Compare and contrast two established personality assessments discussed in the course. Include in your discussion strengths and limitations of each measure. I will apprise the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-III) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Comparisons: the MCMI-III as well as the MMPI-II offer general profiles of a person's present level of functioning as well as salient features of the individual’s character and personality traits. Additionally, they both offer a series of indices of validity that are designed to provide an assessment of the factors that can distort test results. Such factors may include the failure to appropriately complete test item, carelessness, reading difficulties, confusion, …show more content…
However, the MMPI (original version) and the MMPI-II may not be appropriate for assessing Native American Indians. Researchers have found that these may not be meaningful or valid for describing the individuals of some of these cultures. Some of the items may even conflict with their customs. What is more, some of their scales in some instances can be inadequate or harmful for them, since they can be classify them with psychological …show more content…
For instance, let us say that an assessor is going to evaluate a person who is an immigrant; the immigrants culture background might not be on par with the sample used to develop the tool. Is the assessor’s responsibility to know the tools reliability among this individual background, as well as the psychometric properties of the test. Additionally, if the test has been translated to for the understanding of the examinee, the assessor must know whether the language used has similar meaning across groups. Qualifications for test’s scoring and interpretations: Test users must be aware if any of the tools he/she is using might require a specialized training or educational degree for scoring and/or interpretation of results. For instance, the Carey Temperament Scales although that can be administered by a parent or other caregiver, it should only be scored and interpreted by a licensed or certified professional. Tests assessors must remain within the limits of their professional skills and
The PAI was developed later than the MMPI-2 and is more cost efficient than the MMPI-2. One important difference between the PAI and the MMPI-2 is the test development. The PAI was developed to focus on non-overlapping scales or discriminant validity, where as the MMPI-2 was developed to have scale overlap. Another important difference is the required reading level. The PAI requires a lower reading level (fourth grade) than the MMPI-2 (sixth grade) and is easier to read and comprehend. Lastly, the composition of PAI is different from that of the MMPI-2. The PAI was composed to be shorter in length (344 items) and duration (45-60 minutes) and answered on a four point Likert scale, where as the MMPI-2 was composed to be longer in length (567
Personality is a complex area of Psychology, which has been studied for many years, by many experts in the field. Each having their own ideas about how to understand, study and evaluate it. Here I will introduce personality briefly, looking at the theories behind it. Then explain the need for testing. As there are many test that are available to use, for the purpose of this essay I will look at The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) and discuss the reliability and validity of some studies around these tests.
The two major ethical considerations that are important to address are 9.02 - Use of Assessments and 9.06 - Interpreting Assessment Results. 9.02 - Use of Assessments is particularly important because the psychologist must consider the individual’s language preference and competence. As was noted in the initial case description, Brandon’s parents are both Polish immigrants, and Brandon spoke Polish in home until he attended junior kindergarten. Although he may not have an accent, his language preference should be noted as English may not be the language he is more comfortable using. 9.06 - Interpreting Assessment Results should also be considered. Brandon’s test-taking abilities should be highlighted, as he is suspicious and ambivalent towards the psychological testing. These feelings may negatively affect his test scores, as he may try to either hide how he truly feels, or lie to make himself seem better or worse. It should also be noted that there could be other client characteristics that affect his scores as well, particularly cultural factors.
The MMPI-2 is one of the best psychological tests to use because the validity scales are effective in identifying test-takers who may be faking
Include at least two scholarly sources from the library. MGT 312 WEEK 2 Personality Impact Paper
The client was administered the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- 2nd Edition-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) as an objective measure of their social-emotional and personality functioning. The scores are based on answers to a large number of true/false questions. Based on Mr. Cintron’s responses, this protocol was invalid and uninterpretable due to inconsistent responding. There was evidence of excessive inconsistency because of fixed true responding to the test item.
