Markingson's Unethical Research

Have you or anyone around you ever been involved in an experiment that some would call unwanted or unethical? Perhaps maybe even it happening to young children, It may surprise you how often unethical experimenting has been documented throughout the nation no less worldwide, and no less to very young children. This has been happening for years throughout history and still even today. However, this is a very highly debated topic as what someone would constitute a certain experiment unethical, others may count it as perfectly normal. Whether it is the case of Dr. Lauretta Bender, or the ever so famous case of the University of Iowa Speech therapy experiment, you are sure to find various amount of cases of unethical

The Willowbrook research also contributed to the public debate over research ethics and the impetus for regulation” (NAP, 2004). This research does not downplay the egregious acts of the research or coercing family members or guardians to consent to the research study through allowing entry into the school via the experiment venue. The residents of the school suffered while being exposed to a live hepatitis virus and while living in severely unsanitary conditions with undertrained and unsupervised staff that performed acts of violence on residents of the school. “Children were sitting on the floor, some nude covered in feces, rocking back and forth making pitiful sounds. Willowbrook was a state school, yet there was very little education happening. This was simply a dumping ground for the city’s unwanted children. The staff, overwhelmed and under-supervised, resorted to prison-style control tactics: disruptive residents were confined in solitary ‘‘pits’’ and left for hours or were beaten with keys and sticks” (Starogannis & Hill, 2008, p. 89). Evidently the research setting was not the optimal setting; the research was performed during a time when guidelines were nonexistent. Protection of the residents was put aside to reach for a vaccine that would aid many more than were affected which places into question the ethical behaviors of the determining entities.

The National Association of Social Workers states “The primary mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well-being and help meet basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to the needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living in poverty” (NASW, 2017, p. 1). Social work has always been around due to the constant reality of poverty but was not an actual job title until Jane Addams a Quaker woman in 1889 opened up her organization the Hull House. She began drawing attention to the needs of people in America by getting involved with politics with the goal of introducing laws that would help people in need. Before Jane Addams brought attention to the issues, churches were doing their best

Thomas Tryon’s debut novel, The Other, tells a tale of harrowing macabre and psychosis that haunts a New England family. The Other follows the life of a set of young twin boys and the horror that follows. In The Other, Thomas Tryon crafts a story of delusion and insanity, one that preys on the readers’ fear because of the story’s normalcy and familiarity.

I was purely shocked after reading about Willowbrook State School. I believe that they violated all four ethic principles of medicine: respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. Respect for autonomy mean protecting the patients right to make their own decisions (Harrington, 2015, p. 297). First of all, the patients themselves were mentally handicapped children and were not able to make their own decisions. Second of all, the parents were not given proper informed consent because not all information about what was being done to the patients were disclosed. Nonmaleficence means that providers should "do no harm" their patients (Harrington, 2015, p. 297). This was violated when they purposely infected the patients for experimental

This study brought up a lot of unethical controversy because the researchers knowingly didn’t treat these patients, even after an effective cure of penicillin was discovered. Not only did the researchers not treat these patients that they had promised to treat, they also never told them what their actual disease was. They also never informed these subjects that their disease was spreadable, therefore infecting and affecting more people than the just the people who agreed to this treatment. The whole study was based on a lie from the beginning and it was also at a time of the depression, leading these people to be at last resort and a lack of money. At the time, there was a lot of racism and these African Americans believe that they were being useful and wanted to help as much as they could, according to the lecture. These African Americans were uneducated and may not have had a clear understanding of what was going on or what they were reading and

For example,it say, “Before the Board of Regents announced its decision, the negative press about Southam’s work had gotten the attention of the NIH, which funded his research and required it's investigators to get consent for all studies involving humans.” Another example,it says, “Beecher published a detailed list of the twenty-two worst offenders, including researchers who'd injected children with hepatitis and others who'd poisoned patients under anesthesia using carbon dioxide. Southam’s study was included as example number 17.” These pieces of textual evidence show how NIH found Southam and other scientists were doing unethical

