preview

Liver Observation Report

Decent Essays

To confirm, the P-values of the liver and the kidney is 0.003, this value is less than the null hypothesis of 0.05, as the value is greater than the null hypothesis it rejects the hypothesis depicting that the liver and kidney fractions are not the same. The comparison of the liver cytosol with the liver mitochondria enables us to determine the activity between the cell fractions, the calculated P-value, 0.0012, that disapproves the null hypothesis as 0.0012 ≤ 0.05 indicates that there is no relationship between the cytosol and mitochondrial fractions. Furthermore, the similarities in the Liver mitochondria and the kidney mitochondria activities of 0.109 ≥ 0.05 supports the null hypothesis, accordingly outlines a relationship between the liver and the kidney tissues in the mitochondrial fraction. Lastly, the kidney cytosol and the kidney present low levels of GST activity in the mitochondrial fraction, compared to the cytosolic, this indicates that the metabolic reactivity of the enzyme is more favorable in this specific location of the tissues. (evidence) …show more content…

The given data had the potential to reduce reliability, therefore the untrustworthy data has been eliminated in this experiment. The mean and standard deviation has been displayed in a table and histogram. The regression analyses that were below 0.95 were eliminated as an example of significant outliers to produce more consistent and reliable results as well as other data that has had an immense difference in the range. The outliers were selectively eliminated as the results are better removed than kept. Even though the sample size has been relatively reduced (13 population size) compared to the initial (), in this case it is more reliable to have a small sample size with consistent results, than a large population with considerably different ranges that could highly influence the overall

Get Access