“People will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel” (Maya Angelou, 1969). Arguably, human development is one of the most important topics to understand in life. In studying the different parts of human development each week, I was able to better understand how and why humans interact with each other, the world, and oneself. Of the topics covered in this course, two discussions that really stood out were the nature versus nurture discussion in chapter 1 and the development of memory to the gradual loss of memory in chapter 8. Moreover, the nature versus nurture debate really stood out to me as a public health student and as a sister to a homosexual brother. Although it …show more content…
Individuals in a certain family maybe “nurtured” into believing that heterosexual orientation is the only route of orientation, but may claim that they choose a different path because they were “born that way”, implying that it was genetic. This concept can also be applied with numerous incidences across races, religion, social afflictions, and many other things. This makes the arguments of the nature versus nurture issue a very complex one in that it is very conditional. Sigelman and Rider conclude in their argument, “that it is not nature or nurture; it is nature and nurture”(Sigel & Rider, 2012, p. 8). I believe this point is important when trying to understand my brother and other people in the future as a public health …show more content…
244). Sigelman and Rider then go on to explain how from the start working memory develops as early as the first few weeks of life and continues to childhood & adolescence. (Sigelman and Rider, 2012, p. 250) Then memory is said to reach its peak at young adulthood and fall into decline as older ages are reached. This topic has special interest to me in that my grandmother died last year from the complications of dementia and my parents sometimes have trouble remembering things. I’m not worried that my parents will have the same fate, but it comforts me to understand the different types of memory capacities during life, and why that potentially happened to my grandmother. This section helped me to better understand working memory and techniques my parents and I can use to keep our memory “strong” for the
For centuries, human’s behavior has been the center of attention not just for scientists, but also psychologist, scientist, and physiologies have always questioned what the root or main factor that contributes to a person's personality, sexuality; in other words, their entire behavior. Nature v.s. nurture has been one of the biggest debates that the scientific world has faced. Nature states that genes are responsible for human behavior, sexuality, and predisposition to certain diseases. On the other hand, nurture is defined as the theory that says all the contrary compared to nature. According to the nurture theory, the environment is the main factor that contributes to someone’s behavior, sexuality, and predisposition to diseases. This debate goes back to the era of the great philosopher Plato (428-348 B.C.E); who stated that temperament and intelligence are innate. Also, this debate has caused disagreement in two of the major psychologists known to mankind, Lev Vygotsky and Jean Piaget. The disagreement originated when Vygotsky stated that the cognitive development of a child is mainly influenced by
Nature vs Nurture debate is the representation that society is an organism, but the question is do we inherently possess the knowledge to function as an organism, or are we taught this skill. The debate over Nature vs Nurture is more of a struggle about which theory is the correct theory in my opinion. Social behaviors can be the product of both genetics as well as an influence by our environment.
4. How would an advocate of the nurture theory explain homosexual behavior in men and women?
One of the oldest debates in psychology is nature versus nurture. Nature is the inborn, innate character of an organism. (Spencer A. Rathus pg. 56) Nurture is the sum total of the environmental factors that affect an organism from conception onward. (Spencer A. Rathus pg. 56) Basically nature is what you have from heredity and nurture is you environmental influences.
Throughout history, studies have shown that who you become later in life is determined at birth, that one’s genes solely influence who they grow up to be. To some extend this may be true however, new research concluded that the environment and experiences someone experiences as a child can be just as influential as genetic makeup. These studies have led to the Nature verses Nurture debate, with the nature side being one’s heredities and the nurture side, childhood experiences and relationships. This controversy has largely impacted the criminal world, as law enforcement tries to understand why some people commit horrendous acts. Nature vs. Nurture specifically comes into play when trying to understand the psychology of a serial killer, as
The Nature versus Nurture debate has been ongoing for centuries. People have tried to gain power through knowledge in determining what causes the human “mind to tick.” For centuries leaders and scientists have performed unethical and immoral studies to determine why two people with similar genetic composition can come from similar backgrounds and turn out so differently. I have witnessed a person raised in a poor home by parents with drug addictions become a thriving contributable member of society. Unfortunately, I have also witnessed a person raised in a Christian home with a Father as a minister who ended up in prison. As we learn about the psychological and biological composition of human beings and the affecting environment, I am
In the nature versus nurture debate, homosexual’s environment and experiences shaped them more than genetics. For example, being raised in a gay home will heavily influence someone’s orientation unconsciously. Also, if an individual ties abuse and trauma from the opposite sex this fear might trigger them to feel more comfortable or attracted to the same sex. In addition, a person’s curiosity to experiment with their sexual preferences also can alter what they initially once were attracted to. A person’s experience is a vital role of how one’s sexuality is developed.