The assessor wants to note that if Ana was assessed as a child, she would have been administered the MMPI-A. The standard scales of this test contain 9 validity scales, 10 clinical scales, 9 restructured clinical scales, 15 content scales, 15 supplementary scales, and 5 personality psychopathology five scales. It is also important to focus on the 10 clinical scales when assessing the client because this section helps indicate the different psychological or mental conditions. Within the clinical scale you have scales that assess for Hypochondriasis, depression, Hysteria, psychopathic deviate, masculinity/femininity, paranoia, psychasthenia, schizophrenia, hypomania, and social introversion. The hypochondriasis scale is used to assess the neurotic concern over the clients’ bodily functioning. The depression scale is used to assess and identify the clients’ depression described as a dissatisfaction with their own life and a lack of hope. The Hysteria Scale helps to identify individuals who display signs of hysteria when they are in stressful situations. The psychopathic deviate scale is used to identify psychopathic clients, this scale also measures social deviation, lack of disobedience. Next you have Masculinity/Femininity scale
The clarification and management of assessment instruments in counseling have been highlighted in multiple documents. One of the eight common core areas mandated by the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) is assessments. It is emphasized in all counseling related code of ethics including the American Counseling Association (ACA). The ACA states that competence in testing obtained through training, education, and experience as well as master level counselors with course work in assessment are qualified to use objective measures. Verification of a test user’s training, level of education, and credentials are usually required by test publishers. The
The MBTI differs from the more traditional testing and measuring traits, such as intelligence quotient (IQ) testing, in that the MBTI assesses individuals, and then classifies them into specific “types”. Although originally published by the Educational Testing Service, the MBTI protocol is currently controlled and published by the Consulting Psychology Press (CPP). To keep up with changing social standards and norms, CPP continually seeks to improve the MBTI, and as such the assessment is constantly in flux. In years past, there was only one set of official assessment questions. That has changed over time, and at present there are four unique versions of the assessment.
If Amtrak and Metrolink want to use personality tests on their employees, the MMPI would be most effective. The positives of this test far outweigh the cons. The test examines everything about a person, from their self-esteem to emotions. It can also identify any signs of disorder in an individual. It is also widely used by many different companies to assess the success a person might have in a high-risk public safety position. The MMPI is widely considered to be the most reliable personality test. It dives much deeper into a person's psyche than any of its counterparts, like the Rorschach Test. The only downside to the MMPI is the amount of time it takes to complete. With 567 true-false questions, it can take a while to complete, but the information
The validity of a test if very important, because it can make or break a test. The purpose of a test is to measure something specific. If the test has low validity it is not measuring what it supposed to measure. The Holland codes validity is measured through the different personality types. The test has shown to accurately predict a possible career choice for each participants (O’Connell 1971).
In this next section, the three selected tests will be reviewed for their "appropriateness of test content, skills tested, and content coverage for the intended purpose of testing," (Code, 2004, p. 5, See #2). ASEBA 's behavior checklist and self-reports contains DSM-Oriented, syndrome, competence, and adaptive functioning scales that target specific behavior, thought, emotions, and social interactions, (Lacalle et al, 2012). As a result, this test can provide appropriate behavioral treatment plans. When Lacelle, Ezpeleta, and Doménech evaluated this test,
When it comes to objective tests, it is implied that they are accurate, precise, and resistant to biased influences. Scoring errors are another potential concern. In reviewing the projective test, it is determined by Meyer and Kurtz (2006) that one‘s personality will not shine through with force and clarity regardless of the medium, the presence of the client’s responses confuses the efforts to interpret the test scores, and that is what the psychologists are most interested in interpreting (Meyer & Kurtz, 2006)
A level S qualification requires that buyers have a degree, certificate, or license to practice in a health care profession, in addition to having the appropriate training and experience in ethical administration, scoring, and interpretation of clinical behavioral assessment measures (NEO PI-R™, 2012). A level B qualification is very similar to the level S qualification in that it requires a degree from an accredited 4-year college or university in psychology, counseling, or a related field, in addition to satisfactory completion of coursework in test interpretation, psychometrics and measurement theory, educational statistics; or a license or certification from an agency that requires appropriate training and experience in the ethical and competent use of psychological tests (NEO PI-R™, 2012). This helps to ensure that the test is only handled by individuals who have the necessary knowledge to interpret the test without misinterpretation, which could have negative outcomes. The NEO PI-R is self-administered, which means individuals who do not have formal training in clinical psychology, personality or related fields can administer and score the instruments. Although, it is highly suggested that the examiner review the administration and scoring procedures from the manual. On the other hand, interpretation of the results should only be done by professionals with training in psychological testing and measurement with knowledge of the
The NEO PI-R is available for purchase at the publisher’s website, for individuals with a qualification level of S or B. A level S qualification requires that buyers have a degree, certificate, or license to practice in a health care profession, in addition to having the appropriate training and experience in ethical administration, scoring, and interpretation of clinical behavioral assessment measures (NEO PI-R™, 2012). A level B qualification is very similar to the level S qualification in that it requires a license or certification that required appropriate training and experience in the ethical and knowledgeable use of psychological tests, or a degree in psychology, counseling, or a related field, in addition to having completed coursework in test interpretation, psychometrics, measurement theory, and educational statistics with a passing grade (NEO PI-R™, 2012). This helps to ensure that the test is only handled by individuals who have the necessary knowledge to interpret the test without misinterpretation, which could have negative outcomes.