Levels Of Security Risks And Methods Of Mitigation

internal and external users to whom access to the organization’s network, data or other sensitive

As Figure 2 displays, companies are already taking measures to implement security controls for the security risks mentioned above. As daunting as the security risks mentioned before may seem they can be managed and controlled effectively. Although, implementing these security controls will take time and is costly for companies to do.

As such, our company’s people resources pose the greatest risk for security breach. Our way to help mitigate risk in this area is to keep communication lines open in this area and to continually mandate security knowledge training, with mandatory updates on a regular basis. When the employees are informed of company policy when facing a security matter, they are better equipped to act in the best or right way. In this way knowledge is power – or at least empowerment to act in the best interest of the company’s information security.

To understand the role(s) of a Security Manager, a person must know what security is and what it means to an organization. According to Ortmeier, “security may be defined as a public or private service-related activity that provides personnel, equipment, and creates policies and procedures designed to prevent or reduce losses. These losses, caused by criminal action as well as by noncriminal events resulting from human error, emergencies, man-made and natural disasters, and business intelligence collection by competitors”. (2009).

Opposite to what some might believe, according to BOA’s Smith, “senior management is not the biggest hindrance to better security. Rather, the middle management might represent one of the largest challenges because they impact the organization daily.” Many organizations find it difficult to stay in compliance with different government laws and regulations like Sarbanes-Oxley Act and HIPAA in addition to Payment card industry Data security Standards. It does not help the fact that there is a scarcity in security professionals who have the technical and engineering skills that know how to explain the risks/rewards and the trade-off and can sell solutions within the organization.

The Main Purpose of Security Management and Security Measures must be Commensurate with the Threat

A comprehensive safety culture present at all levels within an organization, with transparent and dependable leadership can make a significant contribution to the Defense-in-Depth principal. This can promote the vigilance necessary to recognize both the potential and/or actual safety issues as well as the dedication and communication required to address them.

Identify what you see as the main purpose of security management and discuss what is meant by the statement that ‘security measures must be commensurate with the threat’.

A secure “enterprise”, big or small, should have an approach to security that is comprehensive and end-to-end if it is to be effective. Most organizations do not have such policies and practices in place. There are some good reasons for this; security clearly comes at a cost. This cost can be measured not just in dollars, but also in complexity, time and efficiency. To make things secure, it is necessary to spend money, perform more procedures, and wait for these procedures to complete (or perhaps involve someone else).

The input of the shareholders involved in the decision making process is a key element to the success of the implementation of our security prevention program. The feedback from employees will assist in identifying the best recourse in attempting to stave off insider threats to secure our information networks. For example, stakeholder meetings should include representatives from each section affected by this potential threat. The governance committee should include the program manager, assistant program manager, senior operations officers, team leaders and Senior U.S Army personnel. The meetings will be open forum based which will assist in resolving issues, setting goals, and prioritizing tasks to ensure a smooth implementation

Good security management requires risk management to mitigate or reduce risk to an acceptable level within an organization. Security management’s objective is to protect the company and its assets. A proper risk analysis will identify the company’s major assets, threats that put those assets at risk, and estimate the possible damage and loss a company may endure if any of the threats were to become real. With a good risk analysis, management can determine the type of budget they want to set to mitigate threats. Risk analysis justifies the cost of the countermeasures against the threats and determines the benefit or worth of security

Security risk management is “the culture, processes and structures that are directed towards maximizing benefits and minimizing disbenefits in security, consistent with achieving business objectives”. (Australia, 2006) And where

In this paper, I have discussed risk communication and risk management. In the first part of the paper, I have identified and explained the risk communication management and its significance. Later, I have discussed the importance of risk communication for security managers in any organization.

Security plays a major role in both the business and government worlds. We will discuss the legal aspects of organizational security management. Discuss both the positive and negative influences regarding organizational security. We will also be discussing what consequences will both business and government operations have to overcome if they fail to achieve security goals and objectives. The value private security management brings to businesses will also be discussed.

To assist achievement of the safety-first culture mentioned above, the authors developed a research model to measure overall performance. This model utilizes three data points to research an organizations safety performance. The first data point utilizes upper management and leadership as antecedents. Antecedents are individuals that indirectly affect the behaviours of the entire organization in regards to knowledge, skill, or motivation (Neal and Griffin, 2002). Antecedents are normally considered as upper management. These antecedent individuals are normally the organizations Company Executive Officers (CEOs), or Directors.