preview

Medical-Legal Case Study

Decent Essays

The status of this case is that we are awaiting the applicant to undergo an EMG of the upper extremity as recommended by the Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator, Dr. Stephan Choi, in his evaluation report dated December 14, 2016. Please recall, Dr. Choi requested an EMG of the right upper extremity so he can rule out possible carpal tunnel release. He opined if the EMG of the right upper extremity were to come back normal, the applicant would be deemed permanent and stationary.

However, since the applicant’s last evaluation with Dr. Choi, the applicant’s attorney was having a tough time finding the applicant a primary treating physician. We provided our Medical Provider Network link to applicant’s attorney’s office, but they have been delaying in …show more content…

At this time, our office has been corresponding with applicant’s attorney’s office to resolve this issue.

Meanwhile, I believe we do not need to procure an EMG of the upper extremity through the request of the primary treating physician. As you know, this is a medical-legal diagnostic request for the purpose of a medical-legal determination. Therefore, we do not need to go through the utilization review process. In this instance where we are having a tough time finding a primary treating physician for the applicant, I recommend we simply authorize a facility to perform the EMG of the right upper extremity.

Personally, I would recommend Dr. Frank Cantrell, who is a well-known physician in Fresno in the field of neurology. I have seen many EMG/NCV studies from his office. I also confirmed Dr. Cantrell is within our MPN. Therefore, it is my recommendation we send an authorization to Dr. Cantrell for the sole purpose of obtaining an EMG of the right upper extremity as requested by Dr. Choi, so we can move forward with this

Get Access