preview

Kingsford Legal Centre: Case Study

Satisfactory Essays

On my visit to the Kingsford Legal Centre (KLC) I was firstly challenged to remain professional by a conflict of my morals and my ethical obligations. Client 1 was seeking advice on his charge regarding drink driving, which I find morally wrong. In hindsight, I can see that between getting my brief and meeting Client 1, I applied Parker and Evan’s three stages of ethical decision making to this conflict (2014: 16). I had to become aware of what Foster refers to as ‘subjective bias’ created through socialization, and use critical thinking to recognize that I was judging the client through my preconceived values (2003: 34). I could then apply my personal morals which obligate me to be respectful of those I am providing service for, and the Australian …show more content…

Client 2 needed an interpreter, which meant advice was more difficult to convey and took much longer due to the need for translation. The ASCR 7.1 requires that solicitors give clear and timely advice to allow for informed choices. This is also in the spirit of the Legal Professional Uniform Law (LPUL) which includes an objective in s 3(d) to empower clients. My solicitor employed an ethics of care model of lawyering by engaging the interpreter in ensuring that the client understood the legal advice given in order to empower the client (Parker and Evans 2014: 46). Clear advice empowering the client promotes public confidence in the justice system and the KLC (Mew in Baron and Corbin 2013: 99). Less time may be needed to explain legal advice without an interpreter, but a matter may be more complex or the client more difficult. It is clear that effective lawyering will involve clear advice, though models of lawyering such as responsible lawyering may not focus on empowering the client to the extent my solicitor achieved (Parker and Evans 2014:

Get Access