Net Neutrality: Internet Service Providers

Net neutrality is an internet service provider (ISP) which requires treating all data equally. It is important to have net neutrality because rules and regulations have to be upheld. If there was no net neutrality, providers could do whatever they want because there would be no one consequences. Therefore, neutrality laws give businesses the chance to stand as equals. It affects companies and customers. In particular, when the customer pays for services such as T-Mobile, Bright House, and TECO they want fast and uninterrupted services as well as customer service ready to discuss concerns. Customers do not want to pay for services that do not deliver on its promise. Organizations have to make a profit to stay in business, and they need their

On December 14th, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will vote to replace current rules enforcing net neutrality. Nothing short of an extinction-level event will prevent it. But before we’re resigned to fate, know that while the battle for net neutrality at the FCC may have been lost, the war isn’t even close to being over which sounds kinda scary. Really, the net neutrality fight is simply migrating to a different theater, namely, The US Courts of Appeals. And excluding the possibility of a Supreme Court challenge, the outcome could very well drag on for another year and a half or more.

Before this assignment I had no idea what net neutrality was, I’m embarrassed to write that confession. “Net Neutrality is the assurance that access to the Web and its content will not be blocked, slowed down, or sped up depending on where that access is based or who owns the access point(s)” (Boswell). This to me means that the FCC (Federal Communications Commissions) want the internet to be open to all traffic, or online customers. They don’t want companies to be able to block or charge premium rates for the use of service. This allows all data to be equal and everyone is on the same “fast lane” of the road, sort of speck.

The concept of net neutrality is the fact that all internet service providers, or ISPs, have to treat all data on the internet the same, without regard to content, platform, etc(Wikipedia). The main purpose of this law is to prevent ISPs from executing abusive business practices that harm education and promote censorship. Without net neutrality ISPs would have control over the internet and what the consumers see. What this means is that companies can pay ISPs to be part of their service, and the companies that can’t pay will be slowed down. There are no downsides to net neutrality to the consumer, however from a business point of view ISPs won’t be making as much money(Debate.org). However that downside is easily outweighed by the several harms

Throughout the last decade, the idea of Net Neutrality has been the topic of many debates. Net Neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers should not be allowed to block their users from any content regardless of its source. The Debate is still continuing in 2017 with the F.C.C planning to repeal Net Neutrality and allow internet providers to completely regulate what their users can see and charge the users extra for “luxuries” such as social media, messaging, email, and music. There are two sides of this argument, one side believes that Net Neutrality should be taken away, while others believe that it is unfair for the Internet providers to have the right to take away the access to any content. Internet providers should not be allowed to control what content one can view when surfing the internet.

net neutrality rules restrict how companies may price and package computer network services. The rules prohibit bargains or bundles that are seen to discriminate among applications. Regulators see danger lurking in your broadband ISP, the cable TV system putting you online via a cable modem, or the telephone carrier connecting you via a digital subscriber line (DSL) or fiber to the home (FTTH) networks. The operator, left to its own devices, is feared to maximise its profits not just by taking your monthly subscription fee but by then skimming an unearned surcharge.

Net neutrality is defined as principle of treating all data on the internet equally by government and internet service providers and shouldn’t be charged differentially based on any term like user, content, site, platform application and modes of communication. Internet service providers shouldn’t rule us on what to do on the internet and should provide data content equally to all the users/corporations without any bias. This rule was implemented till now but recently Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reported to consider a new rule that Internet service providers (ISPs) to provide special treatment for the websites that pay an extra premium and slower for the one that don’t pay.

Without the net neutrality rules preventing data discrimination, for an ISP to be legally able block cut off a competitor’s direct access to their own customers is an ideal business move. Hurting a competitor’s sales while also restricting the customers access to only certain profitable services allows the ISP to once again benefit at the consumers expense. Consequently, the consumer is stuck in a monopolical situation, possessing no way to explore, much less purchase, better options for internet access because they can’t access any of their current ISPs’ competitors. In turn, the consumer is forced into steeper prices because they have no way of reaching better services (2). Ironically, situations where larger companies can weed out all of their competitors for complete control of their base has seen government intervention to restore the balance of the marketplace; however, the FCC is allowing ISPs to effectively create a monopoly over their customers. If nothing is done to combat grievous mistake of net neutrality, the ISPs will begin to make us, as the customer’s, suffer the repercussions as they have done in the

Net neutrality is the basis in which all internet providers must treat data on the Internet equally and not charge differently based on what device , website, application you use, or content you decide to view. The recent vote in the U.S. to repeal net neutrality’s guidelines is unjust because it violates 1st amendment guidelines, gives the people less freedom, and gives Internet service providers many ways to meddle with data speeds and how their users use the Internet.

