preview

Netscape Case Study

Better Essays

Corporate Finance: Case Netscape 1. Why has Netscape been so successful to date? What is its strategy? How risky is its current competitive situation? Netscape follows a “give away today make money tomorrow”-strategy. Netscape currently has 75% of web browser market, making it by far the most popular browsing software. Netscape is making money by selling server software to companies that require marketing access to potential consumers, by selling its software packages and through providing services. Netscape gained its large market share by initially giving away its product for free, which turned out to be a very successful strategy. However Netscape finds itself in a risky competitive situation, as new competitors …show more content…

However, this is also one of the major disadvantages of an IPO. When investors diversify their holdings, the equity holders of the corporation become more widely dispersed. This undermines the investor’s ability to monitor the company’s management and thus represents a loss of control. Furthermore, once a company goes public, it must satisfy all of the requirements of public companies. Compliance with the new standards of tougher regulation, that were the result of several high-profile corporate scandals, is costly and time consuming for public companies (Berk and Demarzo, 2007). Other disadvantages of public ownership compared to the use of debt to satisfy capital needs is the loss of the tax shield, and the fact that IPOs as well as SEOs tend to be issued at a discount. Another advantage on the contrary is the fact that once an organization goes public, its structure makes it better suitable to remunerate management with stock and option plans. 6. Why are many IPO’s underpriced? It is in the interest of underwriters to underprice the IPO, to protect themselves against a loss, which might occur if the price is set too high and consequently the shares do not sell, while the underwriter has purchased the entire issue (in the case of a firm commitment IPO) (Berk and Demarzo, 2007). Rock (1986) mentions asymmetric information and rationing as the primary reasons for the underpricing of IPOs. When

Get Access