What are the options Katherine of Alexandria investors? Katherine of Alexandria Ltd was originally created with the purpose of producing, marketing, and distributing eventually the film “Fall of an Empire: Katherine of Alexandria’”. With the film initially earmarked for UK release in April 2015. In exchange of a contribution to achieve these goals, investors were offered a proportionate percentage of all royalties generated from films showing after release. The premise was certainly unique from an investment perspective, but it seems that Katherine of Alexandria Ltd may have broken major FCA rules. Running into trouble The FCA concluded that in their belief the investments that were offered were likely to be a collective investment scheme (CIS). Generally, a CIS …show more content…
This is largely because the film failed to deliver a strong financial comeback through VOD and direct to DVD distribution. In fact, the film was generally considered to be “flop” due to poor critical response. Outlook for investors There are several options available to investors if they choose to act upon them. Firstly under section 26 of FSMA, you may be entitled to recover money or property paid or transferred under the agreement with Katherine of Alexandria Ltd. Additionally this includes compensation for any loss sustained as a result of parting with it. Secondly, you may be able to reverse any contract in place with Katherine of Alexandria Ltd, should feel that this would be beneficial to your claim. Finally, you can seek independent legal advice clarifying your position under the FSMA. As the scheme was not authorised by the FCA, investors are not able to have access to the Financial Ombudsman Service or Financial Services Compensation scheme. Section 19 of the FSMA broken
When it was realeased Newsies at first received negative to mixed reviews from critics and audiences and was a box office bomb, failing to recoup its 15 million budget, But soon became very popular and widely liked.
view? I think it was a good movie from an entertainment standpoint, but it fell short in
Over the years, the movies made millions and the fans loved them. The work Paul Walker put in that movie will live on in our hearts forever.
The Yale Endowment is known in the financial industry as a pioneer in using a combination of innovative asset allocation and active management to produce impressive long-term performance. In fact, the Endowment produced a 17.8% average annual return, net of fees, in the ten-year period ending June 30, 2007.1 This performance is particularly impressive given that, in recent years, the Endowment portfolio has carried less than a 40% weighting in equities. Instead, under the leadership of Chief Investment Officer Dave Swensen, the Yale Investments Office
• Contracts were exchanged on 2 May 2005 for the purchase of property for $2,130,000 between the plaintiffs and the first defendant.
Notwithstanding, many people in show business at that time just wanted to work with Welles on anything creative, he was still that popular, even though he was underappreciated by the studios. This production was going to be run independently by Welles, who despised studio producers taking control of a director’s artistic work. He made it work, was a very meticulous as a director and writer, and did everything under budget and on time. However, Universal Studios felt the film was a disaster, unwatchable, and didn’t make sense of the plot.
My Greatest Accomplishment The Louisiana Purchase was probably the best accomplishment I will achieve because it set the young United States on the path to become a great continental power and to the world. It took a lot of thinking and planning to do. When I came across many of these problems I really had to decide what I was going to have to do. I will have to disobey a very important document that I helped create or not accept the offer from France.
In fact, Bruce Willis’ films usually bring in large amounts of money are box office hits, but Hudson Hawk apparently was a flop and a big loss. Who could have predicted that?
In chapter 2: Equity, Deborah Stone’s main arguments centered around challenges dealing with distribution of goods or services in an equal matter and how one should choose a distributive method. Stone’s first argument was about memberships. Stone argued the problem with memberships are you really don’t know who should receive representation in a political system. To argue this point Stone used the example about the struggles of African Americans during slavery and during Jim Crow.
As the board of directors with Rogue Atlanta we have been chosen to select three of the ten grandchildren to inherit, the CEO, Mr. Douglas Magorium’s 30 million dollars. The three beneficiaries are to follow.
The studio’s executives were in shock after watch the movie that looked fantastic and it was an epic on a grand scale, but there is no way the studio could commercially release a film that was over five hours long. Frazier being forced to cut the film becomes two hours long. The movie was shortened, but now it made no sense. Characters appeared and disappeared randomly, the plot was impossible to follow, and the dialogue did not make sense at a several key points. The film was disaster. The reviews of the film were terrible, and audience stayed away in droves. On a total outlay of $90 million, the studio recouped less than $9 million. The studio releasing the five and a half hour version of the movie, but it made no difference to the overall financial results.
Though the starring actors have plenty of box-office power, the acting was mediocre at best. The film should have been called the Charlize Theron movie, because let’s face it; the movie was all about her dramatic portrayal of the evil queen. Theron’s performance was so strong that poor Kristen Stewart just didn’t have a chance. The stunningly gorgeous Theron, made it hard to believe
An investment firm with the name of J.D.Williams, Inc. helps many of its clients invest over $120 million for the last 40 years. We have many personal investors helping many individuals with their investments. We create personalized plans for our clients depending on their needs. Our company has multiple methods to help its clients with investments. We use many different approaches when it comes to assessing and making an appropriate plan for the investment.
A movie’s greatness is often measured by its monetary returns. There are numerous examples of huge commercial successes that are able to draw dollars from people with each iteration of their product even when the movies themselves are less memorable. Think of Fast & Furious or Transformers, hugely popular, even producing a great movie from time to time. Less often, is a franchise that produces a string of great films. Star Wars and James Bond have consistently brought viewers to the box office over decades. Many of those movies will be watched by generation after generation. Then there is the oddity, the financial dud that gets better ratings with time. The Shawshank Redemption didn’t impress on opening weekend. It didn’t have a surge after a limited release with great reviews. It did have a compelling story and superb acting providing the viewer an emotional experience. That experience allowed The Shawshank Redemption become one of the most well-regarded movies of recent history.
A trust who share a common financial goal which pools the savings of a number of investors.