For the period of one month, I observed a 40-year-old man going about his normal routine. This person, characterized as “M” herein, is a South American of limited schooling. He did attend college but, in shifting courses prompted by loss of concentration, attained no degree. M is married, although there is no appreciable degree of intimacy with his spouse. He is a veteran of the armed services, but he was released for medical reasons after a few years and, despite a lack of medical evidence, claims that he still suffers from injuries sustained during his service. While M seeks to assert a middle-class level of comfort, his income is insignificant and poverty is more accurately his financial state. Lastly, and as will be further explored through reference to other aspects of his life, much of M's conduct, as well as the few pursuits in which he engages, reflects an absence of any ambition whatsoever and an extreme disinclination to become involved, even casually, with others. In virtually every arena by which general human conduct is assessed, M leads a distinctly antisocial life, and one moreover evidently unfriendly to those in contact with him. The intent here is to compare M with a relatively normal man of a similar age, and something of a disclaimer is consequently called for. Defining …show more content…
Regrettably, this distinction arises from nothing commendable, or even remotely average. While the intent here has not been to attach moral judgments to the man's behaviors, the greater reality is that a simple comparison between M and an average man cannot help but illustrate severe and chronic deficiencies in the character of the former. A human's behavior essentially reveals the intrinsic worth of that human, as it reflects his ideas about life and humanity in general. In the case of M, and entirely opposed to the average man, the character is consistently self-destructive, unpleasant, and
Human nature is the characteristics, feelings and behavioral traits of humankind. Humans are capable of expressing different kinds of emotions such as joy, frustration, despair, remorse, and other forms of emotions depending on the situations they are encountering. In the film ‘Minority Report’, various kinds of human characteristics have been portrayed. The view of human nature posited in this film is assuming that all humankind is likely to commit crimes regardless of their position.
What is the quality of man, what is considered as a typical of a man?
A prime poster boy for narcissistic personality disorder subject H was a middle aged Iranian man in the midst of drug rehabilitation. It is common for people with NPD to become dependent on substances due to their necessity to cope with inadequacy.(Donaldson-Pressman, The Narcissistic Family 1994) Like many people with NPD he was very handsome and held a demanding presence.(DSM) H’s symptoms were first noticed by his therapist during a group talk session. H was noted to recount stories of vicious spousal abuse (throwing his ex-wife out of a moving car in rage) and robberies he committed against family members at gunpoint, with a sense of pride and content. H’s therapist decided to see how he interacted with his parents in order to develop a better diagnosis. His therapist Stras describes the session:
Everyday an individual encounters an act of cruelty, whether it is physically, emotionally, or verbally. On the other hand, there are those who inflict harm intentionally or unintentionally on others as a result of being dissatisfied emotionally or psychologically. Such individuals become labeled either to be good or bad by society. However, a person as a whole cannot be good or bad; it is their actions that are vile. Similarly, in “The Possibility of Evil” by Shirley Jackson, Miss Strangeworth reveals her cruelty through writing letters while, in “The Snake” by Ervin D Krause, the uncle shows his cruelty through his behaviour towards the boy. Thus, all individuals expose their cruelty through their immoral actions.
On a study of this controversy of nature versus nurture, Ulysses Handy was observed. He was a normal child raised in a religious home with his single mother. He was active in boy scouts and was an honor student. Although he had a great childhood, Handy felt extremely lonely and misunderstood. He feels as though the pain he felt couldn’t compare to others, so he resulted in killing people so they could get a taste of what he feels like on a daily basis (Wallace 1). Feeling lonely as a child can lead to many problems in adulthood, and leans towards the side of nurture. Handy’s family was normal and so was he, until he started feeling lonely, which grew into his rage to hurt others so they could feel his pain. He was nurtured into becoming evil by the lack of parental attentiveness. The feelings of children can explain their actions, and when not treated right away can develop into deeper problems that cannot be fixed. Children who are nurtured evil have
Draft thesis statement: Through numerous examples as illustrated in Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience”, along with the “Replicating Milgrim” experiment by Burger, individuals that have comprised an entirely different set of moral in order to obey, should not be excused for all accountability, even when responsibility is presumably accepted by someone with authority, as there is a lack of correlation between the impact of self awareness in morality to the pressure for obedience.
