Stephenie Igboanugo
Ms. King-Zimmerman
AP Language and Composition
2 October 2016
Quarter 1, Long Form #2
Maus I and II
In the nonfiction novels Maus: A Survivor’s Tale I and II, Art Spiegelman creates a multi-themed book by his use of various connection rhetorical devices. Guilt is one of the most prominent themes of the book. Two types of guilt are present in his books: survivor’s guilt and familial guilt. Spiegelman 's, familial guilt comes from the death of his mother. The guilt that he was the cause of his mother suicide is a haunting thought for Spiegelman. In a comic, he had published in 1974 called “Prisoner on the Hell Planet,” which expresses the traumatic experiences he had to deal with the night of and after his mother 's death. As shown in his comic, on a night in may 1968 his mother asked him “Artie you still love me don 't you,” and he replied, “sure, ma!” (Spiegelman 103). This was the last time he ever saw his mother and he experiences regret and guilt over this conversation. This overall affects the mood and tone of the book because when reading the reader picks up on hints of deep guilt, and this thereby allows the reader to get a look at Spiegelman 's mind. Survivor 's guilt is also vivid in his book(s)
In Maus I his father 's survivor 's guilt is present when he discussed the public hanging of people he knew. His father describes how he felt after he saw them hanging: “I was frightened to go outside for a few days I didn 't want to pass where they
Moral intentions can be explored while contemplating bits of memories. As the narrator reflects upon his past relationship with his father, he starts to acknowledge
The death of a loved one can result in a trauma where the painful experience causes a psychological scar. Alice Sebold’s The Lovely Bones explores the different ways in which people process grief when they lose a loved one. When young Susie Salmon is killed on her way home from school, the remaining four members of her family all deal differently with their grief. After Susie’s death, her mother, Abigail Salmon, endures the adversity of losing her daughter, her family collapsing, and accepting the loss of the life she never had the opportunity to live. Abigail uses Freud’s defence mechanisms to repress wounds, fears, her guilty desires, and to resolve conflicts, which results in her alienation and
Throughout the literary works of The Glass Castle by Jeannette Walls, Maus by Art Spiegelman, and “Mother to Son” by Langston Hughes, different characters deal with adversity differently. In The Glass Castle the characters must overcome family hardships. Likewise, Spiegelman writes about his father’s struggle during the Holocaust. Lastly, in “Mother to Son” the speaker informs her son about her own hardships she had to face. Challenges that characters face can impact them both negatively and positively. Characters from all three literary works deal with adversity by having courage, being resilient, and making poor choices.
“It was only yesterday she had thought with a shudder, that life might be long.” (Chopin 17). “"Poof!"… gave a revealing look at the victims of domestic abuse and how they wrestle with overcoming their fear and their doubts after suffering years of abusive treatment.” (Toomer 5) Loureen unlike Mrs. Mallard, witnesses her husband’s death first hand during a marital argument. Loureen goes through denial questioning whether her husband’s death. She is happy her husband is dead but also feels guilty, because she knows how a mourning wife should react, but the joy of his demise is greater,” I should be praying, I should be thinking of the burial, but all that keeps popping into my mind is what will I wear on television when I share my horrible and wonderful story with a studio audience…”, Loureen’s husband, Samuel, was physically abusive, as revealed by Florence, Loureen’s best friend and neighbor. “Did that mother***** hit you again?” (Nottage 1563) This abuse, physical by Samuel and mental by Brently, is what allows Loureen in the drama “Poof!” and Mrs. Mallard in the short story “The Story of an Hour” to have the shared freedom they feel in the release from their respective abusive relationships.
Wiesel also felt the same because he recounts “My hand shifted on my father’s arm. I had one thought: not to lose him. Not to be left alone” (27). This was the first step to them strengthening their ties to one another and their dependence on each other only grew stronger from this point on. His father shows more concern for Wiesel emotionally than he ever has before. He explains to Wiesel “‘It’s a shame… a shame that you couldn’t have gone with your mother[...]’ [...] His voice was terribly sad. I realized that he did not want to see what they were going to do to me. He did not want to see the burning of his only son. [ …] He was weeping. His body was shaken convulsively” (30-31). The father is only expressing his sorrow for his son, not that he himself will also be burned to death in that situation, or so they thought at the time.
