No Child Left Behind Act

Explanation of choosing the “No Child Left Behind” Act The “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB) Act is an important topic in education to me,

The education system is deeply flawed. It does not fight social injustice, but rather exacerbates the issue. The majority of people in the U.S are blind to the fact that there are still inequities within the education system, much less everyday life. A system based on standardized test scores inadvertently oppresses poor people. The Governments ' decision to judge a schools ' success by its test scores evidently created a faucet of running water for systematic oppression. The flowing water of oppression floods poor schools; drowning students with dreams, and giving no mercy. The only ones safe from the water are the privileged, who are oblivious to the fact that it exists.

When President George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) into law in 2002, the legislation had one goal-- to improve educational equity for all students in the United States by implementing standards for student achievement and school district and teacher performance. Before the No Child Left Behind Act, the program of study for most schools was developed and implemented by individual states and local communities’ school boards. Proponents of the NCLB believed that lax oversight and lack of measurable standards by state and local communities was leading to the failure of the education system and required federal government intervention to correct. At the time, the Act seemed to be what the American educational system

Good intentions are no excuse to continue a fail policy. Since the No Child left Behind Act (NCLB) became in effect, teachers have been restricted to teach in a certain way.

First, what is the achievement gap? According to the achievement gap in education refers to systematic variances in the ability to learn between students from majority populations and students from minority populations. The most significant effort made by the federal government to improve the nation 's schools and student learning is the 2002 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). The ESEA was largely designed to address the achievement gap in multicultural education. However, improvement in the academic performances of poor and minority students has been slow over the last forty years.

The purpose of this paper is to address the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) which was signed into law by President Barack Obama in December 10, 2015. The paper will also address the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) which was signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2002. The paper will talk about some of the key components of ESSA in comparison with NCLB and identify some possible strengths and weaknesses in ESSA’s new approach.

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) is a United States Act of Congress that is a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which included Title I, the government 's flagship aid program for disadvantaged students. No Child Left behind was enacted with the intent to become a government aid program for disadvantaged students, and eventually raise the general education standards for the United States. This act was created with the idea to “close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that no child is left behind” (ESEA) to put most simply. The act serves to only require certain basic skills, but does not have any national achievement standards, as it is decided on by each individual state. The bill was signed into effect by George W. Bush in January of 2002. Many people, opposers and supporters alike, argue that it is a "one-size-fits-all" approach to education and teaching that puts too much emphasis on testing and doesn 't fund schools properly, making it nearly impossible to achieve success. The law was initially designed to introduce national standards to a system in which students in some demographic groups were more likely to succeed and others likely to be left behind. But it allows states to determine how success is measured, which could be the source of its downfall.

This author discusses the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) and it mandates that every student in K-12 public schools will reach basic proficiency in math and reading by 2014. The goals of the accountability component of NCLB place emphasis on closing the achievement gap for all public school students, regardless of their socioeconomic status, ethnicity, or disabilities. The Federal Government mandates annual testing of all students in grades three through eight on challenging state standards for mathematics and reading (Beisser 2014). The author noted that the federal mandate didn’t intend on leaving any students behind, but after the law was passed it became evident that the United States has provided more, time, attention, resources and policies in the direction of students who scored below achievement level in reading and mathematics.

The possible risks of passing a child to the next grade level due to the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) could affect children from being the next leaders of America. So much that it has had a tremendous impact on their quality of education, testing skills, learning, and funding. The No Child Left Behind Act was passed in the year of 2002. It was established to require states and school districts to ensure that all of the students' are learning and are reaching their highest potential. It is true that every student can learn, however not on the same day or in the same way. Since the act was passed their policies has changed and so has many of the students situations have changed since then. In spite of the fact that, the polices has changed

Through the years there have been many pushes for better education and each time new laws are implemented. Many of the old laws have been updated with improvements. These new laws are given a new name. The “No Child Left Behind” Act has given everyone a new approach to education while implementing many new stipulations and regulations.

What is the No Child Left Behind Act? The article “Do states have the right to ignore federal laws that they do not want to follow,” have followers that disagree that states need more authority to avoid the federal government from commanding policies they go up against; the Tenth Amendment presents a constitutional foundation for affirming that power. Today, opponents dispute, that federal power has decreased to weak levels, threatening individual liberties and making state rights that much more vital as an necessary defense to federal misuse of power. Opponents, meanwhile, dispute that such an liberal understanding of states ' rights is not supported by a secure understanding of the Constitution, mainly, the supremacy clause of Article VI, which appoints the federal Constitution, laws, and treaties as the supreme law of the land, and the protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which prevents states from depriving any United States civilian of basic rights. A strong federal government is essential to make sure that all states follow the same federal laws. Without well-built federal power to join the country together, they will compete against each other, and each state could follow totally diverse sets of laws, causing confusion. Texas must discover other methods to assist and find solutions to No Child Left Behind. Texas does not have the right to overlook federal government commands related to No Child Left Behind. Every child in Texas must perform at his or her own

Education comes in many forms it is not about the policies. Education should be about the people who are willing to teach and change the future of tomorrow. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is to make sure that no kids are left behind in what they learn. Schools should be penalized for retaining the students; however they do not because the school just to pass the kids so they do not get in trouble. Education falls under three perspectives in the book; however having a student left behind can cause many conflicts. Also, there are many resources and strategies on how to avoid situations like retaining a student.

A well-meaning act often failed to translate into real benefits for citizens. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is an act of congress enforced by the United States government to improve primary and secondary education. NCLB required schools provides highly qualified teachers for students. NCLB also required the states administered set a proficiency standard, so-called Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), which gradually increase the percentage of student that must meet the proficiency standard. The stats administrator also setup a standardize test for all the public schools students. The standardize tests measure students’ proficiency in mathematics and English reading. The purpose of NCLB is to improve individual performance in education and to close the achievement gap between each student. With the requirement to meet AYP, educator are responsible to make more effective instruction. The principle of NCLB is to help all children reach proficiency. Ideally, all the public school will be able to reach 100% student proficiency on mathematics and English reading in 2014. NCLB is theoretically a wonderful act for student. However, it has an unrealistic goal. It has many negative side effects which merely fail to match its promise for all students.

No Child Left behind Act was the brainchild of President George W. Bush administration. The No Child Left behind legislation was signed into law on January 8, 2002. The act compels public schools receiving federal funding to carry out statewide standardized tests annually to all the students (Williams, McClellan, & Rivlin, 2010). Students have to take same test under same conditions. This essay seeks to enumerate ways in which the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 impact public schools.

The No Child Left Behind Act was passed by Congress in 2002. The law has a purpose to ensure that all children in the United States, receive a high quality education, so they can close the gap of achievement between the kids who do well in school, and the kids who do not. The people who support the NCLB, argues that this act will have a lot of positive effects. Some of the effects are the improvement of the student’s achievement; more time spent teaching the subject; better teachers and administrators; high expectations for the kids; the identification of poorly performing school and better confidence in school as the test score rise. Most of these are positive but the critics argued that there are some negative effects of the NCLB act. They say that this system is doing more harm than it is good. The fact that one test is the one indicator of weather students have learned what they needed to learn throughout school is crazy. There are psychologists that have said there should be more than one test done.