Krugman Summary

Carney, Timothy P. (2009). Obamanomics : How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses .Washington, DC, USA: Regnery Publishing, 2009. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/ashford/Doc?id=10364572&ppg=13

The influential Paul Ekman is known best for his contributions to the field of psychology, in regards to the study and research of evolution of emotions and facial expressions across time and cultures. Ekman was born on February 15, 1934, in Washington D.C, where he would be the second child to his jewish family (Hunter). His parents were an attorney and pediatrician who lived in New Jersey for most of his life, but Ekman continued to move to other locations in the United States throughout his lifetime, including California, New York, Chicago and more (Contributions). In his teenage years, his mother began to succumb to her severe mental illness, sparking his interest in beginning a career in the scientific community in order

Krugman starts off his essay by painting the picture of his younger days in a rather fair and middle-class American society. The theme of his writing is centered around policies with the power to reverse the extreme economic imbalance the United States has been challenged with. The excessively divided American economy contradicts the basis of America’s birth: “Ever since America’s founding, our idea of ourselves has been that of a nation without sharp class distinctions- not a leveled society of perfect equality, but one in which the gap between the economic elite and the typical citizen isn’t an unbridgeable chasm” (Graff, Birkenstein,

Gail Collins, an American writer known for writing under the opinion pages for the The New York Times, has turned the recent presidential debate, into something comical. In Gail’s most recent articles, “How Could Anyone Vote for Trump”, “The Dark Days of Donald Trump”, “Don’t Take Donald Trump to Dinner”, and “The Debate in One Scary Answer”, her purpose is to show that Donald Trump is not qualified to become the next president of the United States. In these four articles, her audience is the general educated reader that will be voting in the 2016 presidential election. Gail Collins has a recurring pattern of using the rhetorical modes; illustration and description. In addition, she uses the rhetorical strategies; metaphor, dialogue, and contrast

The builder of this seventeen room Greek revival mansion was Stephen S. Speakman. In the early 1840s, the elderly Speakman fell in love with a much younger woman, Sarah Bush, whose father owned a slave-holding plantation in Kentucky. Upon asking her hand in marriage, his bride-to-be refused to marry him unless he built her a southern plantation-style mansion. In 1845, with the use of his father-in-law’s slaves, Speakman erected his mansion on a five hundred acre plot next to Loughery Creek with every brick baked on site (Historical Marker Project).

As the 2016 US Presidential Election rapidly approaches, Americans continue to stand divided by party lines, with the moderates being tugged on both sides, with hopes that swaying them will put a candidate in office. However, in this critical moment that recurs every 4 years in the nation’s history, the dichotomy is drawn even deeper between the Republican and Democratic parties, with candidates on either side suggesting radically different solutions to the nation’s problems. Paul Krugman, a famous American economist, would support Hillary Clinton for the 2016 National Democratic Primary and the 2016 Presidential Election due to the unrealistic growth expectations Republicans are promising, the healthy economic policy liberals support, and

In the article “Trump and the Plutocrat’s Hubris,” from the Wall Street Journal, Joseph Epstein writes an objective piece entailing misconceptions regarding the Trump administration. He argues against the preconceived notion that having a lot of money, leads to an effective government. He uses instances from his own life that help prove his point and convinces the audience that what he is saying is the truth. In order to effectively propose his beliefs, Epstein utilizes rhetorical questions, critical, and informative tones.

Throughout the article, Krugman’s diction is displayed in a colloquial manner, often using terms such as “flub,” “wimps,” or “hacks,” in order to not overwhelm the reader and attract a wide-range audience. On occasion, he also dictates formally to highlight the negatives of the current and “incompetent” administration and their lack of commitment. Krugman’s syntax also contains the

And it’s often startlingly bad, for two reasons. One is that wealthy, powerful people sometimes don’t know what they don’t know — and who’s going to tell them? The other is that a country is nothing like a corporation, and running a national economy is nothing like running a business.” While Trump might be a very successful business man that doesn’t mean that he will be successful at running the economy, because as Krugman said running a national economy is nothing like running a business. He then talks about how trump said that our wages are too high and sort of hinted at wage cuts.