Net Neutrality otherwise known as internet neutrality is the principle by which basic internet protocols should not be discriminatory and content providers should be equally treated by internet operators. It says your internet service providers should not be allowed to block or degrade access to certain websites or services, nor should it be allowed to set aside a “fast lane” that allows content favored by the internet service provider to load more quickly than the rest. Regardless of the amount of traffic transpiring, companies such as Verizon, AT&T and Comcast should treat all traffic in the same manner.

Net neutrality is the principle that supports free speech on the internet and allows us our right to freely communicate online (Singel, 2017). Net neutrality restricts major internet service providers, such as AT&T and CenturyLink, from discriminating upon certain online data because of content. Without net neutrality, these internet service providers would have the power to block or decrease the speed of specific internet content (Reardon, 2015). The providers would also be capable of charging money from internet users who want to access particular websites or data within websites. Websites that receive a large amount of users on a daily basis, such as Twitter and YouTube, would be given faster data speeds than less visited websites. This would lead to large companies monopolizing internet content, which would impact the way we browse online in a negative way. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) sets restrictions and regulations for broadcast, telephone and cable communications in the United States of America. The FCC is attempting to put an end to net neutrality. The vote to do so will take place on December 14, 2017. Ajit Pai, the current chairman of the FCC, is a former employee of Verizon Wireless. Verizon is one of the major internet service providers which would greatly benefit from net neutrality being abolished. Many questions have been raised concerning Pai’s past connections with Verizon, and a numerous amount of individuals believe that this is why Pai is pushing an end to net neutrality. Companies like eBay and Amazon will be required to pay more money to the major internet service providers in order to receive faster data speeds and better user efficiency. This would eventually lead to consumers having to pay more money for their performed endeavors online. The internet service providers would also have the potential to bundle websites into packages. Consumers would then have to purchase these packages in order to access specific websites. This is extremely similar to how DirecTV, Dish Network and other cable providers offer packages for television channels. Tom Wheeler is the former commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission. Wheeler expressed his thoughts on

The debate of Net Neutrality is much about keeping the Internet where it is now or how much to allow ISPs, specifically broadband providers, to manage their specific networks. However, this debate is more political than technical, therefore the issue is the Internet has grown so large and to the point that the government is now involved in setting regulations. ISPs, such as, Verizon, Comcast and others have very little interest in just installing the cable into homes, however, the interest is in what data you consume, and from whom and how much, merely there is a lot of money at stake.

When an ISP enables access to all content and applications regardless of what it is and where it’s coming from is called net neutrality. Net neutrality creates a balance and give equal chance to everyone whether big or small. It also lets you express your thoughts digitally through the means of internet. And it helps improve the internet everyday by letting everyone contributing to it. If net neutrality was to be removed then ISP’s would be able to control what the public can look at and watch.it will aslo snatch their digital freedom of expressing themselves freely. And it will also cause problems for small business who rely on internet to promote their businesses. But the good sight is their will be less discrimination about peoples, and

Net neutrality which is also known as net neautrality which ensure that no discrimination on the web services and network access by Internet Service Providers and some other government organisation. A uniformity and Neutrality is to be maintained.

Net neutrality is the principle that all internet traffic should be treated equally by the internet service providers. This policy is beneficial because all users of the internet will receive equal internet speeds and fair treatment. Taking away this equal treatment would defeat the purpose of an evolving system. This principle was created by Tim Wu in 2003 as an extension of of the common carrier concept which described the role of telephones in society. Net Neutrality towards applications and data has been one of the main reason for the Internet's success. It has granted the Internet's amazingly innovative and democratic nature. With net neutrality it is the internet's guiding principle, it is our safe guard and it preserves our right to communicate freely online. The internet without Net Neutrality changes the image of what the internet is today. Without net neutrality, phone and cable companies make the calls and decide which websites, content or applications succeed. Overall the government and all service providers should treat all data the same.