Long-Range Shooting Ethical

Many people consider hunting dangerous. This is not necessarily correct. Before any person is legally allowed to hunt in most states, they must undergo a required

Explanation: Shooting accurately is not only the key to successful hunting, but it's also a safety factor. Some incidents, often deadly ones, have occurred when stray bullets have hit people out of the shooter's sight. Be sure you have a proper backstop before you shoot. Accuracy is also

The Ethics of Gun Control The phrase "Gun Control" means different things to different people. One bumper sticker states that "Gun Control means hitting your target." However one defines gun control, the mere mention of it brings controversy. Opposing sides have for years fought over the laws that govern firearms.

Hunting has been ingrained in American history from the Native American tribes and from when the first settlers arrived to the New World. While hunting is not needed for survival in today’s society every year thousands of hunters take to the woods in pursuit of their quarry. While many people think these hunters are all the same there are two main sects that make up the hunting community; gun hunters and bowhunters. While both methods of hunting are similar and share many common points, there are some key differences between the two as well. While bowhunting is more challenging and the less popular of the two methods, and being less popular is often seen as a bad thing, bowhunting’s lack of popularity and increased challenge is what makes it the true pure form of hunting.

Stricter gun control is essential as current gun control laws have loopholes that are used by individuals to acquire weapons without any sort of background checks. Those who wish to avoid checks often use loopholes such as the Brady bill loophole. This gun loophole has been described by a correspondent from CNN stating, “In 1986, the Firearms Owners' Protection Act opened the doors for licensed dealers to sell from their own "personal collections," without background checks, and the loophole became entrenched” (Mara, 2016, para. 4). These so-called, ‘licensed dealers’ do not inherently have to check for any form of ID or background check to deem a person able to handle a firearm. Surprisingly, private dealers are not even deemed liable

These “hobbyist” are able to sell the guns to ANYONE, these kinds of purchases need to be monitored.

Hunting is one of America's greatest past times, and this upcoming weekend is going to be the annual opening weekend for gun hunting. Even if a person has no intentions to harm other people with a firearm, accidents do still happen. In the US, over 1,000 people are accidentally injured or killed in hunting accidents each year (Lin). This is far too many and something needs to be done about it. Guns have proven to be a danger in society and the final step to prevent any negative gun scenarios would be to ban firearms all together. Many people have very strong opinions about this topic and while speaking to a hunter, he stated,” banning guns would completely go against the 2nd amendment, and people would start to riot with the banning of guns.” Many people may disagree with this new law however it would without a doubt save thousands of lives. Guns give people the power to kill, and that is a responsibility that America can not handle.

The tragic and horrifying news of a homicide or mass shooting immediately leads to the discussion of a longley debated issue, which has divided Americans for many years: gun control. About thirty thousand Americans die each year as a result of firearms (Doeden 7). People begin to question whether it is morally right for civilians to own guns, and if so, what types of restrictions should be placed on guns. This year, the deadliest mass shooting in American history occurred, leaving fifty-eight innocent people dead and over five hundred more injured. Stephen Paddock, the shooter, was found dead by police in his hotel room with numerous high-capacity firearms used in the assault on twenty thousand concert-goers (Lalami 1). Today, Americans

How is it right that anybody can obtain a firearm? Why is it even possible that there could be such a thing know as that “gun show loophole” with so many death happening in America? If somebody with mental issue would want to get a gun they would easy be able to get one. That person would just need to go to a gun show and find a firearm they like, and purchase the gun from a private individual at the gun show. Most states that have gun shows don’t require the buyer to do a background on them, only twelve states require background check on all purchase at a gun show, and only seven states only require background check on handguns sales (Gun show). The seller would only have to make sure the buyer has a gun licence to purchase a gun (Gun show).

The topic of gun control laws has risen to become one of the most controversial ethical issues of the twenty first century in the United States of America. The US is world-leading in terms of gun ownership, according to a 2012 Congressional Research Service report, per 100 residents there are “112.6, meaning there is more than one gun for each American citizen” (Krouse). This means that there are more guns in the US than in any other country, with over double and even triple what the next closest countries have. There are two perspectives to this ethical issue, those for and against stricter government gun control laws. Activists who support stricter

The American Gun Laws should be stricter. There are many deaths every day due to guns not being in the right hands. Thorough background checks should be given on every person and the age limit to at least own any gun is 21. More gun control laws would reduce gun deaths. The Second Amendment, “The right to bear arms”, isn't an unlimited right to own guns, and it was intended to protect the right of militias to own guns, not individuals. Also, high-capacity magazines shouldn't be owned by civilians, because they don't need weapons that can kill a mass amount of people. Civilians, including hunters, should not own military-grade firearms or firearm accessories. They are simply not needed, and put others at risk of harm. No one should be hunting

Chairmen against illegal Guns 4 Federally-authorized guns merchants (FFLs) must require every buyer to complete ATF Form 4473, which incorporates questions about whether the buyer is denied from purchasing a firearm.14 One inquiry asks whether the individual rounding out the structure is, truth be told, the genuine purchaser of the gun There is no need to steal a gun because people can straw purchase, which is when one may act as the buyer of the gun and then give it to someone else. A straw buyer may be utilized when the real purchaser is denied from having guns, for example, an indicted criminal or a person who is under 21 years old. On different events, the real purchaser of the gun may not be a denied individual, but rather does not need the guns to be recorded in his or her name. There is the possibility of guns owners losing their rights because of regulations forced as a result from criminal use of deadly weapons. I would not say that I am for or against gun control. I believe there should be regulations to an extent, but not when it takes away from citizens who do not abuse

Gun control has been a controversial topic for many years now with all the massive shootings going on and the high number of murders happening without selfdefense. In the second amendment in the United States constitution it gives us the right to bear arms so we can be protected and feel secured in this country. Nevertheless, this presidential election can be very crucial for the N.R.A with Donald Trump in favor of allowing us to carry firearms, but on the other hand Hillary Clinton has made it the “centerpiece” of her campaign. Trump has been ignoring the lethal topic of gun control and seems to be more fixated on the seemingly smaller chances of terrorist attacks in our nation. Trump is the N.R.A’s only hope of not having any further changes towards gun control, Trump states that “It’s a necessity to be armed for the next gun spree.” The real question is why would anyone sell weapons that have been used in war be sold in any ordinary market?

As a video game company Activision does not have the usual responsibilities that other companies have. Petrol companies and other mining/energy companies have a responsibility to the public to not do unnecessary harm while

Everyday thousands of animals are brutally murdered by people that participate in the recreational activity that is hunting. Hunting is an activity that involves a person attempting to kill or trap an animal. Hunting is mainly done to animals in the wildlife and often in cases are used for food, clothing, recreation or trade. In my opinion hunting is morally wrong.