Marion Full Custody Case Study

Maintaining a chain of custody on evidence is essential to preserve the integrity of the evidence. When the chain of custody is broken, the evidence becomes unreliable. Without reliable evidence, a person who commits a crime can’t be convicted. Chain of custody issues appear in many cases. One such case, is OJ Simpson’s murder case (People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson). He was trained in 1994 for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.

Child custody have been an issue for many years but no clear rules have been established until approximately in the 1970’s. In the early colonial years, the arrangement was unappealing to children and their mothers and possibly doing psychologically damage. Luckily, history has evolved and children’s well-being has become a priority in divorce cases.

This amicus brief reflects the balance between psychology and law by applying them both to decide which is the best option for child placement. The law states that the child should be place with a relative when possible. However, the attorneys are also reaching out to see what effect this could have on the child psychologically. They are using them together to decide what location would be the best for Arnes. The law does state that they should place with a relative when available, while also referring to the fact that a preexisting attachment to a family could also be the same. They refer to what type of damage could occur, if it is short term or would cause long term complications. The law itself is written to allow for interpretation

With fault based divorce in the 1960s, child custody depended primarily on the child’s age. If the child was under seven years old, also known as the ‘tender years,’ the mother would receive physical custody. This was because of the belief at the time that women are good caregivers and it was their job to take care of the children at home. However, if the children were older, custody would be granted to the parent of the same sex. Sometimes judges would also award custody of children dependent on martial or sexual conduct of the spouses. When custody was awarded in this way, the presiding judge could be more focused on the rights of the parents than what is best for the child in that situation. Either way, it was quite noticeable that child custody was based on the judge and their opinion, which could change from case to case.

On 9-17-17, the unknown male child's grandmother Faye; asked me to look at the child back. The child's left shoulder blade had a scar. The scar appeared to like someone used their two middle fingers and dug into his skin. The child was bleeding and scared. The child's grandfather (unknown) did this allegation. Faye called the child to come to her. The child was afraid to come to the grandmother. Faye stated told the child "I am not going to do anything to you." The child finally came to Faye. The child did not seek medical attention. The child's mother *(Santana) was not at home. It is unknown if Santana knows about this incident. Also, they are rumors going around that the child is being molested. It is unknown by whom. It is unknown if Santana

Before I start I would like to thank every single person that has helped me during this difficult process. I am writing to request a permanent hardship reassignment to the port of Orlando (MCO). At this point, I have run out of option and my child custody situation is only getting worse.

The other thing that is right in some ways is when the court gave the little girl back to the real parents, but it is also wrong because the little girl did not want to go back to her parents because she was with the foster parents since she was an infant. So it is going to be hard on the little girl to get to know her real parents when she was with the foster parents for 9 years.

In 1997 the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) created the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) to replace the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), which was created in 1968. Like the UCCJA, the new and improved UCCJEA served the purpose of “deter[ing] the removal or kidnapping of children, eliminat[ing] interstate jurisdictional competition, and prevent[ing] states from relitigating custody decisions from other states.” (Ehrlich, p. 411) Since its creation, the UCCJEA has been a major go-to reference for Courts in all states except Massachusetts and Vermont, who have not yet adopted said act, when considering the technicalities of jurisdiction for child custody cases.

Summary: It is the most stressful part in anybody’s life to fight a case for the protection of your children. The Family Lawyer for Child Custody Denton TX does a fabulous job for the protection of children legally.

On 2/3/17, Hennepin County Child Protection accepted a report of alleged neglect, failure to ensure education for Frederic Davis III and father Frederick Davis. Per reporter Frederick III has 14 total full unexcused absences from school. Per reporter also indicated the Frederick III has 17 excused days total. Per reporter a principal letter was sent home on 11/10/17. Per reporter further indicates Frederick III has been suspended for behavioral reasons.

DR4 Complaint For Custody Petition is a form intended to request the custody of a child due to various reasons not favorable to the child/ren. The petitioner must specify his/her relationship with the child and seek custody of the child based on the options provided in DR4 form. Attaching the most recent orders by the court/s is indispensable as an evidentiary proof of the cases mentioned in section 5 and 6 of DR4 form. You have to be very specific for mentioning the cause of the petition for the custody of the child/ren along with your choices of interactions of the child/ren with the other parties involved in some or the other way. The document DR4 also has the provision for seeking insurance and financial support for the child/ren through the court order. File form DR4, Complaint for Custody before the honorable judge of the Circuit Court in your county.

About 3 weeks ago, mom came from Texas to get the children. Mom said she has full legal custody. Dad had the children for a two month time period for 2-3 weeks. He wouldn't let the mother know the children's whereabouts. Dad had the children because mom asked him to step in and help enroll them in school, buy uniforms, and school clothes. Dad took the children and ran with them. He didn't enroll them immediately but when he did they went to Woolmarket for two weeks. He took them out and 3 weeks later enrolled Elizabeth at Bay St. Louis-Waveland Elementary, Haley at North Bay Elementary, and Alexis at North Bay Waveland Middle. Mom said she had to enroll Elizabeth at Bay St. Louis Waveland Elementary. When they did go to school, they only had one uniform to wear

Harm Statement: Hennepin County Child protection received a report of alleged physical abuse and domestic violence involving Tionne and Tavin by their father, Tejuan.

I decided to go through the courts to determine custody because of several reasons. The first reason was because my son’s father was on the birth certificate and, the police stated that if he took my son from me, it would be considered kidnapping. So, it was in essence to protect my son first. Secondly, it was part of the process of getting child support as well as my restraining order. The restraining order was done through the civil courts and, the originally gave me full custody temporarily until the actual custody process could begin. While, I was planning on going through the custody court at some time, I had to begin the process early because of several court standards. Before I was able to put my son on CCAP, I had to put his father on child support or else I would be noncompliant with their orders. Also, with the severity of the reasons for the restraining order, the judge believed that it was necessary for me to begin it immediately. But, going through the process, I understand why many young mothers like me do not go through the courts to deal with this manner.

Divorce is hard on everyone, but no one is as devastated as the children. For this reason, the family law and child custody attorneys at Woods, May & Matlock work diligently to help families resolve their issues without going through a litigious process. Court is stressful, expensive and time-consuming. Our team of family law and child custody attorneys look for ways to help families reach a compromise without an ugly courtroom battle. For anyone looking for a family law attorney or child custody attorney in Frisco, TX who truly puts the health and well being of the family first, Woods, May & Matlock is the team to call.