Have you ever heard the phrase nature vs nurture, well If you haven't you're about to. The nature vs nurture debate is a very complex debate that has been around for along time, scientist have also done many studies to find out which is has more effect on a person. Nature is what makes you who you are and is part of you from when you are born and when you die. Nurture is how a person is raised and what a person learns from experiences, this can always change.
Homosexuality is at the front lines of the nature versus nurture debate. Many studies have been conducted, but a clear cause has yet to be found. Anti-homosexuals, consisting mainly of religious groups, believe that homosexuality is abnormal, unnatural, and can be changed. Because of their beliefs, homosexuality must be a learned behavior. Whether homosexuality is biological or learned behavior is still a mystery, but scientists are finding more evidence to suggest the former.
One of the oldest, most prominent topics of academic debate is the Nature vs. Nurture argument. Nature vs. Nurture is a largely psychological term, in which the Nature aspect places more significance on genetics and personality; our innate predisposition to various circumstances tell us a great deal more about who we are. On the other side, the Nurture aspect places more focus on our environment and stresses the salience of the majority of what we do in our daily lives have been “learned” We see a wide array of examples of this specific argument in literature, popular culture, and even in our everyday lives. While no one can deny that both sides have extremely valid points, it would be very naive to assume that one had more of a dominant factor;
Whether people were born with a certain trait or them naturally having the ability to adapt to a certain condition , due to the environment they are living in. In these two articles the authors wrote the article with different points of view , often debating whether someone’s environment has to do with their own success and the way they end up in the future . If they are successful or if they end up in “bad” places due to the choices they make. In the article “The Science of Success” , in paragraph 3 its states “ With a bad environment and poor parenting , orchid children can end up depressed , drug addicted, or in jail - but with the right environment and good parenting they can grow up to be society's most creative, successful, and happy people “.
According to the article, What is Nature vs. Nurture?, nature is referred as “to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are—from our physical appearance to our personality characteristics” (Cherry, paragraph 1). For the nature side of the argument, mental disorders can be passed from generations. According to the article, Is Mental Illness Genetic? The Mental Disorders You’re Most Likely To Inherit, 40% of all sufferers, seems to identify at least one close family member with the same type of disorder. For example, my grandmother who was born in 1918, suffered over 40 years of severe depression to the point she had to take clonazepam pills to help with her sleeping and her depression. I was born in 1997, and I suffer
Nurture refers to all the environmental factors that influence what kind of people we are. These include our experiences growing up as a child, our relationships with others around us, and the culture that they are accustomed to. Nick Collins's online article, Nature vs. Nurture: Outcome Depends on Where You Live, argued that your environment impacted the person you are and the personalities you develop. “In London, environment played a greater role than genetics- possibly because wealth varies so dramatically within communities, meaning twins growing up on the same street are more likely to fall in with different groups of friends who could influence their behavior” (Collins). Although a pair of twins can be relatively similar when it comes
Society has isolated genetics and the environment into two separate components. When in reality nature and nurture coincide. Both genetic and environmental components influence an individual and contribute to their molding. In my perspective nature verses nurture should not be considered a valid debate. There are too many variables that contribute to an individual’s identity to suggest that genetics or environmental surroundings are the primary force that shapes an individual.
The nature-nurture debate has been around for decades. It is one of the oldest and most popular topics in the history of psychology asking what makes people who they become and how they behave and develop the way they do. What makes the debate more interesting is that now scientists are asking if personality traits and even sexual orientation can be determined by what is in already there from conception. Bodies are built up of chromosomes which contain genetic information. Many of these are inherited from parents and relatives. The nature side of the debate states the way people are is predominantly from inherited genetics and other biological factors not so much the environmental factors. The genes humans have in their bodies play a huge role to many aspects of who they are and who they become. For example, hair colour, eye colour and height are all predetermined by genes. Unchangeable. This is natures way. The argument stands to decide whether most attributes do stem from nature, genes, or if they can be affected by the environment and the way people are nurtured as they have grown. The nurture side of the argument believes although humans do have the genes and traits with which they are born, most personality traits are being made up of environmental factors. For example, being loved and cared for as children, if parents or carers were positive role models and if those people were taught in ways which provided them with discipline and respect for others. Where nature