Julius Caesar III Analysis

1st Sentence. Exordium - Attention Grabber: Develop a plan to get the attention of your audience. Try using a short narrative or strong example NO DEFINITIONS if you need a definition describe what that definition looks like.

A death of a hero; the fate chosen for the protagonist in most dramatic tragedies. Though, in William Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’, there are two characters that are given this outcome; Julius Caesar and Marcus Brutus. With the most potential, the self-titled, Julius Caesar possesses the characteristics that label him as this Tragic Hero. Caesar’s tragic flaw is hubris when he acknowledges himself. The insight of others that observe Caesar, prove his high ranking. Caesar also struggles with internal conflict when he makes key decisions in the play. By examining his tragic flaw, high rank, and internal conflict, Julius Caesar is clearly the tragic hero in this tragedy.

The Shakespearean play featuring a man being stabbed 23 times to death, “Julius Caesar,” is quite unique in many perspectives, because unlike most plays, this play has a plot that deals with controversial events, leaving the bulk of the readers in a state of ambiguity and division. The scene where Julius Caesar was stabbed is ambiguous, because it is a good thing for the people, but the way he was murdered is much too brutal. Whether or not Brutus should have joined the conspiracy to kill Caesar divides the audience, since it is unclear if it was beneficial or detrimental to the people of Rome. The audience is also divided on their perception of Caesar, due to his actions that could be interpreted as both arrogance or confidence. These three points demonstrate that the play’s flexible plot line opens itself up for the audiences’ own interpretation.

William Shakespeare's play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is generally focused on the assassination of Julius Caesar. Caesar valued Rome highly and did not have any intentions of abusing personal power. On the other hand, Brutus and Cassius craved power and their way of pursuing it was to assassinate Caesar. Moreover, Brutus feared that Caesar would rule as a tyrant which, he thought, would not be best for Rome. Brutus supposedly foresaw that Caesar would rule, but not with the desire to treat his people fairly.

When people read The Tragedy of Julius Caesar They might think Brutus or cassius is the tragic character with the worst flaw but in reality it is Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar was supposed to be crowned on the ides of march which is March 15th, but was instead killed. Caesar was very ambitious and because of that a conspiracy formed and plotted against him. Julius was very bold and he mostly thought of only himself which was perceived as arrogant. There were many signs that showed Caesar his death but he dejected them and solely wanted to be king. Julius Caesar was supposed to be the king of rome but his ambition got in the way and blinded him of what was happening behind the scenes. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare tells a story of how a man’s ambition ended his life.

Brutus’ trust in others and his love of Rome are his greatest faults. His tragic flaw is the trust he places in others. Brutus is easily swayed to trust Cassius when he plots to kill Caesar. Cassius uses his cunning to trick Brutus into believing Caesar is ambitious and that he is killing Caesar for the good of Rome. Cassius says to Brutus, “Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs...the fault, dear Brutus is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings” (Shakespeare Act I. ii. 142-148). Cassius is speaking of how Caesar is becoming almost like a tyrant or emperor in the aspect that he is becoming more powerful than everyone else. Brutus love Rome dearly and does not want it destroyed or ruled by a tyrant or emperor. Therefore, Brutus is manipulated by Cassius into murdering Caesar. Later on after Caesar is murdered, Antony makes a speech that is full of irony. His speech tells of how Brutus says Caesar was an ambitious man, and that Brutus is an honorable man. Antony says, “Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man… When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept; ambition should be made of sterner stuff. Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” (Shakespeare Act III. ii. 95-103). Throughout his speech, Antony says Brutus is an honorable man, and that Brutus said Caesar

. I have chosen the reassessment of a historical figure specifically Gaius Julius Caesar. I chose this topic because I recently watched the HBO TV series “Rome” which is about Rome during the time of Gaius Julius Caesar and those around him. I was interested in the subject matter and wanted to know how much of it represented the show was true. To help narrow my search I used the information from chapter 7 in our text book, mostly pages 138 and 139 explains how to “narrow your subject to a specific topic”. I will use the topic of Gaius Julius Caesar to write an informative paper about different aspects of his life. This researcher paper will be written for a general audience. Another reason that I chose Gaius Julius Caesar is because there is

Historically Caesar aspired to be a good leader, however the major factor that changed him to be a huge controversial factor was the way he usurped the throne (Julius Caesar and the Tyrannicide Debate, Miola). Caesar, “unlawfully assumed power and in so doing acted the part of a tyrant”, therefore this paints a picture of how Caesar could be seen as a power thriving person (Julius Caesar and the Tyrannicide Debate, Miola). As a result, this can then be noted to create two opposing sides of authority split into different factions, one that supported Caesar, and one that didn’t. Therefore, this created internal turmoil within the government and the creation of the assassination plan, as there was a distasteful impression of how Caesar’s rule began (Julius Caesar and the Tyrannicide Debate, Miola). Caesar’s rise foreshadows his conquest for the farfetched ideal of unlimited power as he slowly starts getting the essential “tools” by the support of the peasants. Henceforth, the assassination plan that is carried out is efficiently is seemingly justified as a context of keeping of keeping the power balance in society that Caesar had disrupted (Julius Caesar and the Tyrannicide Debate, Miola). However, this cycle of endless killings and bloodshed is seen as an endless chain in

