Nature Vs. Nurture: A Narrative Fiction

Nature or Nurture. Nature may be all of the genes and hereditary factors with which influence them to become who they are such as physical appearances and personality characteristics. Nurturing impacts people’s lives as well as how they are raised and all the environmental factors. In combination, these qualities can be the true identity of oneself. Many people may argue that nurture appears to a play huge factor in the two, but others may think otherwise. Not having both as a characteristic can have a negative effect on a person physically and mentally. The debate of nature versus nurture appears to be the oldest argument known to man, and it still remains to be unanswered. In the old-age argument nature versus nurture, nature may play a huge role in determining a person’s true identity.

aggressively because the odds are stacked against them, with less ability to control their aggressive behavior when presented with a reward or no reward situation. Unbalanced levels of serotonin and norepinephrine, like dopamine, can affect one's ability to deal with stressors, which includes the likelihood of committing a crime. Similarly, certain genes are expressed differently because of environmental factors that predispose one to environmental risk when the two come into contact.

Why do people act a certain way? Some people are aggressive and others aren’t. Nature and nurture play a role in this. Is it because of the genes passed down from their parents or is it because of the environment where they live in? The reason I picked this topic is because in some areas of my life and other people’s lives, environmental aspects plays a role which affects their behavior and actions, but genes play a role too. I am curious about the topic and why scientists have not found an answer to whether it is nature or nurture. How can a topic have evidence explaining why it is both environmentally and genes. Why isn’t there one answer? Do the aspects intelligence, aggressive behaviors and Mental disorders contribute to the environment where people live in and their genes pasted down?

For those parent who have children with severe and multiple disabilities, planning for the future is a critical, lifelong process and requires considerable investments of time and effort, while potentially causing significant stress to the parents. These families need support services that teach family cohesiveness, perceived control, education on coping skills, and a stress management programs can and will help increase resilience for both families and the child with the physical disorders (Argosy online). Jefferson’s case on traumatic brain injury is one of the many cases where the parents have to work hard being on the same page to ensuring that their son receives proper care and an education which will enable him to be as independent as possible through the use of both technology and working with therapist. This paper will cover nature versus nurture on Jefferson’s condition, his prognosis and how Jefferson would have been if raised 40 years ago.

From Dr. Money’s perspective, raising Bruce as a girl would allow him to live a “normal” life, if he were to live his life without a penis, he would be seen as an outsider and rejected from society. He also suggested to put Bruce on estrogen, but also surgically give him a cosmetic vagina. Dr. Money explained to Ron and Janet that Bruce/Brenda, would psychologically mature as a woman, and be attracted to men, as well as be able to have sexual intecourse, without a problem. According to Bruce’s parents, there was no reason “that it shouldn’t work” (50). However, they could have thought it out thoroughly, what if Brenda didn’t feel comfortable in her own skin? Would she feel as though something is wrong with her? This is where the topic of

The Dependent Gene: The Fallacy of “Nature vs. Nurture” by David S. Moore (Summary) In the beginning of the book, Moore wrote how kids are experiencing with genes and knowing the meaning of. His example was that a 6-year-old is taller than an 8-year-old. Then the 8-year-old explains that he’s going to be short because his parents are shorts and it’s in his genes. Moore mentions that it is influenced that children are nurtured.

Is nature responsible for the way children think and behave, or is it due to the way a child is nurtured? Scientists and psychologists have been debating the subject of nature versus nurture for decades. The term “nature” refers to heredity, or the genetic traits passed down from parent to child (Powell, 2010). Researchers all over the world attempt to prove that genetics is the sole explanation of a child’s intelligence and personality. Human DNA determines traits such as eye color, nose shape, and hair color. While a child’s DNA can determine his or her risk of Down Syndrome, heart disease, or cancer; there is not significant proof of DNA determining personality traits (Heredity, 2011). The nurture side of the argument refers to a

“What did you do, babe?” I turn to Alessandra while trying to hold back the urge to pull my damn hair out.

This report is based upon the book Nurture the Nature: Understanding and Supporting Your Child’s Unique Core Personality, written by Michael Gurian. This book is published by Jossey-Bass an imprint of John Wiley & Sons Publishers and is copyrighted 2007 by Michael Gurian. This book is filled with 370 pages of information on child development and issues parents and children face throughout the process.

In society, not one person is alike. By saying this, many people believe that they strongly take after their parents. Meaning they think Nature is a big part in their life and why they are who they are. The genes in each cell in us humans determine the different traits that we have, more dominantly on the physical connections like eye color, hair color, ear size, height, and other traits. However, it is still not known whether the more abstract attributes like personality, intelligence, sexual orientation, likes and dislikes are gene-coded in our DNA. The nurture theory has experiments showing a child’s behavior with the environment as to adult behavior. In the Nature Vs Nurture debate, everyone has their own thoughts and ideas on each

Scientists and psychologists everywhere study twins. The argument most commonly studied is nature versus nurture. The focus of this essay, however, is whether or not to separate twins in schools. Some believe the separation is demeaning and traumatic to the twins. The side about to be proved however that is this separation is a necessary step in the individualization of twins. Often, separation sparks the path to individualization.

The ongoing debate of the topic “Nurture” is more important than “nature”, has been considered true many times throughout the world from books to real life scenarios and events, but what is our meaning of “nurture” and “nature”? The common aspect of “nurture” is where outside influences determine what we will be like society being an example, while “nature” is basically that genetics determine the outcome of how people turn out. There is an easy argument for the case of “nurture”, but just because of the argument being an easy case, is it really true? People acquire their personalities, opinions and beliefs through “nurture”, while they also inherit a much deeper meaning of quality through “nature”, being that, quality is the trait which it takes to commit murder, seek risk, or become an accountant. That is why the statement “nurture” is more important than “nature”is false.

The controversial debate of nature versus nurture has been around since 1869. The phrase “Nature Versus Nurture” was created by the English polymath, Francis Galton. Galton was influenced by a book written by his cousin, Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species. Darwin’s book introduces the scientific theory of how populations evolve through the process of natural selection. Galton was the first to apply statistical methods to the study of human intelligence inheritance. This allowed him to determine what percentage of a person’s knowledge came from their genetics. Galton’s studies still continue to be used to this day.

“Cut from the same cloth”, “The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree”, “A chip off the old block”; most of us have heard these types of idioms at one point or another, ways of likening us to our parents. Sometimes they are right, while other times it couldn’t be farther from the truth; leaving us to wonder, “what is it that makes us who we are?” Are we simply the product of our environments, a collective sum of our interactions and experiences? Or, do our genetics pre-determine who we are, complex variations in our DNA that dictate our individual personalities? Some scientists argue on behalf of the nurture theory, that our personalities are continually changing and growing, influenced by the world and people around us. Others believe that we are pre-wired by genetics alone, that while external factors may magnify or diminish some aspects of that wiring, everything we are is already programmed into us from the moment of conception. So, who is right?

“Well let’s start on what happened after you left town, ya know, from 20 years ago,” Tristan said, chuckling.