When it comes to organ donation it is a valuable and honorable service that a dying person or family of the recently deceased can contribute to society. Once an organ becomes available, it is very important to find the most suitable candidate quickly; which is why tissue samples are taken and tests are ran to find the most biologically-suitable match. However, there are sometimes cases in which there is more than one suitable person. When these situations arise, the decision process becomes more complicated. As the lead surgeon of the hospital, it is my job to decide which candidate is best suited to receive the organ donation. Currently, there is one heart ready for donation. However, there are three candidates that meet the need requirements. While each have their own personal need, unfortunately only one person will receive the heart. The decision is made based on the following situations: the patients current condition, their life expectancy after the procedure, and the patients’ health and complication with the new organ. Firstly, let’s start with patient number one, Jerry. When it comes to Jerry he is a middle age man (55) and nearing retirement. The reason Jerry has a bad heart is due to him using steroids in his early 20’s. He has a wife and three teenage children, in which he is the sole provider due to his wife having no career and no education, other than high school. His life expectancy after the procedure is expected to be 10-15 years, which is a high
With the evolution of time variety of advanced and useful medical procedures to save lives have been discovered, one of which being organ donations. Now days patients suffering from serious and life threatening conditions have the option of getting their organs replaced; a second chance at life. It should be mandatory that all people, once they have died be organ and tissue donors because after death they no longer need or use their organs. Secondly, by simply donating you could save numerous lives and lastly, there are critical organ shortages within Canada which could be resolved if there were more donors available
Organ transplantation is a term that most people are familiar with. When a person develops the need for a new organ either due to an accident or disease, they receive a transplant, right? No, that 's not always right. When a person needs a new organ, they usually face a long term struggle that they may never see the end of, at least while they are alive. The demand for transplant organs is a challenging problem that many people are working to solve. Countries all over the world face the organ shortage epidemic, and they all have different laws regarding what can be done to solve it. However, no country has been able to create a successful plan without causing moral and ethical dilemmas.
Great advances in the science of organ transplantation have made it possible for many lives to be saved from conditions that would have otherwise been considered fatal. Anyone between the ages of 18 and 60 and in good general health can be organ donors. Thanks to these scientific advances, living donors are now able to donate entire kidneys and portions of other regenerative organs such as the intestine, liver, lung, and pancreas. Full portions of these organs as well as others, such as bones, corneas, hearts, and tendons can be harvested from donors shortly after the declaration of death. Unfortunately, too few donors exist to meet the demand for these
The first couple things that are discussed in this article are the current shortage of organs being received or donated and the excess demand and how it relates to our current altruistic system. They give three logical reasons as of why there is an increasing number and that is due to our advanced technology which makes the procedure go smoothly, insurances allow to cover some
The above scenario is just one of many that occurs every single day in this world, in all walks of life. Whether one has already chosen to become an organ donor or has reservations about donating tissues and organs, it can be a sensitive subject to many. There are many legitimate fears and myths behind organ donation and the recovery of organs – anywhere from those that believe it is against their religion to the actual process itself, discussed as follows.
However, the number of people who have received one of these lifesaving organs represents only a minor percentage compared to the amount of patients who are still waiting. As the successes of organ transplants have brought relief to some people, it has also brought up some new issues. Considering that the process of organ transplantation had become perhaps the most successful treatment for a significant range of illnesses, more patients are in need of this procedure. The issue reaches beyond the surgery room and the doctor’s capability of achieving a successful and effective surgery. The problem, however, grounds on the critical shortage of donor organs. The escalation of the mortality rate among the patients in hope of an organ donation is due to the scarcity of organs. Since there are not enough donor organs to match the demand, patients often have to wait, in many cases, a deadly period of time. The increasing difficulty of meeting the supply and demand of donor organs had led to create an organ allocation system with questionable
For this reason, according to Pete Du Pont, “instead of looking for new ways to ration organs or take them prematurely, we should ask how we can increase the supply of organs so that doctors are not forced to decide who lives and who dies” (483). There is a misconception that doctors determine which of the organ donors die and which of the recipients live. Conversely, the reality is that the United Network for Organ Sharing has set up a complex system which only determines a person’s place on the list of recipients based on medical evaluation, not who loses his or her life donating their
Organ Transplants are done everyday, hearts, lungs, kidneys and so many more. The strange thing is people and scientist are beginning to think that possible memories are stored in these organs. People have began to show different characteristics after they have had an organ transplant surgery. Most scientist have had actual meetings with recipients and the donors to actually try and figure out why our organs are able to do this. Even though the research scientist have done does not fully say for sure whether or not this is actually a proven fact they are almost positive this could be the reasoning behind the recipients starting to have different characteristics in the way they live.
Recent reports of public figures receiving life-saving transplants have brought renewed attention to the scarcity of organs and the importance of organ transplants. Although more transplants are being performed in the United States each year the transplant waiting list continues to grow. It has been considered that the decrease in organ donors is due to the unsuccessful measures taken by health care professionals. This is a limited view of the matter because health care professionals are not directly responsible for the policies and other guidelines for procuring organs. The general population does not have the interest of suffering individuals at heart when it comes to donation.
In 1984, Leonard Bailey transplanted a baboon heart into an infant baby. The heart failed after 20 days, but lead to the first pediatric human to human heart transplant a year later. In my opinion, the medical world can only go so far to save or extend life. I am sure that the mother of this child was very glad that her child was given the chance. I am concerned on how far the medical profession would be willing to go to preserve or extend life. The subject of these types of procedures can mean more to someone who thinks that it will save their life, but in the end, we all will pass on.
Specific Purpose: By the end of my presentation, the audience will donate their organs and tissues when they die and act upon their decision to donate.
Donor organs fall into two categories: those from living and those from deceased (where most come from). Deceased donors can donate: two kidneys, two lungs, a liver, heart, pancreas, intestines, as well as hands and faces. Living donors can donate: one kidney, one lung, portions of the intestine, liver, or pancreas (“What Can Be Donated,” n.d.). The problem with using deceased donor’s organs is that there are only about 10,000 to 12,000 deaths annually that occur in such a way for the organs to be viable for transplant, meaning a small chance of finding a match (Espejo, 2003). The ideal organ comes from a donor with the same blood
Organ and tissue donation can be defined as the removal of organs and tissues from either a living donor 's body or body of a patient who has recently died and transplanting the anatomical gifts into the body of the recipient (Frey and Waun n.p.). Donation has continuously verified itself in the science world as an exemplary form of medical treatment. Based on the advancements in donation over the years, one can expect further amendments to be made to the life-saving treatment in such high demand today. Various circumstances, such as an increase in obesity and life expectancy, have become primitive factors in determining the demand for organs. The ever-growing need for transplantable organs increases daily, which in turn is accountable for
If you could save a life after losing yours, would you? It is as easy as checking yes or no at the Department of Motor Vehicles or going online to donatelife.com, whether you would help someone after you have passed on. Organ and tissue donation is a topic that does not get enough attention. "Ninety-five percent of Americans say that they support donation yet the number of registered donors is much smaller (www.organdonor.gov). " Anyone can sign up to be a donor. After death you can donate your organs. Each day 18 people will die waiting on organs. Tissues are also able to be donated.
Utilitarianism was establish by John Stuart Mill, and it is based on the principle of what is the greatest good for the greatest amount of people (Robinson, 2015). It is concern with the impact on individuals as a whole in society. If the act is right or wrong it is only determined by its consequences. The common phrase used in this theory is that the “consequences justify the means”. Utilitarianism applies to this situation because patients with the most immediate need and those who benefit the most should receive the donor organ (Fremgen,