's future would protect the given right to liberty; therefore he found in the Constitution multiple outlets for these factions to dissolve. However, the government itself was corrupt so the three branches had to be separated to prevent tyranny and be successful in stopping the dangerous factions. Therefore, in Federalist Papers No. 10 and No. 51, Madison would outline his goals for creating a more cohesive country.

He states, “In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty…” Madison agrees that each department or group should be separate and have a “will of its own.” He does not think that the branches should have a say or be able to elect members of the other branches. Madison also believed that the people should be the elected members. He also believes that the people should be able to elect every position of the government. The problem with just electing any person is that some of the branches require certain qualifications.

James Madison once said, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.” I think James Madison was saying that if men were more kind then we wouldn’t need a government. Did this quote change the government's mind on how they were running the country? And what made this quote so famous? I think the U.S. would be crazy and unorganization without my president because he did so many things before and after being president. Like he was a lawyer and that helped with justine , a author so that means he spoke his mind and, politician. I believe my president is a great president. James Madison the fourth president of the United States , nickname “Father

James Madison sees factions as inescapable due to men having differences in opinion and he feels that they need to be controlled to an extent. Madison notes in Federalist Papers No. 10 that factions are people “who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest”. If Madison were alive today he would be able to see a great deal of interest groups and communities, the most apparent ones being the Democratic and Republican parties. Madison mentions two methods for curing the mischief of factions one of those methods being remove the causes for the factions to protest towards and the other is restrict their efforts being made. These methods would not be possible today. The methods for removing the causes of protest is

In Federalist 10 by James Madison, he addresses key issues like factions and democracy, all while focusing on the usefulness of the Constitution and the necessity of a strong central government, to defend his Federalist ideology. Personally, I agree with the foundation of his arguments, especially on the topic of forms of government, as well as the role of representation in our government.

“You make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens; or if such a common motive exists, it will be more difficult for all who feel it to discover their own strength, and to act in unison with each other. Besides other impediments, it may be remarked that, where there is a consciousness of unjust or dishonorable purposes, communication is always checked by distrust in proportion to the number whose concurrence is necessary.”

The Federalist Papers were 85 essays that were published in 1787 and 1788. They were anonymous and always signed by “Publius.” Publius was actually 3 men, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay. They wrote the papers to convince the people of New York to vote to ratify the Constitution. These essays were published in newspapers throughout the state of New York. Federalist 10 was written by James Madison and was titled The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection (continued). This essay was a continuation of Federalist 9. Federalists like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton thought that if the states continued to maintain complete control, each state would become its own nation, which would leave the U.S. bankrupt. They believe that a strong central government would have the ability to stop this from occurring. Factions were James Madison’s worst fear. Madison believed that factions were what were going to keep states divided and more likely to turn to individual nations. James Madison’s opinions are correct.

In addition, Madison defined that a faction is an amount of people, whether a popular or smaller, who are combined and motivated by nearly mutual compulsion of desire, or of attention, opposing to the privileges of further residents, or to the durable and collective benefits of the public. Also he explained why the Framers took a representative democracy, a republic, slightly than a clean, straight, democracy as the system of government for our new population. He defined a "pure democracy" as "a culture involving of a lesser quantity of nations, who gather and direct the rule in individual."

Representation in the form of a republic; the best way to settle disputes between the people and the elite, is by making the elite the representatives of the people “passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country.” Madison even claimed that such an arrangement would render “the public voice, pronounced by the representatives of the people . . . more consonant to the public good than if pronounced by the people themselves.” Madison’s fear of the general public, illuminates the intended audience for Federalist 10, wealthy elites, being assured that their interests would be best served (and protected) with this Republic form of government, instituted by the Constitution. Therefore, thanks to the Constitution, the interests of the propertyless, like those of women and children, could be represented effectively by wise, fair-minded, wealthy white