preview

Moral Ambiguity In Sir Gawain And The Green Knight

Decent Essays

Moral ambiguity—and the idea of morally ambiguous people—results from dilemmas whose ethical choice is unclear. One may be considered evil for making a decision that contradicts the principles or systems of ethicality that some may have, while on the other hand they may be treated as perfectly good because of a conflicting perspective or ethical system which believes otherwise. Sir Gawain, from the Pearl Poet’s Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, is a suitable example of a morally ambiguous character whose decisions may be considered pure by some and wicked by others. Gawain’s first choice to chop off Bertilak’s head—instead of being honourable by only giving him a nick and trusting that he would in favour return the same—can be thought of as an act which runs contrary to chivalry. His later decision to accept and keep the girdle is another example of his unchivalrous behaviour by not trusting in God to save him and by keeping the girdle (essentially stealing it) from his host, Bertilak. On the contrary, Gawain can be thought of as a force of good for accepting Bertilak’s challenge in the place of Arthur and agreeing to the terms which he fulfills later in the book. His decision to decapitate the Green Knight can be seen as an attempt to rid society of a form of evil which threatens it and can, therefore, be considered a commendable act. The Pearl Poet uses the morally ambiguous character, Gawain, to show that people who may seem good in one way may be seen as evil in another.

Get Access