preview

James Stevenson's Intent To Kill An Endangered Species

Decent Essays

From reading the article about James Stevenson’s case, one can certainly see both sides of the issue presented. Mr. Stevenson’s reasoning for killing a local (allegedly) feral cat seems fairly justifiable if one considers the amount of piper plovers he may have saved, which is an endangered bird species (Murphy, 2007). Even so, biodiversity is complex and cannot be simply solved by killing one species in order to protect another. Stevenson admitted intent to kill the cat and expressed a willingness to kill others if needed in order to protect bird species. Such mindset does not pose a true solution to the problem. Stevenson could have found many other ways to deal with this issue, such as taking the cat to a rescue shelter. Even so, it is hard to determine whether the man should have been convicted based on his underlying intent to save an endangered species. …show more content…

Cats, in some ways, are an invasive species. Cats are not indigenous to the United States and therefore can cause problems to an ecosystem. Even so, they are highly regarded as loveable house pets. Even feral cats are often regarded more highly than other species, as was demonstrated in Stevenson’s case. In a 2005 study published in the journal Ecological Economics, it was estimated that cats cause a total of approximately $17 billion in damages to bird life annually (Pimentel, Zuniga & Morrison, 2005). As is described by authors Pimentel, Zuniga, and Morrison, “This cost does not include the number of birds killed by pet or urban cats, a figure reported to be similar to the number killed by feral cats (McKay, 1996); nor does the cost include the many small mammals, amphibians, and reptiles that are killed by feral and pet cats (Dunn and Tessaglia, 1994)”

Get Access