In extreme situations, a person can easily lose their sense of self and alter their perception of morality. A good example of this is the Stanford Prison experiment in which a psychologist, Philip G. Zimbardo, simulated a prison to test if conformity among prisoners and guards would affect the level of violence. Zimbardo assigned half of a group of healthy Stanford students the role of guard and the other half prisoners, and what quickly followed in the simulation was disastrous in nature. Another renowned psychologist, Carol Gilligan, has written in depth about morality, especially in regards to femininity and caring. She disagrees with Kohlberg’s former theory of morality, it focused on males and resulted in females getting lower ratings on his moral development scale. Gilligan presents a theory that includes the feminine view and argues that women have a view of morality based on caring and relationships, whereas the masculine morality centers on law and order. It is intriguing to examine the Stanford Prison Experiment and Gilligan’s theories together, evidence in support of Gilligan’s theory surfaces while a gray area is present in the separation of strictly male and female moralities. The Stanford Prison Experiment presents some compelling evidence for Gilligan’s stages of development, but the theory falls short to address the complexity of human behavior.
In this article psychiatrist therapist Anthony Daniel relates his 14 years in a jail doctor's facility. Daniel expresses that man is intrinsically malevolent, and whatever is left of society is most certainly not. With each underhanded flare-up new shades of malice are met while the more established ones are freed off. Man will act ordinarily until another wickedness is raised and gets on. The more a man does well and is noted as being great, the less shrewd they are.
A man came into my office in the Salinas Country Psychiatric Clinic today, and I assigned his case number 2468. On my clinical report I will be using my colleague John Steinbeck’s research novel, Of Mice and Men, sciencedaily.com article Pain of ostracism can be deep, long-lasting, and the article Recovery from ostracism from ostracism-awareness.com. My client’s name is Crooks James, and he is a 30 year old man working as a stable buck in a ranch. He has never been married and the farthest level of education he has completed is high school. He was born in Soledad, California and grew up there for nearly his entire life. Growing up, he had two brothers and a father who owned a chicken ranch. His mother died when he was 8 years old. When
Good people can cause severe harm if their motives are influenced by the values shared in a public corporation or are a result of manipulation controlled by the law. Bob Henderson’s ability to satisfy his interests to obtain success by dismissing social responsibility and contributing to the rise in obesity is wrong. Hannah Arendt founded the theory “The banality evil’ through analyzing Adolf Eichmann’s case during the time of the Holocaust. Eichmann and Henderson share similarities of both being ordinary men who influenced large scale harm. The intent of this essay will be to compare and contrast the perception of evil and discuss at which point radical evil may be mistaken for banal evil.
tter if they are minor, moderate, or severe individuals all around the world face problems. With this in mind, characters in the stories Hamlet by William Shakespeare, The Lottery Ticket by Anton Pavlovich Chekov, and Lamb to the Slaughter by Roald Dahl face different circumstances which lead them to the action of being the described word “bad”. Therefore, humanity is not born “bad”, circumstance forces individuals to bad behavior.
Here, Alex explains that goodness and badness in a human being is a natural trait and every human being needs free will to act according to their inborn trait. Nevertheless, such unbiased perception of free will becomes a problem when it is associated within the larger human society. Alex’s behaviour is a clear violation of the “harm principle” described by John Stuart Mill, which means that humans can engage in any action that does not harm anyone.
In search for the perfect man, could it be we tend to find the average man? Throughout history there has been many philosophers such as Adolphe Quetelet, Johann Herder, and Alexis Tocqueville, all of which worked on theories and done research on “man” in society. Although their work has had differences, there has been similarities that connect all three of these philosophers’ ideas together. As a brief background, Herder expressed the history of man throughout his work. This history of man portrayed survival tactics, emotional responses, human nature, and the consequences faced by man. Tocqueville’s work consists of the Democracy in America and the ultimate goal of an “Indefinite Perfectibility of Man,” the idea of equality among all,
Throughout history, there have been many human beings whom have been seen as either a hero or a villain. In their childhood, these people must had obstacles that were in their way, causing each individual to either work harder or give up. People, however; must understand that each individual has a potential in achieving their goals, but if one is mistreated or deceived due to jealousy, resentment, hatred, or ambition, it can lead to many catastrophic events. People who have pride and arrogance do not want to have equals, rather they want to see their victims suffer. These people have no difficulty in achieving their goals due to the fact that their victims have too innocent a nature to suspect the nefarious motives of their enemies. In
From the moment they are born, humans have a naturally evil predisposition. Although the term ‘evil’ is difficult to define, there are various views on morality. The most commonly referenced one, Moral Objectivism, holds that moral standards are universally transcendent, and that certain acts are right or wrong independent of human subjectivity. It is by this unspoken moral code that humanity’s acts are judged. There is some debate whether a fundamental human nature exists, as social and environmental influences are present from the moment someone is born. But if we can define human nature, it is beyond doubt, naturally evil. The English philosopher Thomas