preview

Mary C Waters 'Debating Immigration': A Comparative Analysis

Decent Essays

Issues revolving around immigration are dominating the current political debate. In addressing these issues, politicians and other elected officials are forcefully orchestrating the way that immigrants become to know and embrace American culture, thus a crucial part of assimilation. Current practices of assimilation rely on dated research that stresses the importance of jobs, education and language immersion. However, as stated by Mary C Waters, there is a “disconnect between the public debate and findings of scientific research” (11). This disconnect stems from the fact that the practices that once worked for the first generation immigrants are not effective for the new so called second generation. Alejandra Portes and Mihn Zhou in “Should Immigrants Assimilate” and Mary C Waters in “Debating Immigration” address the weaknesses as well as strengths of modern day assimilation in their writings. …show more content…

Portes and Zhou discuss similar subclaims in context that align with Waters, however, Waters attempts to refute such claims with research-based evidence. Although they share a similar scope in regards to the issue of assimilation and its historical context, Waters uses her disciplinary perspective as a researcher to establish an argument grounded in statistical research, rather than observable anecdotes. Both authors develop the importance of maintaining the discussion of second generation immigrants through their warrants, yet Waters refutes the reasons that Portes and Zhou raise to support their

Get Access