Louis XIV And The Criticisms Of Absolutism Analysis

2) An argument should be focused on winning over an audience rather than beating them

b) Often talks to his team with sarcasm when they question his methods and sometimes blocks them out all together

Option D: The focus of the argument is to discredit conspiracy theories, not provide support for the number of them. The amount of theories is briefly discussed in the introductory paragraph.

Part 5: Connect the argument with facts that prove your points. Note the areas of objections and offer concessions if needed.

A Comparison of the Characteristics of the Absolutist Rule of Charles I of England and Louis XIV of France

Louis XIV, the ruler of France from the late seventeenth century to the early eighteenth century, claimed, “I am the state.” He considered this to be absolutism. His goal, also acquainted with absolutism, was, “one king, one law, one faith;” Furthermore, Louis wanted to promote religious unity, royal dignity, and security of the state. In order to achieve this goal, he had to rule with a firm hand, laying down the law for all to see. Louis XIV’s absolutism fostered in four major parts: the building of Versailles to control the nobility, the breeding of a strong military, the improvement of France’s economy, and, while quite harsh, the brutal extinction of religious toleration.

b. The character I chose is Eric Harris. Eric’s outward and physical appearance is like every

Introduce the second main point of the argument. Then, provide evidence from the sources. Multiple pieces of evidence should be provided to support the main point.

13. Which of the following is the best strategy for linking evidence to your ideas in an argument? (Points : 5)

B. My purpose is to persuade my audience that police brutality should be regulated with greater strength and objectivity.

d. Your personal philosophy, values or ideology about the balance between civil liberties and national security in the context of an unending war on terror.

B. is not correct because Johnson was a Southerner and a Democrat, and known to be a previous owner of slaves. He is also know to be the one of the most racists Presidents ever, constantly clashing with Congress over bills of protecting ex-slaves and bills against black codes (laws that held the principles of slavery). He never held the South to his own standards, and had a "hands

4. After that, I want you to tell me who defends their point better, and why.

Before Richelieu proposed this revolutionary theory, the nation-states throughout the European continent had consistently relied on other means of protecting interests, forming alliances and projecting power throughout the continent. This concept was based on the religious belief of countries and was upheld at all turns. Given that the ruler of any given country, be it of a Catholic or Protestant majority, had the right and responsibility to decide which religion the general population would pursue. This capability was famously coined at the Peace of Augsberg and stated “Cuius regio, eius religio”, which roughly implies the ruler chooses the religion. This concept was continuously upheld throughout the 1500s and until Richelieu transformed the status quo through Raison d’Etat.

The purpose of this document is to state how originally there was equality and how it should remain like that. How inequality should come to the surface and have a solution found to it. The first document by Thomas Paine where he used biblical evidence to state that monarchy is not natural or something that you prefer. This document exist because during this period, they had kings and queens. Thomas Paine wanted to let people know that mankind was originally in a state of equality.