“Clifton doctors stopped giving out the pills that worked?” The doctors of Clifton started to slack on the medicine jeopardizing everyone's life. Denying patients medication that could save their lives should not be a part of the experiment unless those people have knowingly consented to it. During the news report on the television, Miles Clifton made it sound like it was a big mistake but it clearly wasn’t since he was the one who asked the doctors to slack on giving out the medication. He lied about everything including the fact that he was behind it all. No man is above the law, and all people that break the law should be held

At that time there was great flux in research oversight, so it wasn’t illegal though it was unethical to conduct a research without informed consent. A new law on Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent went into effect few days after the blood collection. So the family’s informed consent wasn’t gotten before they started conducting the research. They didn’t just cause them the pain of a needle stick, they invaded their privacy by uncovering their genetic information. The Lacks never knew what was going on, no one explained what the test was all about even if Hsu had claimed to have explained to Day. It was obvious that he never understood anything because of his lack of education. The family thought they were been tested for cancer, and there isn’t such thing as a test for cancer. Deborah kept

MSN news reporter Zachary Fagenson wrote an article discussing the events that occurred this past week at the Fort Lauderdale airport. Fagenson focused on the chargers the 26 year old ex military Esteban Santiago may face in court, as well as giving an overview of Santiago’s life and mental state.

They deceived them for 40 years by making them think they were receiving treatments for “bad blood” when in fact they were withholding treatment. However, in present day, researchers must comply with guidelines and undergo a review panel to be approved. Participants must be informed of the study and its risks as well as the right to decline participation at any given time. The subjects must also be competent and be able to understand what is happening in the experiment as well as its

An enormous wave crashes into your boat nearly tipping it. The howling wind tosses the boat from side to side. Lightning strikes the stern sending you into darkness. The next morning you wake up to a calm, quiet sea ready for smooth sailing. Somedays the water is perfectly still making for easy travel, yet other days you have to endure a restless, unforgiving sea. This is how the road of life is perceived. The seas my father has conquered has taught me that life isn’t always smooth sailing.

Andrew Abramson believes that a conversation is needed to occur about inequalities and injustices in our country. Andrew wrote about how our views for our flag and patriotism is different for every person but, our respect and our honor need to be a constant of our different views as part of our responsibility as American citizens. Andrew believes that this respect and honor needs to extend to eliminate our prejudice actions and disrespect to the various races in America, specifically native americans.

Brandon Sanderson is a fantasy and science fiction writer, who is very successful in what he does. Starting at the very beginning, Sanderson was born December 19, 1975 in Lincoln, Nebraska. Throughout school he never liked reading the books his teachers would give him. Until 8th grade his reading teacher gave him the book “Dragonsbane” by Barbara Hambly. He fell in love and he began to become an avid reader. He enjoyed reading books from the authors who wrote about science or fantasy. He went to college to study chemistry, but soon left for his mission in Seoul, Korea. Brandon got back and realized he didn’t miss chemistry. While going to BYU, he became an English major. Although his mother wished he would be a doctor, he found love in writing. Working at a front desk of a hotel making little money, he wrote 7 short novels. Brandon

In my opinion, I find what Krugman and Giles did very unethical. I believe Krugman and Giles didn’t care about all the children whose parent that didn’t give consent. I feel that Krugman and Giles treated these children as if they were animals, because they were mentally ill. However, that didn’t give them the right to infect healthy children to farther their research. That research should had only been done on the children who already had hepatitis. If I were one of those parents I would have never consented to the research. Krugman and Giles made those parents believe it was the only way their child would get into Willowbrook faster by consenting to the injection. To me that’s like bribery, you do this and we will accept your child here. No research justify involving healthy children without letting a parent know what is going to happen to their child if they consent, and to me Krugman and Giles did not do