Of Mice And Men Movie And Book Comparison Essay

I believe that Crooks is most similar to Candy as in the social hierarchy of the ranch, both suffer from a disability that places them in the lowest rank. As mentioned, Crooks is lonely and isolated from the others due to the colour of his skin, yet Candy is lonely because he’s not as abled as the other workers. Because he is handicapped, he cannot do the work that the other men do, so when they go off to do work, Candy is left behind. The theme of loneliness is conveyed throughout the novel. Steinbeck also portrays loneliness through characterisation. He uses sexism, racism and ageism to get his message across. When George talks to Candy and his antiquated dog, Candy states to the inarticulate George:

One night when George goes out with the other men he leaves Lennie alone to play with his pup when he wanders into Crook’s room. Even though the majority of the time Crooks plays mind games with Lennie he ends up expressing his dream of equality. At this time period black people are still heavily discriminated against which effects how others treat him and how he accepts others. "'Cause I'm black. They play cards in there, but I can't play because I'm black. They say I stink. Well, I tell you, you all of you stink to me." (Steinbeck ___). Even though Crooks is just like all the other men on the farm he is still viewed in a negative way because of his skin colour. Afterwards, Crooks begins to describe his child hood discrimination does not exist and giving him a sense of

are only four different scenes in the entire novel. Chapter one is set at the

In the Of Mice and Men movie and novel the introduction moods and details have multiple similarities and differences. To start there are more details in the beginning of the movie. In the movie we start off seeing two men running away from a lady with a ripped dress and the men chasing them. Compared to the exposition of the novel where we start off with two men who “had walked single file down the path,” (page 2) a few miles south of Soledad. I feel that in the book you had to use your imagination to create more details due to the very discrete opening. Due to the details being very different in the movie compared to the novel, the moods were also much different. When we opened the movie we were greeted by a very ominous and energetic start

The character of Crooks is used to symbolize the social standing of the black community occurring during the time at which the novel is set. Crooks is a lonely African American on the farm that feels out of place. As George and Lennie explain their dream to Crooks he brushes them off and says that no one around here can implement their dreams. This realism gives the reader an impression that Crooks has absolutely no hope. However, Crooks may be pessimistic, but yet even he has a dream, which is the hope of one day experiencing the joys of his childhood again. Crooks' character is portrayed as very lonely in the novel, this is evident when Crooks explains, "A guy needs someone." (Mice 77). Crooks is telling the reader the need of human interaction. This realism that Steinbeck uses shows the reader the harsh realities of the black community during the time of the depression in the 1930's

The classic novel, Of Mice and Men, written by John Steinbeck was made into a Hollywood Blockbuster in 1992. Directed and acted by Gary Sinise and John Malkovich, Hollywood took a stab at trying to recreate this literary success. The novel, which takes place in the 1930’s, follows the lives of two men, George and Lennie, as they try to attain their dream of owning a farm. George is a smart man who always seems to have things figured out. Lennie is massive, but has the mind of a young child. George looks after him, but it is not easy since Lennie always seems to get himself in some kind of trouble. As they struggle towards their dreams, George and Lennie face obstacles that test

After that George and Lennie board a grey hound bus in a town, it is

In the movie, Of Mice and Men the scene in Weed was a lot different than the one explained in the book. First the girl is actually chasing them which didn't happen in the book. They also were chasing Lennie and George, not looking for them. I think the director chose to do it this way because it adds more to the story then seen in the movie ,and makes it more interesting. It’s also the beginning of the story so he probably wanted to draw you in. This changes the story. The director probably chose to start the story on a train for many reasons. First, it is pretty much a good way to start a movie. The director also might have done this because he wanted to show that they were leaving Weed. The director is telling us that George's life, has a lot of trains and transportation in it, because he moves around so much! This is also due to Lennie’s behavior, getting them kicked of town, after town, after town.

Stephen King once said, “Books and movies are like apples and oranges. They are both fruit, but taste completely different.” The superiority of a film adaptation compared to its original novel is a highly contested topic. Although it is stereotypical to say that a book is always better than its movie; that is not always the case. The 1992 MGM film adaptation directed by Gary Sinise of the 1937 novel Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, is among the few adaptations that can compete against the book.

The book Of Mice and Men was first written and published by John Steinbeck in 1937, and has captivated audiences since its inception. As such it has had several successful adaptations produced, most notably the movie produced by Gary Sinise. However, unlike many other movies Of Mice and Men has stayed relatively true to the book it derives its name from. Although it possesses these many similarities, the differences in the two texts are just as important. Unlike the book, the exposition of the movie takes place with George and Lennie riding on the back of a cargo train remembering their past experiences in Weed, which are revealed much later in the book. But the book also includes scenes the movie redacted. For instance, in the book after escaping

The fantastic book called “Of Mice and Men” was created/written by John Steinbeck. He was an American author who wrote 27 books, 16 novels, 6 non-fiction books, and 5 collections of short stories. But out of all his books and novels “Of Mice and Men” stood out from all of them. It’s probably one of his most popular books out of his entire collection. Then in 1992 “Of Mice and Men” an Indie film/Drama was created and directed by Gary Sinise.

Lennie is a very important character to the story. He is played by John Malkovich who is been in more than 70 motion pictures. He has received many Academy Award nominations and is also a director. In the movie he plays Lennie who is a very big man, but does not have a very big brain. In the movie the viewers can tell by how he speaks that he may have some sort of disability. Lennie is a great worker, but completely depends on George which affects him in the story. Curley is played by an actor named Casey Siemaszko. Casey does a very good job portraying the antagonist in the movie. Curley is the boss’s son. He acts very aggressive in the film and is rumored to be some sort of fighter. Curley picks fights with bigger men because of the fact that he is not that big himself. He has a wife who is a very influential character to the story. Curley’s wife is the only female in the story and her name is not referred to maybe because of the sexism occurring in that time period. She is played by Sherilyn Fenn who is a very good actress. In the film she is very flirtatious to the men and shows a sense of loneliness in

I am comparing the of mice and men book with the movie. I think that the book is better than the movie because the book has more details to it. The movie left out on some of the book. I didn’t like that the movie didn't show how George had a problem shooting Lennie. The book said that his hand was shaking and he dropped the gun. All George done in the movie was take a few minutes then he just got up and killed him. He didn’t even show any emotions on his face. I think it was bad acting, and they should have shown that more in the movie. The book also showed that he cared for and loved Lennie. I didn’t see that as much in the movie.

This is foreshadowed to an extent with Crooks knowing and study his civil rights in america. Candy has the situation where he is old and disabled, been on the ranch for years but has not gotten anywhere. Candy to dreams of having that reward but his life too is a struggle. He has ambition to be part of Lennie and George's American dream, "I could of hoed in the garden and washed dishes for them guys”. Even though this is the same as what he is doing now, he feels a sense of reward as he is doing it under his own will and he is free.

“We’ll live off the fatta the lan’” ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Of Mice and Men Movie Review Of Mice and Men captures the viewer’s attention with a girl in a red dress (Moira Harris) running through an open field, and our two main characters, George Milton (Gary Sinise) and Lennie Small (John Malkovich), running from men on foot and horseback with rifles and dogs. It gives us an insight on their personalities. It also shows us Lennie’s strength and “accidental violence” The cinematography is great, showing personal moments with close up shots, and less personal moments with far out shots. When Lennie and George are hiding in the ditch there is a close up shot, but when they are traveling to the ranch, there is a far away shot.