I think the libertine is such a common and enduring character in literature and culture because its roots are founded in misogyny, an even more common and lasting practice. Being a libertine could easily be a fantasy for many men. When looking at it from their perspective, there doesn’t seem to be any real downside to being a libertine. So in thinking about a libertine it is an interesting pondering to wonder what men would ideally like to be libertines. I think it is far too easy to characterize men who would like to be libertines as men who have no moral regard for women or their wellbeing. Granted some men who desire to be libertines do fall into that category of misogynists, however, I think there is somewhat of an unnatural draw to becoming a libertine.
You might also incorporate current issues around public displays of visual art or the advantages and disadvantages of government-supported art.
Ray Bradbury’s writings were influenced by the current and past events happening in a war stricken society. Bradbury draws direct correlation between Hitler’s acts in World War II (WWII) and the acts of the “firemen” in Fahrenheit 451. This leads to the discussion of the censorship of the public in Fahrenheit 451, how this compares to the censorship enforced by Hitler in WWII, and how censorship affects the public of any society. Ray Bradbury was successful in illustrating the theme of censorship within a society under a totalitarian government using repetition, symbolism, and bildungsroman in Fahrenheit 451.
Revolutionary era intellectuals attempted to create a new American culture by defining the foundations of a great republican government, stressing the need for a national language, and outlining the basis of a republican education system. Cultural views in the 21st century still value some of the core beliefs of the revolutionary era intellectuals but most values have been reshaped throughout history.
Many of the main ideas behind the literary movement of Romanticism can be seen in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. Although the dark motifs of her most remembered work, Frankenstein may not seem to conform to the brighter tones and subjects of the poems of her husband Percy Bysshe Shelley, and their contemporaries and friends, William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Mary Shelley was a contemporary of the romantic poets. Despite this apparent difference, Mary Shelley was deeply influenced by the romantics, and the reader of Frankenstein can certainly identify a number of characteristics of romanticism in this novel. Some critics have argued that Frankenstein is actually more sophisticated than the prose of other romantic writers, as
In a society where the government practices censorship and the people embrace conformity, Guy Montag risks everything in the pursuit of knowledge and individuality. In Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, the government imposes censorship through the outlawing of books. They enforce this law through the use of firemen, such as Montag, who are employed to destroy books and the houses in which they are found by incineration. After meeting Clarisse, a strange young woman who lives next door, whose insatiable curiosity inspires him, and witnessing the suicide of a passionate bibliophile Guy Montag decides to risk everything he has in the pursuit of
Fahrenheit 451 is about a man named Guy Montag who is a fireman in the distant future. His job is to burn books for a living, if books are found they are burned and their owner is arrested. In his society people do not read books, enjoy nature, spend time by themselves, or even have meaningful conversations. I think the best way to describe the theme of this story is anti-censorship, censorship is the practice of officially examining books, movies, and suppressing unacceptable parts, in Fahrenheit 451 society has evolved to such an extreme that all literature is illegal to possess.
Have you ever The world-famous movie, Remember the Titans, cost $30 million to make in the year 2000. This documentary will demonstrate the importance of the allegories to modern times, and will not be as costly but will display an equally as important message and theme. Many themes present in Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” and Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 are shown to be relevant today. Since Plato and Bradbury both emphasized the negative effects of censorship on society, modern times must become aware of how it affects their everyday lives. To prevent modern society from facing the same problems as the allegories, we must demonstrate the dangers of censorship to educate humankind.
In our world today, books are legal and loved by the people, and firemen put out fires to keep people safe. It’s different in the world of Fahrenheit 451, firemen burn down houses, and books are illegal because it supposedly makes people sad. Guy Montag is a fireman who decides to rebel. In the novel “Fahrenheit 451”, author Ray Bradbury illustrates to the reader that a society that is built on censorship can not exist without resistance of the people. This becomes clear to the reader when Montag realizes how important books are and how unfair and cruel the laws are about books and what they do to people that have books in their possession.
Throughout American history, literature has been used to bring social injustices into public view. One successful example of this was anti-slavery work written before and during the Abolitionist Movement. Abolitionist literature began to appear predominantly in 1820. Until the Civil War, the anti-slavery press produced a steadily growing stream of newspaper articles, periodicals, sermons, children's publications, speeches, abolitionist society reports, broadsides, poems, and memoirs of former slaves. These works, initially a grass roots effort, led to increased support for the end of slavery. Through the use of vivid imagery and life experiences these authors were able to show their readers the crimes against humanity caused by slavery.
Since 1886, the first thing people saw as they came to America was the statue of liberty and Ellis island. These sights let them know that they had reached the land of freedom and had a chance at the American dream.
‘If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever’ O’Brien explains to Winston whilst torturing him near the end of Nineteen Eighty-Four. It is this sense of oppression which Orwell and Bradbury both portray in their novels. Oppression can be defined as the, ‘cruel or unjust use of power or authority’. In Nineteen Eighty-Four there is quite a clear sense of cruelness and totalitarianism, whereas in Fahrenheit 451 there is a less obvious sense of oppression. Both writers were contemporaries, writing just after World War II and the horrors of Nazism, as well as during Stalin’s oppressive regime in Russia. These events would have greatly affected their writing. The three key aspects needed to achieve oppression in these two novels are ignorance, censorship and technology. Accomplishing these three goals result in successful oppression and also helps with the problem of obedience and loyalty.
2) Did the oppression of free thought in 18th c. France help or hinder the development of the Encyclopedia? Would the writers have worked so hard if they hadn’t been trying to subvert the status quo? Or would their work have been more powerful if they had been supported by the culture of the day?
A concept of freedom (or liberty) has been the foundation of the United States since its founding in 1776. After all, its Declaration of Independence states that every citizen deserves the rights to “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”. However, “Liberty” doesn’t just mean a literal freedom from captivity, or the right to live independently from the rule of a monarch. The Constitution preserves multiple different types of Liberty, including the freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of the press, and many more.
Locke speaks of man and man's role in the social contract, Pateman takes "man" literally
Feminism has come a long way in helping many different aspects of society. Some even consider feminism good for men, as well as women. While feminism of course erases what it means to be a woman, but it also erases the rigid masculinity that it means to be a man (Noble and Samakow, 2016). By keeping men in a bubble where they are expected to be emotionless and to be making the money in the family, society is limiting what men think they can do and affecting how they see themselves if they don’t adhere