When asked his motivation for committing the Great Train Robbery, Edward Pierce replied with, “‘I wanted the money’” (Crichton 264). On a literal level, Pierce’s hunger for money may seem like the only motive, but on a deeper level, it is discovered that the crime is caused by Pierce’s inflated self-image and narcissistic personality. In The Great Train Robbery by Michael Crichton, Pierce’s greed and pride motivate him to steal the gold because he thinks he is special. Since Pierce is narcissistic, he believes that he is able to accomplish the impossible. Pierce knows that he will be famed as “notorious” (4) and that the train robbery will be viewed as “startling and titillating” (5) for a man of his stature. Later, Pierce even admits …show more content…
When trying to enlist Richard Burgess’s help, Pierce starts by asking him many questions about his family and his job, but “Pierce was not asking these questions to obtain information [because] he already knew a good deal about Richard Burgess” (129). Pierce was merely trying to manipulate Burgess into thinking that he was all-knowing. As the novel progresses, Pierce acts more audaciously because he is empowered by his success in planning. When Robert Agar inquires as to whether or not Pierce has the skill to climb from train car to train car, Pierce replies that he has climbed with A. E. Coolidge, a famous mountaineer (189). However, in his testimony, Pierce admits that he had had no previous experience with mountaineering and he “‘merely said that to reassure Agar’” (212). Furthermore, Pierce acts arrogantly at his trial even when he discovers that his confidence was unfounded (213). To conclude, Pierce acts prideful and righteous until the end of his trial even when he has been caught. Moreover, Pierce escapes with the gold and his inflated sense of self. Even though he didn’t need the money, Pierce wanted the money, and his greed combined with his narcissism gave him the motivation to commit the Great Train
When Detective Al Dewey opened his eyes, he saw Smith’s “same childish feet, tilted, dangling,” that he saw in the interrogation room at Police Headquarters in Las Vegas years earlier (Capote 341). By portraying Perry as “childish,” trustworthiness, loyalty, innocence, and naivety, are all traits that the audience therefore may associate with him. Truman Capote’s use of the word “dangling” also signifies his helplessness during the execution. Because Perry is portrayed as childlike and helpless, one finds it hard to believe that he murdered four innocent
Jack the Ripper was one of the most famous and renowned killers in history. Even though he was not the first serial killer, he was the first killer to strike on a metropolis setting. Jack the Ripper was in his prime at a time when the media had a strong control over society and society as a whole was becoming much more literate. Jack started his killing campaign at a time of political controversy between the liberals and social reformers along with the Irish Home rule partisans. The reports of Jack the Ripper were collected and reported by the police, but then the different newspapers with their political influences slightly distorted the stories to give them their own effect. It has been more the one hundred years since the last murder
Thesis Statement: A research paper of the mysterious and famous 19th century serial killer Jack the Ripper and how it is that the legend came to be.
2016: Many works of literature contain a character who intentionally deceives others. The character’s dishonesty may be intended either to help or to hurt. Such a character, for example, may choose to mislead others for personal safety, to spare someone’s feelings, or to carry out a crime. Choose a novel or play in which a character deceives others. Then, in a well-written essay, analyze the motives for that character’s deception and discuss how the deception contributes to the meaning of the work as a whole.
Perry Smith and Dick Hickock were two very different men who came together in one the most renowned and talked about murders in American history. Although the men’s motives were the same, the psychological differences that they experienced after the murders were very different. Smith and Hickock were living testaments to the fact that one’s upbringing really does play a part into the person one will someday become. For Perry, his traumatic family experiences, or lack of them, led him to a psychotic malfunction and for
Although Perry can sometimes seem as a person who does not care about others opinions, his need for approval can be seen through how he got his relationship with Dick and the impression he leaves him with. While discussing the story of Perry beating up a colored man to death for no apparent reason, the author states, “It was a significant question, for his original interest in Perry, his assessment of Perry’s character and potentialities, was founded on the story Perry had once told him of how he had beaten a colored man to death”(109). By “his original interest in Perry”, the author is discussing Dick’s reason for getting close to Perry. Dick‘s sole reason for becoming Perry’s friend was because of the story he was told by Perry, which is
The crime is defined as the law-breaking cruel action committed by the criminals. These criminals usually have some deep trauma deep in their heart and the sudden bursting of all the negative sentiments will result in very devastating consequences of hurting other human beings. This essay will mainly compare Perry Smith in In Cold Blood and Misfit in A Good Man is hard to find, which is both the main character and the main criminal in the two crime stories. They have a lot of things in common as a criminal with minor differences. They a are both cynical to the society; They have both found themselves isolated from the society.
