preview

Love Canal Case Study

Good Essays

toxins in the Love Canal area, action by the local city and state was slow to come. When reports were beginning to show that children were coming down with rare cancers and genetic anomalies, parents demonstrated and went to Albany, burning lawns, and taking political actions.7 The state eventually took action and purchased the polluted properties, and residents were moved to new homes. This also marked the start of extensive federal and state government cleanups of the toxic Love Canal area. This time period saw accountability of large corporations for polluting communities.7 Other studies during the late 1970s and early 1980s were also being conducted in and around the Love Canal. By this time the government was carrying out its own investigations …show more content…

The decision of habitability at the EDA by the DHHS was questionable based on the results of the monitoring studies which raised doubts over the levels of toxic chemicals detected and those not detected. Additionally, there were also doubts over synergistic health effects of multiple toxic chemicals seen in low concentrations. 4. The OTA analysis of the EPA monitoring study data provided limited, but not conclusive, indication that there may have been contamination in the EDA by toxic chemicals from Love Canal. OTA was able to examine only those data for chemicals known to have been disposed in Love Canal, as compared to the much larger universe of data analyzed by …show more content…

As stated above, the results showed no evidence of an increase in lymphoma or leukemia. There was a statistical significance of 5 percent in the Standardized Incidence Ratio (SIR).8 The New York Cancer Registry showed that the SIR was statistically significant at 5 percent level for female liver cancer in the period from 1955 to 1965. The statistical significance was calculated based on poisson model. Incidentally, these same residents with liver cancer did not reside in close proximity to the Love Canal.8 The SIR was calculated from cancer registry data and census tract population estimates of each cancer site by dividing the observed number of cancer cases in the Love Canal tract by the number expected for that census tract.8 The expected numbers were calculated by applying the annual age, sex, and cancer site incidence rates for New York State to the tract population.8 Respiratory cancers for Love Canal Residents did however show high levels in the same data analysis. However, there was no statistical difference seen when compared with respiratory cancer rates from residents of census tracts in Niagara Falls city. There was no clear explanation for this finding. Some limitations of this study include the fact that some residents of the affected area may have moved out and where not included in this census. Additionally, the fact that

Get Access