preview

Offensive Security: Capstone Analysis

Good Essays

Capstone Review This portion of the write-up is dedicated to evaluating and reviewing the class in an effort to provide instructors with information that can be used to improve MSIA 675 Offensive Security. As mentioned before, I took MSIA 676 previously so the intention here will be to provide extra feedback that compares the two classes. Nonetheless, the topics for review will include written versus lab-based assignments, evaluation of the topics covered, thoughts on the course textbook, lab content and difficulty, and additional FYI and resource information provided by the instructor. Thankfully, this incarnation of the class proved to be very different from the original. I took this class unaware that it was a reboot of MSIA 676 and …show more content…

When studying a tool or technique presented by a text, it is often difficult to comprehend its use fully because of their abstract nature. However, utilizing the hands-on component, which is fundamental in a lab environment, the student is placed in a more immersive circumstance, which forces them to apply critical-thinking to the task-at-hand. This allows them to not only see the tool or technique in use, but it also provides a more visuo-tactile learning environment that in turn, increases comprehension. For me personally, I feel that my lab write-ups were a hybrid between a written and a lab assignment. Weather it was correct, or not, I wanted to take the time to not only perform the lab tasks, but I felt the need to provide a comprehensive examination and explanation of the material. Although, I found it a little overwhelming at times, I feel that this provided me with a more comprehensive understanding of the course material.
This course also provided excellent topics to help the student understand the specific methods and tools used for hacking and system penetration efforts. In contrast, MSIA 676 often provide an abstracted examination of methods, a high-level introduction …show more content…

In MSIA 676 we used Patrick Engebretson’s “The Basics of Penetration Testing” (Engerbretson, 2013). Although, I found this to be more effortless to read, the information included in the text was very abstracted and high-level and did not delve into the specifics of hacking/penetration testing. It did however, prove to be more effective at describing the phases of penetration testing and incident handling, which gives the student an understanding of the organization aspects of system penetration. Conversely, the current textbook “Computer Security and Penetration Testing” (Basta, Basta, & Brown, 2014) and the related course topics provided a complete examination of penetration and forensic tools as well as interesting methods for exploiting systems and unique techniques used by attackers. In addition to this distinction, the current text’s chapter lengths made budgeting the course load more manageable while still providing a wide-range of concepts. The addition of the hands-on projects in the chapter review section, provided ample opportunity for the student to think critically about penetration techniques as well as how to use various tools in a way that promotes increased

Get Access