Meta-Ethical Dilemmas In Court Cases

People from all walks of life face many ethical dilemmas. These dilemmas have consequences. Our worldview determines how we deal with these dilemmas, and guides us to the right decisions. In this essay, I will examine an ethical issues through my Christian worldview. I will also present other viewpoints, and compare them to mine.

Ethical dilemmas occur when there is a disagreement about a situation and all parties involved question how they should behave based on their individual ethical morals. (Newman & Pollnitz, 2005). The dilemma that I will be addressing in this essay involves Michael, recently employed male educator working in the nursery, and parents of a baby enrolled at the centre. The parents have raised concerns about male educators changing their child’s nappy as they have cultural practices that do not allow this practice to take place. This situation is classed as an ethical dilemma as there is a dispute between cultural beliefs and legal requirements within the workplace. There are four parties involved (parents, child, educator and director), all

It was an unethical practice for Calvin Beckett, the district attorney, to threaten Dee Robert’s to accept the plea bargain against her own free will, through informing her that she will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Prosecutors should not be allowed to use their authority power in this manner, because it is a form of extortion. According to Wente (2013), Extortion is defined as is a crime where a person is forced to do something against their own free will, which involve damaging a person’s reputation. In my opinion, the prosecutor begins to extort individuals to accept plea bargaining when the evidence in a case is not strong enough to uphold a conviction. Typically, the prosecutor will overcharge the defendant. Unfortunately,

Milton Manufacturing Company is a closely-held company has been in business since 1999 when its President Irv Milton first opened the business with its primary operations in Long Island City, New York and factory branches and warehouses in surrounding areas. The business had increased revenue over its first ten years of business from $500,000 in its first year to $5 million in 2008.

On 08/22/2017 Adrian and his siblings were returned back home of parent, however Adrian was returned under the condition that his parents find suitable placement for Adrian to live. Since Adrian was ordered home of parent, parents have attempted to place Adrian with different relatives, however his stay is only limited in their homes, as the relatives express that they are unable to look after Adrian because they work full time., and Adrian’s behavior are out of control. Family members fear the consequences of caring for Adrian due to his behaviors, and gang affiliation. Adrian has been residing in different family member’s homes, and most recently his parents Mr. and Mrs. Perez are not able to provide CSW

In this case scenario I would do my job and give them out to the families that have a limited income and cannot afford them. If one sees that they are coming to the expiration date soon then I would believe that it is okay to take them home then, but these samples are for those less fortunate. It is ethically correct to not take the samples home unless they are about to expire and be wasted, but only then. Legally it is not yours to take home it is for the patients.

Per the order received, the court suspended this case effective 1/11/17, with the NCP order to pay $350.00 per month on arrearage owed as of the suspension date.Fiscal reviewed case accounts; case overcharged by six months at the rate of $449.00 per month. . Therefore, the WC account balance was adjusted to $0.00 and the WA account balance was adjusted to $17,215.13. Caseworker A. Brant submitted the fiscal request.

On 08/18/2015, Barbara Feeman contacted Pasco Sheriff`s Office by telephone to report a Petit Theft.

Ethical relativism states “there is no universal right and wrong”, and no matter what decision I will come to, will have consequences to my actions (Kottler & Shepard, 2015). We have several students here at our

MOLLY: One ethical issue in the AZT trials was fairness, the people in the developing countries received a different course of the treatment than those in the developed countries. The African mother-baby patients were put at risk for the gain of American patients.

Since women were not able to borrow money without the consent of their husband or father, Nora faces trouble with the law when she illegally borrows money from her husband’s coworker, Nils Krogstad. Because her husband is a very proud man and would never borrow money in fear of damaging his reputation, Nora could not ask him to sign the loan even if the loan pays for the trip that would save his life. Nora did not want her dying father to worry about it so she broke a law and forged his signature onto the I.O.U. Afterwords she lied to Torvald and said she received the money from her father. She defends her crime by stating,

Looking at ethical issues from the parents’ perspective the way the detectives and police approached them was unethical. The detective and police could have asked questions first to investigate appropriately and calmly the situation. Instead it alarmed and outraged the parents by them telling the parents, “this happened to your child.” Nevertheless, the parents would have wanted to know whether their child was a victim. From the investigation unit, they probably believed they approached the situation appropriately by gathering information to serve justice to the community.

There are two types of theories that we have learned in our first class that apply to the material in the case Queen v. Bradley they are Utilitarianism/Teleological Ethics theory and the Deontological ethics theory. The Teleological ethics theory is when you look at the consequences or the end game of the decision-making process. So basically, you are saying that the ends justify the means. Deontological ethics theory argues that we have certain duties to perform regardless of the consequences.

If you are having any problems with your court, then you will need to contact a professional court refinisher. We can properly fix your court and ensure that all of the rules and regulations are followed. We have been one of the leading court contractors in Southwest Florida for the past 32 years. We build and resurface tennis courts, basketball courts, Bocce courts and racket courts. We offer free estimates on our services. We are your one-stop shop to renovate your recreational facilities. We take a lot of pride in the work that we do and look forward to resurfacing your

“…No matter how plain a women may be if truth and loyalty are stamped upon her face all will be attracted to her...” Anna Eleanor Roosevelt was born on October 11, 2014 in New York City, New York. She was the only the only daughter of Anna Hall and Elliot Roosevelt; she was the middle child in her trio of siblings. Her brothers were Elliot Roosevelt Jr. and Gracie Hall Roosevelt who were the oldest and youngest siblings respectively. The Roosevelt siblings encountered trauma at a young age. Their mother passed away when Eleanor was only eight years old and their father passed away shortly after, when Eleanor just turned