Julius Caesar Character Analysis

Julius Caesar is very much a warrior and he thinks that he is above every one else and that he is more than an ordinary man. As a result he is very arrogant and takes very little notice of the people around him. As far as he is concerned, they are meaningless and not worth his time. He believes he is honourable but really is not. In a way he wants to be trusted and to be a trusted leader of the Roman people but he is very unwilling to do anything to gain trust. Ordinary people have a great deal of respect for Caesar and probably believe that he would be a good, powerful leader who has Roman's troubles at heart. Caesar probably believes those things as well but he is ruthless and he craves power. He also believes that everybody likes him

Throughout history, questions have arose about when it is right to kill someone. There are usually two sides to this argument: it is never right to kill someone, or it is better to kill one person and save thousands of lives than to risk the death of thousands of people. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, it can be argued that Caesar truly did deserve to die for various reasons. In Julius Caesar, Caesar deserved his fate because had many physical weaknesses, was too power-hungry and egotistical, and would have ultimately hurt Rome more than helped it.

He states that Brutus is just as noble and worthy as Caesar. (Act 1, scene ii). He says that Brutus cannot see what everyone else does and recognize his worthiness. Cassius and the other senators do not want Caesar to be king because they would lose all their power. Cassius is slowly luring Brutus in to do his dirty work. He builds Brutus’s confidence up to make him thing that killing Caesar is the right thing to do. Cassius is basically playing with Brutus’s head because he knows Brutus will listen. So, Brutus joins the conspirators in killing Caesar. Cassius tells Brutus that it is for the good of Rome, and that he is saving them from a dictatorship. Cassius is going for Brutus’s weakest point, his care and concern for Rome. He knows that if Brutus believes the people distrust Caesar, then he will be convinced that Caesar must be thwarted. Brutus knew that if Caesar was crowned, he would never have a chance, and he was power hungry. This is what ultimately leads to the tragedy of Julius Caesar. After Brutus kills Caesar off, he starts to feel guilty for killing his friend, thus creating an internal conflict. Brutus was so confident that the plan would go exactly as planned that he fell apart when they encountered problems. If Brutus and the other conspirators had taken more time to think things through, they probably would have been more prepared for the situation that was handed to them.

Who was Julius Caesar? Julius Caesar accomplished many things in his day, which most would consider unbelievable. He has been considered a tyrant or dictator, and some believe he was one of the world’s greatest politician. In this paper we will compare the textbook and documentation that was written around 44 B.C.E the time of his death. The documents are considered to be “primary sources”, because of the timeframe in which they were written. To get a grasp on whom, Julius Caesar really was, we need to not only dive into the primary sources, but we need to view his accomplishments. By analyzing his accomplishments, textbook, and the primary sources we can better understand just how Julius Caesar was portrayed during his reign.

“Most of the evil in this world is done by people with good intentions.”- T.S. Eliot. A seemingly good idea can quickly become a horrible one when put into action. In the play, Julius Caesar, a character named Brutus joined the conspirators in the killing of his friend, Caesar, even though he held no grudge towards him, in his mind, he is selfless by killing Caesar for the wellbeing of Rome. In his opinion, he thinks that there is a likely chance that Caesar might become corrupted with power and even though he has not become dangerous yet he might so he should kill him before it happened, that was Brutus’ justification for killing his friend. Brutus may have thought his action was selfless, but in a way it was morally questionable, Brutus is taking the life of another person because of the assumption someone was dangerous with no real evidence. He is using the fears and assumption in his mind to justify himself killing Caesar. What also makes it morally questionable is the fact that Caesar was a friend who always done right by him for the most part.A person killing someone they hate is one thing, but killing someone who’s been their friend just seems outright wrong. Altruistic motivations and ideas often result in immoral actions.

A death of a hero; the fate chosen for the protagonist in most dramatic tragedies. Though, in William Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’, there are two characters that are given this outcome; Julius Caesar and Marcus Brutus. With the most potential, the self-titled, Julius Caesar possesses the characteristics that label him as this Tragic Hero. Caesar’s tragic flaw is hubris when he acknowledges himself. The insight of others that observe Caesar, prove his high ranking. Caesar also struggles with internal conflict when he makes key decisions in the play. By examining his tragic flaw, high rank, and internal conflict, Julius Caesar is clearly the tragic hero in this tragedy.

The Shakespearean play featuring a man being stabbed 23 times to death, “Julius Caesar,” is quite unique in many perspectives, because unlike most plays, this play has a plot that deals with controversial events, leaving the bulk of the readers in a state of ambiguity and division. The scene where Julius Caesar was stabbed is ambiguous, because it is a good thing for the people, but the way he was murdered is much too brutal. Whether or not Brutus should have joined the conspiracy to kill Caesar divides the audience, since it is unclear if it was beneficial or detrimental to the people of Rome. The audience is also divided on their perception of Caesar, due to his actions that could be interpreted as both arrogance or confidence. These three points demonstrate that the play’s flexible plot line opens itself up for the audiences’ own interpretation.

