Net Neutrality : The Internet Should Have Unlimited Access To The Internet

If somehow we abolish net neutrality, we would come into a situation that so-called "law of the stronger" would be adopted. Large corporations will have primacy in the market, while smaller corporations will struggle to survive. And if we abolish net neutrality, I personally think that we will find the way to bypass the new rule. For example with illegal downloading, a lot of people have decided on this way, although they know it is a criminal act, because they are not in the financial situation to buy a service through the

First thing I want to point out what is net neutrality. Net neutrality is limiting internet service providers, such as AT&T, Verizon, Century Link, Comcast, MediaCom, etc., from charging their customers where they are using their internet. Right now internet service providers can slow access to certain cites and speed the internet upon other cites, they are basically controlling where people go and what they do on the web. They charge certain companies more for the customer’s use of that cite and then, in turn, those companies charge more to their customers. Basically net neutrality is making the internet a fair place that everyone can use without having to worry about if the internet site they use is going to be slow or if they will be going

But what exactly is Net neutrality? Net neutrality means cable companies such as Time Warner Cable and Verizon cannot charge more for faster internet speeds. Which means everybody who uses the internet will have the same speed. Hence the word neutrality. Verizon communication sued the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) saying that they do not have jurisdiction over that subject and limiting speeds is a violation of the First Amendment. "The FCC says Net neutrality rules are designed to preserve the internet as an open platform enabling consumer Choice, freedom of expression, and end-user control, competition, and the freedom to innovate without permission." This case went to the US court of appeals for the DC circuit. The courts ruled in favor of a Verizon. The reasoning for the decision is that “FCC has no authority to apply common-carrier obligation like non-discrimination and no-blocking rules to broadband providers.” I agree with this decision. The reason is that the internet should not be like electricity. If you plug your phone into the wall to charge. It's going to have the same amount of current as someone else charging their phone. But what happens if I want to charge my phone faster? I can’t because electricity is neutral. But when I go on the internet and I see it is slow. What happens if I want to make it faster? With Net neutrality I could not make it faster. I want the option to make my internet faster. And what happens to large corporations where internet speed is essential to stay in business? The fact of the matter is that the FCC does not have jurisdiction over this matter. Net neutrality should never be passed. It will only hurt the consumer. In addition, the FCC approved of a $9.25 monthly charge to help low-income families connect to the internet. Three out of the five Commissioners voted for the subsidy plan. This approval is one part of the reform of the fund

Without net neutrality, companies can charge the customer for how much data they use rather than a flat price. Most every other business practice is like this. If someone goes to get fast food and only wants a sandwich but has no other choice but to get the full meal, that is the same concept. This is very appealing to lots of people who may not use as much data as most internet users and feel that they are paying too much. Internet Service Providers are very against net neutrality because it costs them more money.

The concept of net neutrality is the fact that all internet service providers, or ISPs, have to treat all data on the internet the same, without regard to content, platform, etc(Wikipedia). The main purpose of this law is to prevent ISPs from executing abusive business practices that harm education and promote censorship. Without net neutrality ISPs would have control over the internet and what the consumers see. What this means is that companies can pay ISPs to be part of their service, and the companies that can’t pay will be slowed down. There are no downsides to net neutrality to the consumer, however from a business point of view ISPs won’t be making as much money(Debate.org). However that downside is easily outweighed by the several harms

But without Net Neutrality, big internet companies can come in and say, “Okay, so you’ve paid x amount of dollars for your internet. But, oh, if you want to get on Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter, or Facebook,

At the point where Net Neutrality is upheld, as it is at this moment, all network access suppliers must enable equal access to applications and content, paying little respect to the source. If it were not authorized, your internet service provider could make it harder for you to access parts of the internet at its own preference. Vast web organizations could support their own business advantages without the guarantee of net neutrality, but for the time being, eliminating Net Neutrality could influence everything from web speed to the general access to the internet.

