preview

Neo Behaviourism Vs Watson Neo Behaviorism

Better Essays

In the 1920’s, there were behaviorally inclined psychologists who did not agree with the radicalism of Watson's formulation. Many were willing to fully accept the methodology, but they did not agree to reduce the behavior to the strict formula of “Stimulus-Response.” A group of American psychologists made up of professionals such as Edward Tolman and Clark Leonard Hull developed the current of neo-behaviorism. This movement is based on the basic principles of behaviorism (environmentalism, mechanism, conditioning, non-introspective or mentalist approach) used intermediate variables such as purposes, cognitions, impulses and habits, to be able to analyze, predict and control behavior.

The neo-behaviorists expanded, modified and formalized Watson's behaviorism. In Watson, the rejection of the use of introspection appears very clearly, as something that is irrelevant in psychological research. Neobehaviorism uses protocols, the product of introspection, not to reach true internal processes, but as a verbal reaction that can be correlated with other externally measurable variables.

Neobehaviorism is more interested in deep research on the phenomenology of learning than in a study that demonstrates that one can easily discover the neurophysiological correlations of psychic processes. The experimental method uses animals to explain human behavior. They reject the expression of feelings.

There is a main divergence between the neobehaviorists and Watsonian behaviorism.

Get Access