After speaking with Mr. and Mrs. James, they informed us that they strongly believe their son has been murdered. We have begun to think that George was murdered by an unknown person, but with no remains
The protagonist holds to his immature beliefs that by looking, acting and maintaining a false façade as a “dangerous character” (Boyle,114) it would bestow on him an the badness he desires.
“The third stage of narrative development was characterized by the appearance of rogues… relying on cleverness more than force, and motivated more by profits than by passion” (Williams 14). Rogues defied whatever came in between their pursuit, whether it be law or authority (Williams 14). In the third stage of criminal literature, the protagonists were all rogues despite of their unlawfully ways, they “aroused reader sympathy” (Williams 16). Williams described these rogues as “outsiders, existing apart from the social structure either by choice or by fate” (William 16). He also described these rogues as “individualistic, opportunistic, self-reliant” as well as “defiant of authority and entirely free” (Williams 16). William argues that the evolution of these narratives took place in three stages: the first being the “early execution sermons and final confessions”, the second being “the incomplete narratives of life and, finally the full length rogue narrative” (Williams 17). Williams’ article describes how criminal literature changed from “promoting obedience, [to] encouraged defiance” (Williams
Understanding and analyzing past serial killers motives is a vital part in stopping future killing sprees. H.H. Holmes and Dr. Harold Shipman, both considered as two of the most prolific serial killers, share many common behaviors that are necessary to be investigated. From childhood through adulthood, Holmes and Shipman are very similar when it comes to experiences, traits, motives, etc. Erik Larson, in The Devil In The White City, develops H.H. Holmes character through describing his unique attributes, which gives an inside look on why Holmes was motivated to kill so many people. Knowing H.H. Holmes motives is crucial in order to stop future serial killers from evading the police for so long like Dr. Harold Shipman.
A Streetcar Named Desire is a socially challenging play in light of the way in which Tennessee Williams depicts the capacity of human nature for brutality and deceit. He takes the viewpoint that, no matter how structured or 'civilized' society is, all people will rely on their natural animal instincts, such as dominance and deception, to get themselves out of trouble at some stage in life. William's has created three main characters, Blanche Dubois, Stella Kowalski and Stanley Kowalski. Each of these characters is equally as civilized as the next, yet all are guilty of acts of savagery on different levels. Throughout the play Williams symbolically relates these three characters to animals, 'savages,' through the disclosure of
Motivations are the fuel of our lives, we are motivated to do just about anything. Motivations both positive and negative are valid. Tennessee William’s “A Streetcar Named Desire” we are introduced to a very unique roster of characters, These characters are all very different and unique, throughout the play we see the struggle between the characters, and how they interact and conflict with one another. Stanley Kowalski, Blanche Dubois and Harold Mitchell are all very different yet very similar. Tennessee Williams develops the idea that, when one is motivated by the past, their actions may not be appropriate for their present environment.
As I watched the brittle paper fall like a feather to the ground, the crisp face of Alexander Hamilton lured me into what I thought would be a quick snatch. Stealing was not particularly a trait for which I was known. On the contrary, I was known for my keen sense of responsibility and intelligence. These traits were essential to my everyday life but were not present one adventurous evening in August. At that moment in time, I had no qualms with committing a criminal act, but little did I know that a tiny green slip would alter my life choices for years to come.
“The first leg of the fraud triangle represents pressure. This is what motivates the crime in the first place. The individual