The discrepancy between moral and ethical political beliefs have been in opposition with each other since the establishment of early political systems. The justification of actions in political society varies between ruler and subjects. A ruler might believe that certain actions are justified for the purpose of power and authority, while the subjects consider this inequitable. An argument may arise in the context of, if an individual should subject himself to the will of an incompetent and unjust ruler, because they say it is law. This is a prominent theme in the play Julius Caesar, as Shakespeare constitutes an arrogant and tyrannical leader named Julius Caesar. Throughout the duration of the play numerous people attempt to expose Caesar of his domineering and autocratic power. Among these men are two preeminent characters, Marcus Brutus and Caius Cassius. However, in comparison to Brutus, Cassius deserves to be the character memorialized and venerated as he asserts himself as a skillful Machiavellian leader that provides the ingenuity behind the plot to kill Caesar. In correlation, Brutus is perceived as the noblest Roman, yet is morally conflicted and intellectually incompetent throughout the duration of the play. This inevitably creates conflict and delays the recognition given to Cassius. Individually, the moral beliefs of each notable character can attest to the notion of who should be respected, criticized or forgotten.

Power has been known and thought of to corrupt leaders in all of history. In the story “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” three characters were affected by power. The three characters affected were Caesar, Cassius, and Brutus. If you didn’t know Caesar was a roman ruler at this time and one of the most powerful people in all of rome, he was also the Romans statesman and general. Cassius is Caesar's side man who later on starts the conspiracy group which leads to the death of Caesar. Brutus is Caesar's best friend, but he joins sides with Cassius and helps plan the death of Caesar. In this essay you will read about how money, power, and the respect of others can and most likely will change you to be dishonest or noble, or even successful or distrustful.

Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, set in the first century BCE, explores the conflicts of Caesar, Brutus and Cassius, as well as Antony as they vie for power during the age of Classical Rome. Caesar’s ambition is often times questioned and he labeled as a tyrant on multiple occasions, causing many conspirators to rise up against him. However, Caesar is presented with multiple warnings and omens to caution him of his impending death. Throughout his play, Shakespeare uses the repetition of Caesar overlooking these omens and supernatural events to establish Caesar’ s arrogance and insensibility as a leader.

Julius Caesar is a play about the death of Julius Caesar and how his death affects the Roman Empire. The play was written in 1599 by William Shakespeare. Even though the play is about Julius Caesar, the main character isn’t Julius Caesar, but really is Brutus. Brutus deals with internal conflict during the play because at first he doesn’t want to cause any harm to his emperor but Cassius convinces him that the other senators and he should do something about Caesar. Cassius is another senator for the Roman Empire who does not like Caesar, and was the one who first brought up the idea of harming Caesar. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the character of Brutus, who loves country over friendship, is manipulated to kill his friend

Throughout the course of society, political leaders and individuals with authority have either led their followers to great success, or towards misery and tyranny. In society, great leaders have been able to not only change the landscape of the region they abide in, but ultimately change the viewpoints and understandings of individuals across the globe for the better. On the other hand, leaders with ill intentions have led their followers towards mischief and suppression of not only their physical being, but also of their mental state. In William Shakespeare’s world-renowned play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare illustrates the political, power struggle between the prodigious leader of Rome, Julius Caesar, and Brutus and his conspirators.

“ A hundred years cannot repair a moment’s loss of honor”. In William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, Brutus tragic fall of honor leads to his downfall because of his choice to kill Caesar, and believe that it was okay to kill Caesar. In the beginning of the play, the story sees Caesar celebrating the win against the enemies of Rome and being crowned soon the king of Rome. The story then cuts to Brutus talking to Cassius, here is the first place seen Brutus talking about wanting Caesar out of power. Cassius is at first no convinced, but soon sides with Brutus. Soon after, Brutus as figured out the plan to kill Caesar and puts it into action. After killing Caesar though, Antony sees the death of Caesar and is at first furious. Brutus leaves the place Caesar death, to go out and tell the people of Rome that this death is good. Brutus leaves the scene, but Antony then comes to also talk about the why the death of Caesar is bad. Brutus has lost his honor for killing Caesar and now has lost the power of the people of Rome. Brutus and Antony then fight with their armies, with Antony being on the winning side and Brutus fleeing. Brutus is now realized that he killed Caesar for no good reason and that he deserves to die because of his actions. He is soon found dead by Antony and his army, seen as a man who regained his honor because of his actions, he will be buried like a captain of the military would.

Ask just about anyone and they can tell you that they are familiar with the name, Julius Caesar. More than likely, they will either recall the actual person that can be studied in a history class. If not, a very popular play written by William Shakespeare. In a history class, one might learn about his many roles he played with the military, government, and politics. If one were to watch or read the play, it would be easy to acknowledge the power struggles to win a title of ‘ruler’ of Rome. The play ultimately allows viewers to learn how Caesar was eventually betrayed and then killed. Julius Caesar is a well-known character that has been and will be studied for years to come.