The beginning of any thought provoking essay will hook its audience using a form of pathos. “Two of his sons returned home from the battlefield whole and healthy. The third, however, came home suffering multiple seizures a day”-(Rorabacher). The quote generates sympathy within us making us yearn to see a welcoming outcome and leaving the audience hooked. Eli Hager’s article follows a similar route informing us that “The state of Missouri sent Harris to the penitentiary in Boonvilee, 250 miles from his home and baby daughter”-(Hager). Again we sympathize with the loss of a family, but not all of the articles used grievance to hook us. In the “Quiet Alarm” the audience is informed of a vaudeville performer who performed deadly stunts involving hatchets, pins, and guns on himself to generate shockwaves in the audience. From these examples we identify how our emotions lure us into these texts.
“Maus: A Survivor’s Tale”, and “Maus: And Here My Troubles Began”, are hit graphic novels about World War II, and tell the fictional stories of a soldier who survived the Holocaust. These two books are both purely about survival, but not in the way that you may think. Maus I and Maus II are both essentially telling us that survival may mean that you live through something horrific, but you may be a different person by the end of it.
Life is filled with tragedies, whether they be subtle or monumental. In society we are constantly surrounded by hardships and situations that test our own individual character, forcing us to react in order to move forward. The main characters in “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin, “A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Flannery O’Connor, and “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” by Joyce Carol Oates each react differently to the various tragedies they encounter, revealing their true identities that lie behind the (facade?)/version of themselves they present to the world. These tragedies that factor into all three works are both presented and interpreted differently in each story: In “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin, Mrs. Mallard rejoices
Starting in Maus II, Art suffers from even more depression. It has now been four years since the publication of his first book. Even though his book is successful, Art does not gain any happiness from it, and actually only feels more guilty. Now he feels as if he is exploiting the stories of his father,
Betrayal and loneliness are two of the hardest emotions to encounter in life. Nevertheless, at some point everyone will experience and be forced to deal with them. This is made even harder when they are caused by someone you love and trust. In Meredith Hall’s “Killing Chickens”, she uses various literary devices such as metaphor, simile, and imagery as she processes her husband’s affair and describes having to kill chickens. Hall’s literary nonfiction is based on the happenings of a specific day that was truly hard to handle after being deceived by ones she loved:
Maus: A Survivor's Tale, by Art Spiegelman, tells the story of his father's survival in Auschwitz during the Holocaust, as well as about Art's relationship with his father, brought out through the interview process and writing the two books. The subject matter of the two books is starkly juxtaposed with the style in which it was written, that is, it is a graphic novel. In most simple terms, the story is told in a sort of comic, with characters represented as animals based on their race or nationality (Jews are presented as mice, Germans as cats, Poles as pigs, and Americans as dogs). While the cartoon had once been reserved for rather childish and light subject matter, Spiegelman has brought it to a whole new level as a medium capable
When one cannot deal with guilt within oneself, the feeling of guilt can be transferred to affect another. Art struggles throughout his life to understand why he never had a great relationship with his father. After trying to write with no luck, Art heads to his regular appointment with Pavel, another Holocaust survivor. Pavel suggests that maybe “(Vladek) took his guilt out on YOU, where it was safe… on the REAL survivor.” (7, p 44) Vladek felt guilty about surviving the Holocaust, but instead of accepting it,
The holocaust was a terrible war that killed many Jewish people. Valdek was extremely lucky and he was one of the very few Jews who lived and made it through the war. Although he is still a live he will never be able to forget the terrible things the Nazis did to the Jews. The things he learnt in the concentration camps will always affect his life and after reading Maus the reader can see many different ways that the holocaust effected Valdek’s personality. It made Valdek to become extremely frugal, infuriatingly manipulative, and lastly he isn’t able to relax anymore. We see these three traits a lot throughout the book.
When they had found out that he had lost his fight and was definitely getting the execution penalty Sister Helen thought it was important he was able to have dignity in himself, she knew very well that he had felt sorrow and regret for what was done and she felt that if he was able to make peace with the victims parent’s that he would die knowing he was able to apologize to
Throughout the play, I had moments where I felt sad or upset for a character and what was happening to the character. One scene where I truly had a visceral response was the death of Theogenes. As Pridamant screamed out his son’s name in despair, I thought of my father. Pridamant is overcome by his son’s death. Putting myself in Pridamant’s place, I know I would be very upset to lose my father; but even more so than that, I cannot imagine how my father would feel if he lost his only daughter. The first time I viewed