Erasing net neutrality would stifle innovation, and allows large ISPs to piggyback off of the prosperity that a previously neutral Internet had. If these rules were in place before Alphabet or Facebook or Netflix or Amazon existed, it is hard to believe those companies would have been able to secure the funds to get through the paywall to consumers, which demonstrates that these attempts to destroy Net Neutrality are little more than an excuse to ask successful companies to pay more and disregard the ramifications to any possible future companies or the history that made certain companies

What is Net Neutrality? Well Net Neutrality is the set of rules that prevents internet companies from forcing people to pay extra fees to use websites they do not support; as well as preventing the internet companies from not allowing people to view said websites. Saving Net Neutrality is important to have an equal internet, the repeal of the rules can create an onset of problems, and the opposition falsely claims that the repeal has improved the broadband deployment. Therefore, Net Neutrality is important to have an equal internet so there is no prevention of access to the competitors’ of the internet companies that they own. According to Ryan Blethen, Net Neutrality rules help protect entrepreneurs, consumers, teachers, everyone, from monopolists

Net Neutrality is the principle of a free and open internet which is what we want. With it in place everything loads fast, if you have good internet, and you are able to access everything you want. So basically it protects you from your Internet Service Providers (ISP) from blocking anything they want. But the FCC is going to repeal it. This means that your ISP’s can and will create a slow and fast lane; where if you pay a certain amount of money you will be put in the fast lane. Also, your ISP’s will most definitely make a paywall for like an entertainment pack which would include Youtube, Netflix, HBO now and many more. I do recognize that the repeal of net neutrality will be tremendously beneficial for big businesses like AT&T so they can make money to create new technology, and for their own personal reasons. But people can already do that with an open internet, in fact a ton of people can do it because of the information they can obtain to learn things that they want to

Many Americans are hung up on fighting for Gay Rights or arguing about what side we should stand on the Israel conflict or even what they should watch on Netflix tonight. However, what they don’t realize they should be worrying about is Net Neutrality. Net Neutrality is, “the concept that broadband Internet service providers should provide nondiscriminatory access to internet content, platforms, etc., and should not manipulate the transfer of data regardless of its source or destination” (dictionary.com). Originally gaining a lot of attention back in 2004-2005 when Dialup internet was being replaced by broadband internet, most people have again recently heard about it, but never take the time to figure out

The internet has become the main source of information, communication, and entertainment for many people. Services like Netflix have replaced cable in many homes while Amazon now has the capability of same day shipping and even the shipping of food ingredients in some locations. We are becoming ever more reliant on the internet for our day to day lives. We expect to have the ability to do what we want on the internet. Watch whatever movie we like on Netflix, look up what your friend did on Instagram, or even find that cat video someone told you about at work. Net Neutrality is the concept that internet service providers allow you to use these services without interference. Websites, services and information cannot be blocked, slowed down or prioritized over others. Net neutrality means that all data should be treated equally (Kraemer). Net Neutrality is vital for our day to day lives and a lot more important than it may seem. In fact, without Net neutrality, the internet would change as we know it. The internet has always been an open platform for those who want their voices heard, their ideas shared, or their projects and businesses expanded. Removing it means that the internet would be a lot like paying for cable television. Internet service providers would be able prioritize websites and even block competitors or those who simply cannot afford to pay. Net neutrality is essential to allow users the free access of information he or she desires(Berkman). Ultimately, net

Net neutrality is simply a principle in which internet providers, corporations, and governments treat all internet data the same, meaning they do not restrict people’s internet use in any way. Professionally explained, “Strict net neutrality in our setting means that all incoming traffic is treated equally by the ISP and content providers are not charged for delivery of traffic” (Peitz and Schuett 17). Also, Steve Wozniak and Michael Copp’s short clip for USA Today shows that net neutrality even goes to the extent of preventing your broadband companies from slowing down or removing the ads

Net neutrality is the principle that all internet traffic should be treated equally by the internet service providers. This policy is beneficial because all users of the internet will receive equal internet speeds and fair treatment. Taking away this equal treatment would defeat the purpose of an evolving system. This principle was created by Tim Wu in 2003 as an extension of of the common carrier concept which described the role of telephones in society. Net Neutrality towards applications and data has been one of the main reason for the Internet's success. It has granted the Internet's amazingly innovative and democratic nature. With net neutrality it is the internet's guiding principle, it is our safe guard and it preserves our right to communicate freely online. The internet without Net Neutrality changes the image of what the internet is today. Without net neutrality, phone and cable companies make the calls and decide which websites, content or applications succeed. Overall the government and all service providers should treat all data the same.

Imagine waking up one day and realizing you can no longer access your favorite websites. Without net neutrality, this is exactly what will happen. Net neutrality is a government regulation; it ensures that companies do not get favored internet speeds for paying internet service providers (ISPs) a premium. The current net neutrality laws in the United States require our ISPs to give us equal speeds on any websites we may use regardless of creators or content. In the U.S net neutrality laws are strict, if Congress were to abolish these laws it would be disastrous; it would impinge upon our first amendment freedoms, internet service would cost more, small businesses would be negatively affected, and it would be the end of voice over internet protocol (VoIP).