Meanwhile, Cassius and Brutus are conversing. Brutus seems to be upset and guarded. Brutus implies that he wants to be honored as the king of Rome, or he might as well die. Cassius spiels, “I know that virtue to be in you, Brutus…I was born as free as Caesar. So were you…it doth amaze me a man off such feeble temper should bear the throne” (1.2.92-133). Cassius tries to persuade Brutus into believing that he is just as great as Caesar, he has the qualities of a leader. Cassius wants Brutus to help kill Caesar, but Brutus is loyal and chooses not to betray

After Caesars death, Brutus is struck with the guilt of killing his best friend leaving the audience to give him empathy. Brutus' biggest tragic mistake was that he trusted a little amount of people very much. Though Caesar was his friend, he honestly believed that he needs to kill him to save the Rome from dictatorial people. Brutus also believes in Antony but, Antony doesn’t keep up the trust with Brutus. Antony was the start of the trouble Brutus was having. Brutus also trusts Cassius because when Brutus is asked to join the conspiracy Brutus joins to get closer to

He often misreads human characters and situations. He trusts Mark Antony by thinking they are friends and that Antony has moved past Caesar’s death. Therefore, Brutus lets him live. Brutus takes it even further when he allows Mark Antony to speak at Caesar’s funeral. Cassius is very upset with the decision, but Brutus’ mind is set and he is not going to change it. He believes that all of the conspirators are killing Caesar for the same reason as he is- for the love of Rome and its people. However, what Brutus fails to see is that everyone has their own reason. Cassius, for one, is very jealous of Caesar’s power, and he wants it for himself. Cassius says to Brutus, “Men at some time are masters of their fates/ The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,/ But in ourselves, that we are underlings.” (I. ii. 139-141). Cassius is saying that they can change their fate, they can have power, but they must take action. When Cassius and Brutus are in a war against Antony and Octavius, Brutus thinks they will win. He again fails to realize that they have no money. They are essentially using money that was blackmailed, but that soon runs out. He passes over the fact that the second triumvirate is located in Rome, and has access to Caesar’s will. They can tamper with it and take more money for themselves, which they do. Brutus has a fatal flaw of naivety that leads to his downfall and

Brutus and Cassius took a chance on their predictions and assassinated Caesar to fully prevent him from ruling. This all begins with Cassius convincing Brutus that he does not want Caesar to have the throne when saying, “I was born free as Caesar. So were you.We both have fed as well, and we can both Endure the winter’s cold as well as he”(Act 1, Scene 2). Brutus is contemplating whether or not he agrees, but Cassius goes on by saying “Brutus” and “Caesar.” What’s so special about Caesar, Why should that name be proclaimed more than yours?” (Act 1, Scene 2). Cassius doesn't fully convince Brutus, but makes his ideas clear by saying “Write them together—yours is just as good a name”. Cassius gives his opinion on Caesar by comparing him to a colossus and states that they will live unfavorably. He says he will rule, not because of fate, but because of their failure to take action. Brutus does not fully commit to agreeing with Cassius and Says “I would not, so with

Despite consistent evidence, it is often difficult to determine the true character of an individual. As such, it is essential to explore a series of different sources and perspectives. However due to numerous circumstances, these perspectives are often manipulated and rendered inaccurate, emphasising the need to instead judge an individual’s character through their actions. With this in consideration, historians both modern and ancient, agree that Julius Caesar was a successful leader due to his extensive military achievements and ability to manipulate certain aspects of the Roman political system.

“Who is the real protagonist in Julius Caesar?” The two options we are presented with are Brutus, and Julius Caesar himself. Although the play is centered around the murder of Julius Caesar, I believe that Brutus is the real protagonist. Not only does Brutus have much more stage time than Julius Caesar, but his internal struggle also makes up the main part of the plot. Then, the play only ends right after Brutus committed suicide. For Julius Caesar, his main part in the play is being murdered, his corpse at his funeral, and later reappearing as a ghost to Brutus. That leaves the title of the play as Caesar’s main advantage in the never-ending “War of the Roles.”

William Shakespeare wrote his play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, so that his readers could have an idea of the lives, wars, and conflicts during the roman times.

The tragedy Julius Caesar is play that involves fighting for power. The patricians form an alliance to kill Julius Caesar and take the crown. The characters within the play change and develop in their strive for power. Their plot for the crown switches ideals and corrupts people in the process. In The tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the author is expressing that power can corrupt people through Brutus, Cassius, and Caesar's development.