James Madison 's Federalist Paper

However, Madison explained that there are two methods of removing the causes of faction. First, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence. “Liberty is to faction, what air is to fire, an ailment, without which it instantly expires,” Madison stated. What Madison was trying to say is that liberty and factions go hand in hand. Liberty promotes a faction to grow and get more powerful. In this way, it is better to lessen liberty among individuals to provide for what is best for the overall society. If people are not free to form and express their points of view, then factions could never take hold.

From 1801-1817 there was a clear separation of the United States. The Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties were in strong opposition of one another. Though the Republicans were usually characterized as strict constructionists, who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists, both Jefferson and Madison's presidencies highlighted Federalist ideals in many of their decisions. This included Jefferson's unconstitutional decision in purchasing the vast Louisiana territory and Madison's

In the paper, “Federalist, no.55, 372-74” James Madison, states that the issue regarding the amount of members who would be serving in the House of Representatives, created many arguments. Madison presents four arguments that were criticized against the House of Representatives. The Author’s purpose is to prove that there is no formula that can fix the ratio of representation in the House of Representatives. He states that the size of legislatures differs greatly therefore the House does not need to be confined to an exact number of legislatures. Then he furthers his argument by stating that the House of Representatives has an appropriate size where it is big enough to allow free consultation and small enough to avoid confusion among the people.

Federalist 10: 1. Madison justifies his concerns by claiming that factions are inevitable yet dangerous. As a result he believes that their influence on government should be limited through a representative democracy where it is harder for factions to gain power. 2. 2 differences between a republic and a pure democracy are in a republic less people represent a larger population in the legislature compared to a democracy.

James Madison wrote an essay called, “The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles.” He wrote a section called, “Federalist 39,” which talked about publicizing the Constitution, “partly federal and partly national .” James Madison argues with his claim because it was reliable with Dual Federalism.

Although James Madison despised factions as explained in Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison believed factions were an essential part of government, that needed to be revised through careful governmental intervention. Madison was careful to ensure his vision for the country 's future would protect the given right to liberty; therefore he found in the Constitution multiple outlets for these factions to dissolve. However, the government itself was corrupt so the three branches had to be separated to prevent tyranny and be successful in stopping the dangerous factions. Therefore, in Federalist Papers No. 10 and No. 51, Madison would outline his goals for creating a more cohesive country.

He states, “In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty…” Madison agrees that each department or group should be separate and have a “will of its own.” He does not think that the branches should have a say or be able to elect members of the other branches. Madison also believed that the people should be the elected members. He also believes that the people should be able to elect every position of the government. The problem with just electing any person is that some of the branches require certain qualifications.

James Madison once said, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.” I think James Madison was saying that if men were more kind then we wouldn’t need a government. Did this quote change the government's mind on how they were running the country? And what made this quote so famous? I think the U.S. would be crazy and unorganization without my president because he did so many things before and after being president. Like he was a lawyer and that helped with justine , a author so that means he spoke his mind and, politician. I believe my president is a great president. James Madison the fourth president of the United States , nickname “Father

James Madison sees factions as inescapable due to men having differences in opinion and he feels that they need to be controlled to an extent. Madison notes in Federalist Papers No. 10 that factions are people “who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest”. If Madison were alive today he would be able to see a great deal of interest groups and communities, the most apparent ones being the Democratic and Republican parties. Madison mentions two methods for curing the mischief of factions one of those methods being remove the causes for the factions to protest towards and the other is restrict their efforts being made. These methods would not be possible today. The methods for removing the causes of protest is

“You make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens; or if such a common motive exists, it will be more difficult for all who feel it to discover their own strength, and to act in unison with each other. Besides other impediments, it may be remarked that, where there is a consciousness of unjust or dishonorable purposes, communication is always checked by distrust in proportion to the number whose concurrence is necessary.”

In addition, Madison defined that a faction is an amount of people, whether a popular or smaller, who are combined and motivated by nearly mutual compulsion of desire, or of attention, opposing to the privileges of further residents, or to the durable and collective benefits of the public. Also he explained why the Framers took a representative democracy, a republic, slightly than a clean, straight, democracy as the system of government for our new population. He defined a "pure democracy" as "a culture involving of a lesser quantity of nations, who gather and direct the rule in individual."

In the presence of a powerful fraction, there is nothing to protect the minority factions from being overpowered; that a true direct democracy would be incapable of maintaining the protection of liberty, life, and the pursuit of happiness. A large republic government will impart power to elected representatives, making the power of factions to affect the vote is greatly decreased. Madison believes that this type of government should be put in the new constitution.

According to Madison, there are two ways to control a faction- remove its cause and then control its effects. As far as removing the causes of the faction, Madison believed this would destroy the liberty which is essential to its existence saying this would be “worse than the disease” and the second would mean giving every citizen the same opinions, passions as well as the same

In Federalist 10 by James Madison, he addresses key issues like factions and democracy, all while focusing on the usefulness of the Constitution and the necessity of a strong central government, to defend his Federalist ideology. Personally, I agree with the foundation of his arguments, especially on the topic of forms of government, as well as the role of representation in our government.

Madison is trying to point out that the power of the government needs to be spread out and that there needs to be checks and balances. There needs to be checks and balances in order to prevent one branch of government from gaining too much power and making decisions on its own. John Dalberg-Acton said “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." as quoted in Letters of Thomas Jefferson Concerning Philology and the Classics, Volume 137