Schein (as cited in Baumgartner, 2009) describes artifacts as follows: ‘At the surface we have the level of artifacts, which include all the phenomena that one sees, hears, and feels when one encounters a new group with an unfamiliar culture. Artifacts would include the visible products of the group such as the architecture of its physical environment, its language, its technology and products, its artistic creations, and its style as embodied in clothing, manners of address, emotional displays, myths and stories told about the organization, published lists of values, observable rituals and ceremonies, and so on’. Each PTO meeting that was attended took place inside of the school gymnasium. Initially, to get to the gymnasium, you must walk
Historic treasures and artifacts are often donated to or purchased by other nations to place in their museums. Often museums are given the objects with full cooperation from the originating country, but sometimes they are stolen or given for protection such as in a time of war. When nations want the artifacts returned it can cause a disagreement with the other nations of who the rightful owner is.
Artifacts can be identified in several ways throughout an organization. These artifacts are evidence of the history great leaders that can be seen around team settings, that are celebrated as a part of the organization telling a compelling story illuminating important and desirable values (Macintosh 6). The most easily identifiable aspects of organizational culture are the artifacts that are tangible and observable. For example, in regards to Cal Rugby, they have a rich tradition of winning. With winning come the accolades such as, plaques, trophies, etc. The history of Cal Rugby cannot be
Many people visit museums to view antiquities. They enjoy seeing these relics of the ancient world as a way of understanding past cultures and sometimes connecting with their own heritage. This evidence was found in the passage, “Returning Antiquities to Their Countries of Origin” by Joyce Mortimer paragraph 1. Cultural artifacts should not be returned to their region of origin because some people don’t have enough money to travel to China or Brazil to go look at ancient artifacts from the past. So they should bring these ancient trinkets to places like America and Canada so people around the world can study different cultures to learn more about the life around use.
The artifact represents personal objects and meaningful moments, person influence on our own life. This is one of the assignment in our program to share our artifacts toward our colleagues and professors. This will take in more about different culture, uniqueness, identity and values of our schoolmates and how they reflected in their life.
These issues with museums and other institutions has led many tribes to not only protest these collections and demand the most sacred items back, but to also develop their own institution that not only tell the real story of their people from a non scientific point of view, but also show the proper resect for the sacred and religious artifacts. Religious sights and objects are a piece of many different groups culture, many of which require a certain level of respect. Within the United States Native American groups are reclaiming these objects for their own
The issue of artifacts that have been taken from their original homes has started some global debate. Some may say that the artifacts need to be returned to their place of origin or who found them. They may also say that there are laws saying that the artifacts should be returned. Others may say that no matter who the objects belong to the artifacts should remain in museums around the world. Artifacts should not be returned to their nations of origins.
Politics within nations and communities influences the finding of art artifacts and the eventual explanation of the art artifacts because they decide who has the right to claim it. If an archeologist finds an artifact that belongs to a nation or community and has significance, then the archaeologist can’t claim it. This can cause archaeologists and art historians to feel a certain pressure within their research projects because they can’t retaliate if a community claims the artifact they’ve been researching and studying. However, when the rightful community claims the artifact, they may be able to add insight into the meaning of the artifact because it belongs to them so they may know more about
The first artifact I am using is the zoo animals. Antonina the zookeeper’s wife, nurses all of the baby animals she also takes care of the animals that are hurt or sick. Before the war had started the animals were Antonina’s life she guarded them with all her heart. When the war began lots of the animals were killed by bombs that were shot off by Nazi Germany. Other animals were killed by Nazi soldiers because the soldiers thought that the animals
Nonverbal communication plays an important part in any interpersonal transaction. Artifacts are ornaments or adornments that communicate messages about us. We choose artifacts for both function and for the message that they say about us. When people enter your space and see an artifact they may interpret it in different ways.
Artifacts explain a lot about a civilization. It gives information about when a civilization exist. The Lapita culture is seen to have developed in various islands as seen through the goods of pottery. Criticism of the Lapita culture is that their change in settlements throughout the time periods was not as striking as it appeared.
An observable artifact is defined as the physical manifestations of an organization. These artifacts can include a company’s dress code, stories about the company and rituals within the company. The main observable artifact that Chrysler had and the reason Mr. Marchionne was upset about was the way manager Fong doubled rebates in order to make sales. This tactic was part of the culture that led to the company not being profitable. Another observable artifact came with the changes Mr. Marchionne implemented such as his weekly meetings with his staff. Espoused values can defined as the normal standards
My experience with the PLC meetings have been good. I don't think they've been great because most of the time I don't get anything out of it. I still have no idea what the PLC meetings are supposed to help with. I think if we had more things to talk about it would be helpful, we should come to the meetings knowing what is going to be talked about so we can brainstorm ideas before coming to the meeting. We just need more topics to talk about so it can be easier to interact. One thing that might be fun to do in the PLC meetings is to do different activities, more like hands on things so we aren't sitting at the table the whole time. It’s obvious that the best part of the meetings is the food. Another thing I enjoyed from the meetings was when
I was just looking at my PTO and I am coming up with different numbers on what was carried over from the black out period back in May. I was very careful to review my available PTO when I was finally able to request it back in May to make sure my time carried over was accounted for. I requested a total of 96 hours and allowed for 16 hours to carry over to the next year as that was the time allowed at the time. When I check the PTO summary today it shows I only carried over 65.52 due to the blackout. That is roughly 46 hours short of the 112 hrs that I thought would carry over, a drastic difference and I was wondering if there was any way you could double check the amount that I
Beside the invasion, cultural artifacts is also an aspect that is misjudged towards people’s genesis. Firstly, cultural artifacts are merely shown the adaptation to what is better, rather than expressions of one’s origin. For example, Pryor has a conversation with Sam Lucy, an archaeologist, about the change in burial rights in Britain during the end of The Roman period; Lucy mentions how people were buried with different objects: “a cross shaped branch, and this approach isn’t a continental import. It’s idea came ultimately from the continent, but it is a British product” (Sam Lucy). This reveals that the idea of the object comes from outside of Britain, but British people are the one who modify and execute that idea. The fact that British takes the ideas from continent to differ their style proves that artifacts are found to belong to Anglo-Saxon people could actually be made similarly by the British to improve their daily life. So this idea indicates that culture artifacts do not tell where people come from. Moreoever, cultural artifacts are found around the world might have been traded and transported there, and did not belong to local inhabitants. Particularly, Mark Cartwright, who has a Master of Arts in Greek philosophy, talks about trading goods in ancient times: “goods were not only exchanged across the Roman world, however, as bustling ports such as Gades, Ostia, Puteoli, Alexandria, and Antioch also imported goods from such far-flung places as Arabia,
Culture is manifested at different layers as artifacts, values and beliefs and basic underlying assumptions, artifacts are the outer layer of the culture. Artifacts include logo, uniform, architecture of its physical environment, language, artistic creations and technology, which are visible structures and processes. In Young Zoologists’ Association there are artifacts, which are visible to the members of the association as well as external parties.