preview

Micromotives And Behavior Book Report

Decent Essays

From economics to biology, equilibria are abundant. In Micromotives and Macrobehavior, Thomas Schelling discusses various types of social equilibria, relating it to age, income, sex, race or language. He gives a plethora of examples that solidify and further convey Schelling’s ideas. According to Schelling, equilibrium is a balanced result that is nether hindering nor helpful. Schelling defines equilibrium as a situation in which several things have been interacting, adjusting to each other and to each other’s adjustment in order to reach a balance. He explains that an equilibrium can never be fully achieved, for a completely equilibrated society is a theoretical reference point rather than a real system. Furthermore, an equilibrium itself is continually changing and never exact (25). These constant fluctuations and unattainable odds aren’t favorable; …show more content…

One example that he gives is that of student ratios at Harvard University. Schelling discusses how men and women distribute themselves between dining halls that contain different ratios of sexes. He explains that if the women were spread equally between each room, the men would naturally create a 50:50 ratio. As men continually arrive, a 40:35 ratio quickly escalates into one overcrowded dining hall and one practically empty hall. This extreme escalation occurs due to the comfort found in equilibria. “The room with more men is always more attractive, even though both become less attractive as men migrate to the more attractive ratio” (38). This example proves the neutrality of equilibrium. A state of equal numbers in each dining hall doesn’t make eating better or worse. The choice that each student made to reach, or in this case destroy, equilibria, was for personal pleasure, not for the benefit of the whole. Through this example, Schelling demonstrates how events naturally fall to an impartial

Get Access