In an incredibly long winded and organized chaotic way the author manages to bore his audience with repetitive “dumbed down versions” of what could have been described as a three part system of good, bad, and not caring. And whose view can never be fully fulfilled only with an understanding of given little reasoning can these parties come to an unreasoning middle ground. Sure you could have said this in a much easier way but there’s no American polity without boredom.

Krugman uses facts to drive and support his articles, even supplying the source of the evidence such as the “recent report by the investment firm Lazard,” and this allows the audience to draw their own conclusions, but he does not forget to include his opinions, for instance in his article, “When China Stumbles,” he admits “that [he’s] not as relaxed about this as the above analysis says [he] should be.” This input of opinion often leads to his articles being more emotional. For example, in his article, “Michigan’s Great Stink,” Rick Snyder’s insensitivity towards the public provokes Krugman and he insists that, “you wouldn’t expect controversy about spending enough to provide key public goods like basic education or safe drinking water,” which

For example Buffett states, “And to those who argue that higher rates hurt job creation, I would note that a net of nearly 40 million jobs were added between 1980 and 2000. You know what’s happened since then: lower tax rates and far lower job creation.” Bringing to the attention of the audience that we are in a current financial crisis, and to make matters worse we have a high unemployment rate. Signaling that this is a problem that needs to be resolved by some response from the audience being the government. Another problem Buffett bring to the audience mind is how we the people are losing our faith on our government to handle our fiscal problems as he states the following; “Americans are rapidly losing faith in the ability of Congress to deal with our country’s fiscal problems. Only action that is immediate, real and very substantial will prevent that doubt from morphing into hopelessness.” Again reminding our government that they need to take action not only quickly but also considerable to the public before its too late and the people become hopeless on our government.

Krugman (1999) had strong opinions about unsold commodities and unemployed workers. He was deeply concerned about both of them, and talked about how tragic it was to see those things take place. But, which one is worse - the unsold commodity or the unemployed worker? That is a matter of opinion, and there are several arguments that could be made when it comes to how one feels about those issues. Losing one's job would appear to be a tragedy, especially in an economic climate that is uncertain, because finding another job could be very difficult. However, some would say that staying in the mainstream is not always the way to go, and losing a job could be the catalyst for change that could change someone's financial and work life for the better (Taylor, 2004). Krugman (2008), though, was more concerned about the return of a high jobless rate. What would happen to all those people who lose their jobs? Where would they go, and what would they do in order to survive financially? How would they support their families?

Debates - these battles of mental fortitude and intellectual dexterity are arguably the cornerstone of a thriving democracy. Picture this - a latino social Democrat from Los Angeles observes a flooring critique of the distinguished saltwater economist Paul Krugman delivered by Niall Ferguson, a famous Harvard economic historian. What he notes, aside from Ferguson’s eloquence, is Ferguson’s attempt to remain intellectually honest as he discusses political polarization occurring in the modern political system as it relates to macroeconomic realities. A palpable dearth of political distortion surfaces in Ferguson's ideological argument as he describes both modern “caricatures of austerity and caricatures of stimulus.” For those unfamiliar, austerity

In the novel Ungifted by Gordon Korman, takes place in Academy of Scholastic Distinction in the middle of the book. It tells the story of Donovan, a troublemaker who wants to stay hidden from the massive mistake he made by knocking down the statue of atlas. Dr. Schultz is trying to hunt him down, so in order to achieve this goal, first, he has to go to the Academy and try and fit in. When he gets to the Academy, he is not greeted well. Lots of people want to see him leave because they think he is not smart, but eventually they get use to him and like him. Then, Donovan is having a hard time fitting in because his teacher think he has a talent. He was doing well until his teachers were seeing that he wasn't outstanding at any subject. While